Comparing Hobbes, Socrates, And Madison's Analysis

There are many ideas on how to govern the people, which Hobbes, Nietzsche, and Madison wrote about. Also not just how to govern, but how it relates to nature, the morals, and methods to solve arguments or “factions” among the people. Either the minority groups or majority groups, which Nietzsche consider as the “noble” and “slave.” Hobbes believed in absolute power, because if the people or subject makes their own exclusive judgement of right and wrong based on their moral sense, these will lead to a huge catastrophe or gain more private belongings. Even if the commonwealth is more polished, later on, it will cease to function and discontinue. All these happen, the ruler has less power while the people get it all. Political science deals with …show more content…
Nietzsche disagree with philosopher who also thinks that the first in existence is the superior of all other existence. For example Socrates, a great philosopher. The morals, which Nietzsche disagree and did not quite have a reasonable explanation about a “good” government. Reasons why Nietzsche thinks philosophy is bad, their morals deny the truth about life Nietzsche expresses his comment about moral, it has huge impact on human lives and how history is involved. First, his opinion was way different from philosophers, which he claimed lacks history “for instance, their lack of a sense of history, their hatred for the notion of becoming their Egyptianism.” also, their morals about the origin of something is also the cause of the end of it. Or the fact that we all originate from something, and therefore the first becomes the superior of it all. Nietzsche, being an anti-christ sees the claim that “God” is the “as ens realissmum [the most real being]” was part of decadence. His ideas on morals were base of two types of people, the noble and the …show more content…
Nobler/master features are self creation, the will to command, firm and competitive. These types of people worry less about what is circumstance of other people. They are successful, and push themselves so much which create competition between the nobles. While the slaves are concerned about comfort, less about luxury, wants to feel safe and equality-hard mentality. A slave mentality is responsible for Christian, forgiveness, and are open to new behaviors in creating a society that all about the people. The plant flourishes, thereby increasing in power, just reason doesn’t allow it to grow. What allows it to grow are passion and appetite. We call the flower good, because it dominating. Passion is what drives us to succeed, or dominate and meeting our goals. Appetite is meeting our repetitive needs, while reason is a tool to get what we want. To dominate, the slaves tends to look up on the nobles with jealousy due to, how big and tall,talented and successful they are. These slaves work together to impose laws which turn out to weaken the nobles.
Hobbes perspective is preferable, because he talks about the characteristics of people. Although, we as human are full of all these traits, it’s still impossible to have no leader.