Comparing Marx And Hobbes

Improved Essays
Marx also believed that labor is what leads to our self- realization. It is through labor in which humans are able to know themselves because they are able to understand their own self-conscious. When participating in Labor, Marx argued that people’s consciousness are engaged in their own labor as well as the products they produce. In other words, their minds are fixated on things other than themselves. However, while they are in the process of doing so, their consciousness is engaging in feedback that helps them know themselves better. They are fixated on what they are working on, but at the same time, they are fixated on themselves. As a result, Marx believed that labor was something that should be encouraged because it helps humans …show more content…
Both of them also had certain viewpoints about man that are similar to each other. Both Marx and Hobbes believed that humans are higher creatures that are separate from nature. Humans are no longer part of the natural condition and as a result, they do not have the same needs and desires that animals have. Humans additionally have complex needs that are contingent on society. For Hobbes, people are separated from the natural world by signing on to contracts. They sign on to these societal contracts because they desire well-being for themselves. For Marx, people are largely contingent on the socio-economic state in which they live. Humans have desires that are unchanging and also have desires that are artificially created In addition, humans are capable of doing things that animals cannot do. They have specific goals that are not contingent on survival, as humans spending their whole lives trying to accomplish those goals. For Marx, in a capitalistic society, it is the engagement of hobbies after the participation in labor in which humans strive. When humans go beyond capitalism, humans would be trying to accomplish the goal of making the world a better place by serving humanity. Hobbes, it is power that people strive to gain. People want to gain power in the form of wealth or institutional power. In a broader sense, people want to move away from death and towards life, and their end goal is to live a life that is both prosperous and

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Thomas Hobbes established his own ideas about people and politics. For example, Hobbes believed that humans were selfish and did anything to better their position. Also, he believed that nations were selfishly motivated and only battled for power and wealth…

    • 178 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes states that “in order to live a more contented life… men must give up their freedom to the State” (Document 2). He believed that people were naturally cruel and needed protection from themselves. Hobbes wanted rule by absolute monarchs. He thought it was the only way to keep people in check. His beliefs closely supported how many people thought back then.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Man is meant to work to satisfy his own needs, however now this work has been distorted and used for external gains outside the worker. This taints the process of labor which is a part of man’s nature, therefore estranging man from nature. In addition, Marx argues that man’s physical and spiritual life is intrinsically linked to nature, as man is a part of nature. Therefore, the estrangement of the worker to nature is in essence the estrangement of man to himself. This is because the worker is estranged from the functions that make him man, as they are distorted for capitalist gains.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Human nature is defined as the general psychological characteristics, feelings, and behavioral traits of humankind, regarded as shared by all humans. Both philosophers, Jean Rousseau and Thomas Hobbes discuss about human nature in their writing although they both have different perspectives. Rousseau claims that humans weren’t originally evil, no unequal wealth or inequality, people went through many phases before reaching that stage in their development. However, Hobbes thinks otherwise, he argues that our human nature is being evil or being in a constant war with each other meaning we need a common power to control us. Hobbes has the correct view on human nature because people are fighting each other constantly and afraid of…

    • 115 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Starting off, they each had a distinctive understanding of human nature from one another. To Rousseau, humans in primitive times were "noble savages" and it is "civilization" that turned man into a "beast". Conversely, Hobbes believed that being "civilized" is a positive trait and being uncivilized or a "savage" is bad. Concerning human nature, Rousseau theorized that humans were innately good and generous, before being corrupted by the vices of civilization. Human life was most likely peaceful and compassionate as described in his opening line, “Man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains.”…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In addition, the worker becomes a slave of his object. He first receives an object of labour, he receives work, and then a means for survival so that he can continue being a worker. (Marx, 1992, p.325). Through externalization of the worker, his labour becomes an object, it exists outside of him and confronts him. Considering that the labour of the worker is only a means of survival; it is alternatively work forced to perform for someone else (Marx, 1992, p.326).…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are numerous parallels between the theories of Hobbes and Machiavelli. These provide strength to both of their arguments but their similar outlook on the relationship between human nature and political structure also provides space for similar questioning. Through the comparison of Machiavelli and Hobbes, the question of the worth of liberty arises. Liberty and security go hand in hand in that security of the populace is necessary before any individual can truly be free. But in order to attain security, individuals must give up countless political rights.…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes Vs Rousseau

