Tribunus Plebis Analysis

Improved Essays
In 285 B.C. (Mark, “Roman Empire”), Rome had one of the largest empires in the world at this time and in history. In fact they controlled and conquered lands formerly know as Britannia, Hispania, Achaea, Judea, and the North African coast (Trueman, “The Roman Empire”). Therefore to of conquered such huge areas and take control of these people, they would of had to have great officials and armies to lead, but even to control the people of Rome itself. This is why the government created several military branches with their own leaders that were placed in charge of certain things, places, and people. Such as a Roman tribune, who were considered highly ranked in the military and had authority over the people of Rome. A Roman tribunes main focus …show more content…
The tribunus plebis were set up in place to protect the rights and laws of the plebeians(Lindering, “Tribune”). At this time they were allowed to refuse orders from the counsel, the praetors who were the administrative of justice(Lindering, “Praetors”), and the quators who controlled their money(Lindering,”Quators”). They were also at the top of them, which meant they took over the election that was in charge of picking the person who was in control of the games and temples ,but also were responsible for helping the poorest of the plebeians. As time passed they were allowed more authority in having the right to call a senate meeting into order, or arrest officials such as lawmakers in the system(Lindering, …show more content…
It starts out with the two walking around until they stumble upon two men, a cobbler and carpenter just roaming around not in their work clothes. This is was strange because it was a work day and not just them, but everyone wasn 't working. So they start to question these two in which one of these are being difficult and won 't tell what he is, which is getting Murellus mad. Until Flavius ask again why they aren 't in their shops, and one replies because they are celebrating Caesar 's triumph over Pompey. Immediately Murellus is heated because the people of Rome are acting two faced and they aren 't acting loyal. He even goes on to say the people should be punished because of the way they are acting because they are showing no gratitude or respect towards Pompey. The man who did numerous of things for them and they were just cheering for him, now they are acting like they don 't even care if he is dead. Still upset he says to Flavius if there are any of Caesar 's statues with any sign of decorations they will go around and take all of down because he doesn 't believe that Caesar should be looked up as a good guy. They both see and compare Caesar to a bird that needs its feathers plucked, so he won 't get too high because already he is seen as someone who is cocky and full of himself. This is scene that just took place is important because it is showing the characteristics and true

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Although they have a lot of lands to control, they had to constantly fight to defend their growing empire whilst conquering new land. As a result to this, the Romans needed a powerful army thus having the plebeians (lower rank) to also join the fight by…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roman Empire Dbq Analysis

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages

    After about 250 years of hard work, the world's largest Empire fell into ruin. The Roman Empire lasted from approximately 50 BCE to 200 CE. At its peak, the Empire was about 2400 miles long taking control of all area surrounding the Mediterranean Sea. During its rule, the empire became very strong and complex featuring Gladiator fights for entertainment along with an army that couldn’t be matched by any other. Unfortunately, as all good things do, Rome met its end.…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rome, during its later years, formed control through emperors, military generals who took control of the state through military force. Their soldiers became more and more loyal to them instead of the state, encouraged by promises of land in the empire. This led to Rome’s continuous land expansion, as they needed more and more areas to give to their loyal fighters. However, forces soon spread too thinly across Rome’s great many borders, and the empire could not protect itself as much as it needed to, for maintaining so many borders was expensive.…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roman Empire Dbq Analysis

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “A house divided against itself cannot stand.” This is part of one of President Lincoln famous speeches on equality, at a time of civil war. By understanding the mistakes of past civilizations, society can ensure that we do not meet the same fate as certain civilizations, such as the Roman Empire. The small community of Rome began its formation around the year 750 BCE. With the fall of the Greeks in 200 BCE, Rome had conquered most of the land in Europe, some land in Africa, and parts of the Middle East and Asia.…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rome and Persia were both successful empires, but they were both very different in the way their empires worked and expanded. There were some similarities the empires shared such as conquering vast amounts of land, political advancements, and bureaucracy. Despite these similarities, there were much more differences with these two empires. One of the reasons Rome expanded was because of its disciplined military. They could also support their big population with the military, and in their military they had skilled archers and horsemen.…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Roman Republic is traditionally dated from 509 BC to 27 BC, becoming established with the overthrow of the Roman Kingdom and was destroyed with the development of the Roman Empire. When considering the fall of the Roman Republic, it is clear that the reorganisation of the army, particularly through the actions of Marius, Sulla and Caesar, contributed greatly to the disempowerment of the Senate and therefore the Republic. Through the undoubtedly instrumental Marian reforms, the Roman social and militant structure was altered permanently, a design that was manipulated and built upon through the course of Sulla and Caesar’s political careers. Through all of this factors, it is unquestionable that the changing composition of the Roman Army…

    • 1791 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These consuls were in charge of governmental decisions, choosing officials, and commanding the Roman army. The only things that had a higher authority that the consuls were the emperor’s commands, and the laws of the…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The tribunes were not Senators but spoke for the plebeians in the Senate and with the consuls.(6-5) Eventually the tribunes were given the ability to elect a lawmaking body called the Counsel of Plebs that could make laws for Plebeians but not…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The group of men in the Roman Senate were responsible for war policy, controlling lands, government decisions and making laws. The Roman government having the Roman Senate was good because the Senate was their way of keeping the government stable. In the Roman Senate there were only 300 men, which is a very small number of…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He started off using pathos by saying, “not that i loved Caesar less but that i loved Rome more. ”(III.2.23-24). This wins over the crowd because it shows that because he loves them he was protecting them. He then uses logos by asking “who here is so rude that they not be a Roman?”(III.2.32-33). This is using the logic that everyone in the crowd is a proud Roman and if they are all proud Romans than they should rather have Caesar dead than alive.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the period of 1150 B.C.E up until about 300 B.C.E the interaction between the Persian, Greek, Roman and Byzantine empires have shaped each culture. Through war, trade, religion, migration and expansion these Empire have clashed, and merged and scattered. Although Each Empire varies in core values, government, literature and art, it is easy to find connections to one another through the timeline of each individual Empire. The competition for territory and advancements pushed these cultures forward, in action and reaction to each other; each empire effected one another in unique ways. Some values and beliefs and customs carried on through time, changed to fit the needs of the individual culture or were tossed out altogether.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, Antony intelligently and subtly leads them back over to supporting Caesar. After degrading Brutus’ ethos, he reminds the crowd of their love for Caesar, “You all did love him once, not without case; / What cause withholds you then to mourn for him?” This rhetorical question allows him to include the people in his speech. He draws a parallel back to the opening scene of the play where Murellus and Flavius accuse the commoners of having forgotten Pompey. This reminds them of their well-established love for Caesar as they begin to sway back to his side.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Roman Republic was in control of many regions and not all of these inhabitants were delighted with the current circumstances, especially the citizens in Rome. During the period of the expansion of Rome, the government was becoming less democratic and started displaying signs of an oligarchy. The Senate of the Roman Republic was the prime branch of government. This was comprised of leaders from the patricians, the noble, and wealthy families of ancient Rome. Members of the senate were not elected but were chosen by the Consuls.2 The senate’s main task was to direct spending and verdicts associating with foreign powers.…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mesopotamia and Rome were two civilizations that were both highly impactful on world history. Even today, we can see themes that have transcended centuries. One of the themes that linked these two superpowers together was expansionism, a force that both built and destroyed these empires. As leaders in many spheres of government and culture, it was no surprise the rulers wanted to expand their borders. In this essay, I will dive more into this, exploring what each did to ensure permanent strength and sway in their time.…

    • 1879 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If you have strength in numbers then you are favored to win in most situations. The Plebeians are always shown in groups, never by themselves and they never have deep thoughts about what they are deciding on. Their decisions are spur of the moment. At the end of the book, we are considered to be Plebeians because our opinions change as well. An argument can be made for whether the Plebeians are easily manipulable or that the conspirators are just really pervasive.…

    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays