Moreover, he argues that both texts were written after the death of their subject, and by their close devotees, in a dialogue style. However, the geographical barriers made it difficult for Greeks and Indians to have a true "exchange of ideas" for decades later. As a result, Dillon argues that their influence on each other was rather tortuous (526). Although at first sight Socrates, who claimed not knowing anything in the end, and Buddha, who believed he was the enlightened one, do have a fundamental discrepancy in their view point, both teachers shared alike nature which Dillon calls "extreme openness" (527-528). According to Dillon, this openness is observable in their philosophy, their social manners, and finally, their approach to death (528). For instance, Socrates, being a teacher, tries to open the doors for discussion and not dictating his personal views on others. His kindness and empathy accordingly encouraged his followers
Moreover, he argues that both texts were written after the death of their subject, and by their close devotees, in a dialogue style. However, the geographical barriers made it difficult for Greeks and Indians to have a true "exchange of ideas" for decades later. As a result, Dillon argues that their influence on each other was rather tortuous (526). Although at first sight Socrates, who claimed not knowing anything in the end, and Buddha, who believed he was the enlightened one, do have a fundamental discrepancy in their view point, both teachers shared alike nature which Dillon calls "extreme openness" (527-528). According to Dillon, this openness is observable in their philosophy, their social manners, and finally, their approach to death (528). For instance, Socrates, being a teacher, tries to open the doors for discussion and not dictating his personal views on others. His kindness and empathy accordingly encouraged his followers