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778), generally accepted as the father of Romanticism, believed that humans are born basically good and that original sin does not exist in the human heart (Hergenhahn & Henley, 2014, p. 198). This is Rousseau’s basic point behind the statement “Man is born free yet we see him everywhere in chains” (Rousseau, as cited in Hergenhahn & Henley, 2014, p. 198). People, as inherently good, do not require governing, whether by the state, the Church, or any other social institution. It is society and its attempts to control individuals that lead to harmful behavior. In this sense, Rousseau disagreed with Hobbes who also believed that in order to understand humans, one needs to recognize natural impulses.…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes Vs Rousseau

    • 846 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How is man described by Hobbes and Rousseau different in the State of Nature and how does it determine the nature of contract that the two write about? The debate regarding man’s natural state has been at the forefront of political philosophy for hundreds of years now. This is because a lot of philosophers have used their understanding of the natural state of man as a foundation to build their arguments on. Furthermore the understanding of man’s natural state has directly led to the formation of political ideologies in the form of contracts in both Hobbes’s and Rousseau’s political philosophies.…

    • 846 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Hobbes, John Locke and Karl Marx were three opposing philosophers during the Enlightenment with their own interpretations on government and people. Hobbes believed society needed an absolute monarchy, “to confer all their power and strength upon one man.” Locke said that human nature had natural rights, and were therefore “not to be under the will or legislative authority of man.” Finally, Marx believed in communism, in which belongings are public. All of the philosophies had their own relation to the social contract, which was introduced by Jean Jacques Rousseau.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes and Locke are both social contract theorists who have influenced many citizens of this country. To begin, they both start out talking about human nature. Locke and Hobbes had very different views regarding human nature. Locke claimed human nature as reason and Hobbes claimed it as power and appetite. Locke believes that reason is the primary attribute of human nature.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes Vs. Rousseau

    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Hobbes argues that men are innately selfish, while Rousseau believes that humans are naturally good beings. Rousseau argues that the “nature” presented by Hobbes is in fact “unnatural.” Hobbes argues that man is evil, that government is needed in order to protect the public, that the government should be all-powerful, and that power should not be shared. In contrast, Rousseau argues that man is good and that society is the reason that man has been misbehaving, that the government’s purpose is to protect the social contract, that the government should be able to be overthrown, and that power should be shared and direct. The main divergence in these two educated philosophers theories is the fact that Hobbes believes that society is needed in order to prevent mankind from a “human nature” that is beastly and savage, while Rousseau argues that human nature is inherently good, however when man come together in society, they corrupt…

    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes Views On Rebellion

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Extremely unlike Hobbes’s view, Locke had a more positive view of human nature and believed in their views and opinions. Locke believed humans could improve themselves and even a government if they were willing to do, so while Hobbes on the other hand believed that humans were narcissistic and only thought about themselves and strived for their own benefit. It is in Locke’s book “The Second Treatise on Government” that the most precise examinations into the right of revolution can be found. Its clear from his book that the right of rebellion and revolution ties hand in hand with Locke’s political theory. this book was used almost to justify the revolution in the late seventeenth century (O’Tool,2011).…

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Several positions exist in philosophy regarding human nature. Karl Marx and Charles Darwin give two of these positions. Karl Marx’s philosophical position on human nature was that economic substructure and society determines human nature (Wall 279). He felt that humans are social animals that are driven to produce in a way that benefited society, and that human nature is “expressed in a drive to spontaneously and creatively produce products in a manner that is conducive to social and individual satisfaction” (Byron). Marx’s view is that human nature is driven by social and economic forces that serve to better society as a whole and push humans to make this happen.…

    • 1510 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx criticizes capitalism in a multitude of his essays, including the Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844. His critique of capitalism varies from the exploitation of workers to the instability of the capitalist system, but fundamentally his issue with capitalism is the dehumanization of laborers. Marx argues that under capitalism, laborers are dehumanized because they are alienated, or disconnected from fundamental human properties, in four aspects – products of labor, labor, species-being, and human-human relations. The basis of Marx’s theory of alienation is the laborer’s estrangement from his labor, which arises from alienation from the laborer’s object of production. According to Marx in the Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844, “the object which labour produces – labour’s product – confronts it as something alien, as a power independent of the producer” (71).…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays