Comparing Hume's Existence Of God In Cleanthes And Philo

Improved Essays
Hume wrote this dialogue over the course of twenty five years and had it published after his death. He himself was an atheist which was not a typical view at the time, especially in England. That being said, I think he was interested in the theories and possibilities of God and how theists would reason him out. Throughout the entire dialogue, there are arguments from both Cleanthes and Philo where you can see some slight characteristics of Hume. However, I thoroughly see opinions of Hume in Philo more so than Cleanthes or Demea. I say this because the way Philo argues, the need for evidence and realism, is much more akin to a someone who may doubt the existence of God. An example of this is when Philo cites science as the killer of the

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Essay 3 Given what we know or can safely assume to be true of animal brains and behaviors, do animals actually exhibit thought and reason? The answer depends in large measure on one’s definition of thought and reason. Philosophers René Descartes and David Hume hold conflicting views about the nature and possession of thought and reason and, as a result, offer starkly different arguments for and against the existence of thought and reason in animals. While Descartes maintains in Part Five of Discourse on Method that only humans are capable of conscious thought, Hume asserts that human and animal behaviors are not so different in Section Nine of his An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding.…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    He argues that the analogy between the universe and human creations, such as machines is weak, since the universe is not really as obviously similar to a machine as the argument claims. The arrangement, composition, and workings of the universe are extremely different from a man-made machine. He explains that even a single and small difference between the effects of two things can reveal great differences between the causes. This refutation of the argument is plausible, since it shows that an argument from analogy only works effectively when the things we're comparing are extremely similar, but the universe is totally different from a machine or watch. Also, Hume argues that we have only limited exposure to a part of the universe, yet we're taking attributes based on imperfect observations of that small part, such as order, design, and intelligence and using them to make a claim about the whole universe.…

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most individuals generally like to think of themselves as moral human beings. They often directly link their moral judgments to reason alone. However, in the 18th century, Hume made the suggestion that moral judgments could be based on emotions rather than unadulterated reason. In his Moral Philosophy, Hume argues that moral distinctions are not derived from reason, but rather determined by moral emotions: feelings of approval, or disgust felt by spectators who contemplate a moral trait or action (Owen, 1992). Moral judgments find their foundation in an assessment of actions of people with respect to the set of merits ingrained in their society (Haidt, 2001).…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He feels as if there was no “constant”, but instead, a casual contact among perceptions. Locke, however, feels that consciousness is what ties together the mind and body In conclusion, both John Locke and David Hume had interesting ideas on self-identity. While still having credible observations, I feel that Hume, in not accepting anything more than a bundle of impressions, left out much of the human experience, such that when the human is studied solely on a scientific level, without thought to his emotional being, much is left out and misunderstood.…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a critique of Lawrence Krauss’s book A Universe from Nothing, William Lane Craig made the following claim, “The question is, if the universe began to exist and there was not anything before it then how did the universe come into being? It seems to me you have to postulate some sort of a transcendent, immaterial, non-physical reality to bring the universe into existence”. Actually, this is not merely a claim; Craig would like this statement to function as an argument for a particular worldview. Specifically, Craig uses this argument as a proof for the existence of God.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I am going to argue that Blackburn is wrong to claim that the existence of evil strongly suggest that there does not exist a god who is all-good, all-knowing and all-powerful. Exposition - Words (189) Blackburn's argument is that the three characteristics normally attributed to God in any given religion is that he is all powerful, all knowing, and all caring, but that these three qualities cannot resolve itself with the presence of evil in the world. Since evil does exist and is indisputably a part of the world that exists, the characteristics of God must mold itself around its existence. If God is all powerful, then evil only exists at his command.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    1. Last semester I took an Applied Ethics class and one of the philosophers we discussed was Peter Singer who is a utilitarian who believes in maximizing good and minimize harm and suffering. While Singer holds no firm religious belief in his adult life, he understands not all evil can be prevented but as humans we can do our part by at least minimizing it. His theory is, if you see a child drowning in a pond you should save the child. Like Singer, David Hume struggled with the idea of God existing since there is pain and suffering.…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Buddha, Hume, and Mill are the night and day of philosophical theorists. Buddha offers thoughts about consequentialism while Hume teaches sentimentalism. Mill's philosophy about utilitarianism contrasts Hume's sentimentalist theory. The order Buddha, Hume, and Mill is presented diagrams an obscure theory between virtue ethics and utilitarianism. While reviewing these philosophical theorists, they may be considered the yin and yang of philosophical studies.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During this class, which took longer than anticipated, because of unforeseen events, but overall, I enjoyed learning about those philosophers who questioned the norm and sought better understanding. Among those people early on in civilization, life must have been simple, because of a vague understanding of our natural world or any other supernatural questions. Today we can attribute many of our beliefs, customs, and traditions to these people who influenced religion and philosophy. Certainly, those like Plato’s, Plotinus, and Maimonides all contributed to many versions of religion now well established around the world, because they chose to follow a different path towards knowledge. Although, many have grown distant from any type of inter-reflection…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The existence of God, a topic discussed in both William Rowe’s and Robin Collins’ papers, but for two very different reasons. The argument of good vs. evil and the existence of an omnipresent, benevolent being such as God is a topic that many find very difficult to find answers for, and will continue to plague mankind for the rest of our existence. After reading the published works of Mr. Collins and Mr. Rowe, one may find it easier to formulate their own opinion. In the publication by Mr. Collins, he addresses the topic of atheism and theism in respect to physics.…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    David Hume was one of the most influential philosophers of his time and continues to be mentioned and studies to this day. Almost equally as impressive was the response that philosopher Immanuel Kant had to his Inquiry of Human Understanding. Kant attempted to respond to Hume’s ideas and in this essay, I will identify the Hume’s beliefs behind the concepts such as cause, and effect and I will later defend Kant’s response to Hume. He raises points that leave his reader with a deeper understanding of his concept and explicitly outlines his beliefs on the concepts that Hume covers in his Human Inquiry.…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    David Hume and Immanuel Kant are both known for their great contributions to moral philosophy. Hume who is mainly known for his empiricism, skepticism and naturalism and Kant who is best recognized for his great work in metaphysics, ethics and also for his contributions in others disciplines in the area of philosophy. Although they were both exceptional philosophers and gave stupendous apports, Hume and Kant agreed nor differed in various aspect and ideas. Hume believed and is mostly based on his empiricism which involves the theory of the mind. Hume’s empiricism consist in to affirm that the moral foundation is not in the reason but in the senses.…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Of course, Humes only feel religious beliefs can be rational if they have concrete evidence to support. Humes doesn’t question whether God exists or not, but if we as people can come up with a conclusion on Gods nature and being. In respondence to what Aquinas states and his five reason, I believe Humes wouldn’t completely agree with Aquinas. I say this because Humes is all about being rational. If there isn’t enough evidence in the world, he believes that there may not be a way to find out if God a powerful, wise and perfect.…

    • 1606 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, neither has been found truer than the other. Essentially, there is no right or wrong answer. Based on modern scientific views, some may believe that Hume’s ideas have the edge over Descartes. However it does seem ironic considering that Descartes believed that knowledge was only gained through logic and scientific method. His very methods were in turn used against him to prove that his ideas on human understanding have been used to debunk his ideas about…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sheyla Vera Phil 106 Fall 2015 Descartes vs Hume Even though all philosophers claim to have different set of ideas and theories they all basically begin questioning the same thing. From one’s existence, gods existence, and the existence of the soul apart from the body. They all, in some way or another, have argued whether or not another philosopher’s theories are valid or not. When this happens we, as the readers, see the flaws that the previous theory had and then the possible flaws another philosopher might make when argue on the validity of a theory. Hume and Descartes are two philosophers who have argued on how we have come to know what we claim is truth in reference to knowledge, amongst other ideas pertaining to the mind.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays