Comparing Macbeth And Roses That Grew From Concrete

2.) I have determined the following difficulty order of the publications listed above for several reasons. One of the main components in which I ordered the books is comprehension. In Macbeth, its original text took many times of rereading and reanalyzing for me to comfortably move on. This differed much from Roses That Grew From Concrete. This book had an assortment of poems for me to interpret rather than comprehend, causing me to flow through each page quickly (compared to Macbeth). I also based the difficulty order of the publications listed on the length of the novel. The thicker books included much more detail and information to analyze. Throughout the year, my reading selections constantly fluctuated from size, genre, and difficulty. Comparing my ability to comprehend and adequately complete the book were a few of the main reasons in which I ordered the publication above. …show more content…
My most favored book would have to Flowers for Algernon By Daniel Keyes. This book’s composition completely hooked me from the first few pages. Being composed of entry journals rather than the typical large plot, and containing excessive incorrect syntax intrigued me from the gecko. I managed to truly indulge in this novel in an astounding two days, desspite being pressured from a project. My emotions were completely rattled throughout the novel to the point where I was in tears. The themes that I was able to recognized largely attributed to why this book consistently kept my attention. Following Flowers for Algernon would be: Roses That Grew From Concrete, The Great Gatsby, The Husband’s Secret & Among the Hidden. All these books were quite entertaining, but the attributes I listed for Flowers for Algernon slowly declined in the next books I