Comparing Machiavelli´s The Prince And Thomas More's Utopia

Great Essays
Niccolo Machiavelli’s The Prince and Thomas More’s Utopia were written during a relatively similar time period in the early 1500s. Therefore, both Machiavelli and More’s main character, Raphael Hythloday, both have a lot of the same perspectives on human nature. They discuss the behavioral nature of kings as well as everyday people and outline the ways they conduct themselves. Essentially, both Machiavelli and Hythloday share the same views on human nature, mainly focusing on the fact that humans are naturally selfish people whose behavior is almost always driven by self-interest.
Raphael Hythloday starts off by generalizing the human nature of all kings as selfish individuals who strictly behave according to their own personal desires. He
…show more content…
He advises his audience, kings/princes, to appear as if they are the guardian angel for their people but they, “must be a great liar and hypocrite” (Machiavelli, The Prince 48). Therefore, Machiavelli isn’t necessarily asking kings to change their natural behavior, but rather make their selfish behavior seem noble. It is always in people’s best interest to help themselves first, but if one can achieve that without other people noticing it, they are golden. Thus, everyone is naturally selfish, it is just a matter of some people being better at masking it than others. Therefore, Machiavelli knows that we always prefer to do what is better for ourselves. He says, “hatred may be earned by doing good just as much as by doing evil… a prince who wants to keep his state, often bound to do what is not good” (Machiavelli, The Prince 53). Here, Machiavelli recognizes the fact that sometimes our decisions won’t always please everyone, and that’s okay. He advises us to not always behave the way people want you to because sometimes the right thing to do is also the harder thing to do. This is similar to Hythloday’s point of view when it comes to thieves. He knows if they escape their punishment it is against the rules, but we cannot blame people for trying to survive, “They think that a crime clearly and deliberately attempted is as bad as one committed, and that failure should not confer advantages on a criminal who did all he could to succeed” (More, Utopia 74). He is trying to get people to understand that not all bad human behavior necessarily has bad intentions. Another point that Hythloday makes that Machiavelli also agrees on is that, “Fortune governs half of our actions” (Machiavelli, The Prince 67). Not to mention, Machiavelli capitalized the word “Fortune” even though it isn’t even the start of the sentence. This reveals his intention to emphasize the

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    If you do this, I shall have justice at your hands – I and my children,” (Apology, 41e). On the other hand, Machiavelli would not want to live an examined life because his stealthy ways could be exposed and cause uproar from constituents. Additionally, Machiavelli would have thought the rulers during Socrates’ time were just in sentencing Socrates to death because killing exhibits the power of a state. Machiavelli believes that politicians must get their hands dirty and that doing good is not necessarily being good. For example, a political leader can be doing something good by feeding the poor, but if that does not benefit that state, then he is not being a good political leader.…

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He raises the question of whether it is better for a leader to be loved or feared by the public. He answers with the statement, “The reply is, that one ought to be both feared and loved, but as it is difficult for the two to go together, it is much safer to be feared than loved, if one of the two has to be wanting” (69). Machiavelli backs up this statement by saying that a leader who is feared can make decisions and execute orders much more effectively. He thinks a prince should be trusting to a certain degree, but should always be prepared for disaster, saying, “And the prince who has relied solely on their words, without making other preparations, is ruined…” (69). Machiavelli’s thought initially seems negative, as he lacks faith in the public to remain loyal to their prince.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To defend his opinion, the author explained that as a result of the wicked nature of men, the prince will be guarded from their corruption. Machiavelli considers men as “ungrateful, fickle, liars and deceivers, fearful of danger and greedy for gain.” Furthermore, the following quotes “While you serve their welfare, they are all yours,...” and “But when the danger is close at hand, they turn against you.” support his statement towards the qualities of men. Humans are corrupted beings, therefore causing them to be fearful will suppress their power.…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niccolò Machiavelli and Alvar Núñez Cabeza de Vaca went through different experiences that led them to have their own perspectives in human nature and create their ideals for good governance. The simple fact that Cabeza de Vaca was unfortunate enough to have a hard time throughout the expedition made him more open minded about human nature, while Machiavelli had a set idea of what human nature was and how it ties to good governance. Machiavelli's view on human nature is the same as what is a good governance a good leader and a good human being is someone who knows how to be respected and feared without being hated and how that leads to have the people the Prince governs happy and on his side. Cabeza de Vaca has a more down to earth view on human nature but that differs…

    • 2016 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although, society would say to “walk away,” not every problem you meet in life are you capable of simply walking away. Machiavelli emphasizes the fact that any one individual cannot always be righteous, such that, certain situations requires you to be a little bit more evil. Instead of Machiavelli stating what everybody would like to live, he tells us the truth in…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He is writing this text in order to counsel and influence the minds of rulers or as he calls them, “Princes”. Machiavelli calls for the separation of politics and ethics. Machiavelli does not like Christianity and despises the Holy Roman Empire, as he does not believe Princes should submit to a set of grandiose ideals. Rather a prince should take whatever action is necessary to prolong his rule and protect the state, regardless of religious or ethical considerations. Machiavelli provides a harsh, sometimes callous version of complete and outright…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The significance of temporality is explained in two very different ways by Niccolo Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes. The limitations of states and the fundamental driver of what is essentially the human decay that amounts to the dissolution of the state. Both are aware that political systems decay over time. They attempt to dissolve the problem of preserving the political system over time. Their views on history shape their solutions, however both think very differently.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Machiavelli's Summary

    • 2626 Words
    • 11 Pages

    This quote is taken out of the part of text when the topic of what princes are blamed or praised for is discussed. It states that a man who solely looks at what should be done, most often in an ethical mindset, without the context of what the state of situation is, would not prosper as a leader and the respect the people have for him would diminish, leading to his ultimate demise. He is stating that one cannot act morally at all times if that is not what’s best at the time because those people who are not moral would act up and possibly overthrow the leadership. Machiavelli believes that leaders, in order to be strong and maintain power must serve themselves and not the people, and therefore uses this statement to illustrate that those in power must primarily accomplish what is best for themselves, and not the people in order to be “virtuous” leaders and have the respect of subjects and ultimately,…

    • 2626 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The paper would give a small biographical section on Machiavelli describing his life, but more importantly how he arrived at his state of mind concerning religion. He needs placement within the context of his society and peers as well. His internal fight with humanism largely played a role in shaping his worldview. However, the paper focus’s mainly on The Prince and the Discourses of Livy in an effort to note the way in which Machiavelli portrays religion. From there the project would look at the influence of the ancient writings and religion on Machiavelli.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Machiavelli’s Prince is a more morally ambiguous ruler; though he does not look down upon the just, and in fact praises and strives towards it whenever possible, the Prince does not fear committing harsh deeds and ordering unjust acts if he determines that doing so will further the interests and prosperity of his state and his people. He is trained primarily in the art of war, and places the…

    • 1713 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Machiavelli dives into politics with a very aggressive and pure mindset suggesting kings and princes to only worry about the end result without caring for the means of achieving it. Informing the readers that they should do anything it takes to get into and stay in power, the ends justify the means ideal. Machiavelli states that “Every one sees what you appear to be, few really know what you are, and those few dare not oppose themselves to the opinion of the many, who have the majesty of the state to defend them; and in the actions of all men, and especially of princes, which it is not prudent to challenge, one judges by the result.” essentially saying even if the means are unjust the people only see and judge you by the results. However, the “few” mentioned by him will eventually lead to a breach in society.…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The way in which Machiavelli and More treat each individual society is shaped by their view of human nature. More is concerned about the flaws and failings he sees in man but tries to mould them into his view of perfection in Utopia. He has a more positive view of view of man, and strives to shape their environment. He believes the key to improve mans environment, meaning socially, economically and politically (Mukhopadhyay, 2012), than so will man and it will ultimately bring out the best in human nature.…

    • 1954 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli theory argues that a ruler must do whatever it takes to gain and hold political power, but in the eyes of his subjects have the appearance of being morally…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The lion cannot protect himself from traps, and the fox cannot defend himself from wolves. One must therefore be a fox to recognize traps, and a lion to frighten wolves.” Machiavelli uses this analogy as an attempt to teach the masses how to embrace their human significance. Machiavelli wrote The Prince at a time where there was political unrest and confusion in Italy, which is why it can be interpreted in many different ways, such as a political satire or epilogue of his political views; however, while the content may be confusing the true meaning of The Prince is to be understood as a satire. Machiavelli is continuously sarcastic through out the course of the novel about the government standings and the changing world.…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He disregards the well being of the people, and instead focuses on the will of the prince. This is evident through his reasoning when providing options for rulers who had just acquired a nation in which the people have lived under liberty and freedom. Machiavelli’s first option is to simply destroy them, citing the Roman’s destruction of Capua, Carthage, and Numantia in their successful endeavor to control a free society. Machiavelli’s disregard for human life, coupled by the fact that he provides methods for ruling without seeking a means of good for the people, allows one to understand his definition of…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays