Comparing Hughes 'I, Too' And Maya Angelou's Still I Rise

Langston Hughes’s “I, Too” and May Angelou’s “Still I Rise” were written about slavery and white oppression. These triumphant writings of the civil rights believers and citizens subjected to slavery are models to the future people. Hughes’s “I, Too” is a poem of the interactions between the white oppressors and blacks during the slavery era. Hughes wrote of mistreatment, a common occurrence of blacks during this time period. This was written to state that despite the view of blacks, they too are a part of America and its people, blacks should be treated equally. Maya Angelou’s “Still I Rise” is the declaration that no matter how hard the black race was knocked down, they would still rise and continue to fight adversity. This poem was written directly to the white oppressors and was meant to explain the black view of survival and pride of their citizenship. “I, Too” and “Still I Rise” are views shared by all blacks, although, these poems were meant to show the world the black view of life and their white counterparts how they viewed their impactful interactions. The first word of “Still I Rise” is an impactful declaration meaning …show more content…
The black society widely accepted this poem as powerful and triumphant writing of its time. This poem was representative of the black view and sparked rebellion of the whites. Langston Hughes’s “I, Too” is written about his story of slavery and unequal treatment between himself and his white counterparts. This writing states that no matter the treatment of blacks, they too are still Americans and will stand for freedom. These poems began a period of independence and civil rights movements in the black community. These poems are representative of the feelings of blacks during this period and how it affected the time line of black