Comparing Brutus And Marc Antony In The Tragedy Of Julius Caesar

Decent Essays
Julius Caesar was a successful war general that was going to get the throne of Rome and ruin it forever. Julius was assassinated by people close to him and after his death 2 people Brutus and Marc Antony make speeches about Caesar and his life. In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, the two men were on different sides of the plot but they still got the points across they wanted to sway the crowd, one was more successful than the other. I am going to talk about the differences, more differences, the similarities and then argue who is more effective as a speaker.
Brutus sided with the conspirators early in the play, at first he was not really into it, then he is pushing forward the plan to kill Caesar. Marc Antony is a dear friend to Caesar and will do anything to get revenge on the conspirators. To start off with, the position of the speaker is very important. Brutus stands above the crowd (scene 2, line 13) and Marc Antony is among the crowd (scene 2 line 74). The different positions among the crowd states the atmosphere of the speech. Brutus was there to tell them in scene 2, line 23 that killing Julius Caesar was best for the empire, while Marc Antony was pleading in scene
…show more content…
The crowd’s reactions were very much similar in the fact that they were ready to carry him home or do exactly what they say like kill someone.(scene 2, lines 79 and 205) The emotions of the speech are also very similar with confident yet arrogant speeches each saying that they will save or have saved the Roman empire.(scene 2 lines 27 and 101) Another similarity of speeches were double meaning of words. Brutus and Mark Antony both used ambition as a words that meant a desire to achieve success and then ambition as just a strong desire to do something. Brutus used ambitious twice in his short speech and Antony used it 8 times eventually getting a fair amount of

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Marc Antony's speech included him talking about Julius Caesar and everything he did to make Rome a better place. He explained to the people how Julius Caesar wanted to help them and he did. He reassured the people that the king was a great person and didn't only want to rule. Brutus had a different opinion when it came to Julius Caesar. He didn't like the way the king ruled and he wanted all the power to himself.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus delivers a speech defending his actions, and for the moment, the crowd is on his side. However, Mark Antony, with a subtle and eloquent speech, deftly turns public opinion against the assassins by manipulating the emotions of the common people. There is method in his rhetorical speech and gestures: he reminds them of the good Caesar had done for Rome, his sympathy with the poor, and his refusal of the crown at the Lupercal, thus questioning Brutus' claim of Caesar's ambition. He shows Caesar's corpse to the crowd to have them shed tears and gain sympathy for their fallen hero; and he reads Caesar's will, in which every Roman citizen would receive money. Antony rouses the mob to drive the conspirators from Rome.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony’s speech ultimately leads to a battle between him and the conspirators. Brutus has good intentions, but nevertheless he makes a lot of bad decisions which eventually leads to his…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    His point is important in his argument because it uses the emotions of the audience as a way for them to feel anger towards Caesar, ultimately allowing them to realize that under Caesar, they would be slaves. Out of the arguments Marc Antony and Brutus presented, Brutus had the stronger of the two. Brutus used this argument and emotion to get the pulpit to agree with him because the audience can easily comprehend what he is saying and he presents it in such a way that if Caesar were not to have been killed, this slavery would have been the only…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pathos In Julius Caesar

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Brutus on the other hand, uses only facts which doesn’t give much credibility and there is no bond between him and the crowd. Antony’s precise word choice allows him to even combine pathos and ethos in one phrase. For example, towards the end of the funeral speech, Antony says “But yesterday the word of Caesar might have stood against the world: now he lies there.” Antony appeals to the empathy of the crowd by making them feel sad about his death, especially when he says “now he lies there”. He also shows Caesar was morally good because Caesar was willing to stand against the world just for…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After Brutus’ speech the crowd supports his decision, they believe Caesar was corrupt and he had to die. Next Marc Antony, Julius Caesar’s right hand man, stepped up to talk. In his speech he used pathos to pull at the crowd’s emotions and logos to remind them why they loved Caesar. “He was my friend, faithful and just to me.” Antony says, “He hath brought many captives home to Rome… When the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept.”…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Power is one of the most desirable things in life. Everyone longs for it. However, power can be very dangerous. Julius Caesar shows this by conveying a theme that power can be deadly to those who are not careful. The first example of this is that Caesar is in a position of power and ends up being killed because of it.…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Act III, Antony stands in front of the group of Plebeians after they have just listened to Brutus, the conspirator’s, reasonings as to why Caesar deserved his death. Mark Antony uses compelling rhetoric, to switch their mindsets, so the commoners pledge to his words instead of Brutus’s. Some may believe Brutus’s leadership skills make him a great speaker, but Mark Antony’s powerful, raw words…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To bring them out of this, it is important that Brutus joins the conspiracy to guide Rome away from the type of rule Caesar used and serve as a better leader. At the time after Caesar’s death, the Romans are confused, and can be easily manipulated. They will believe whatever they may hear. When Brutus speaks at Caesar’s funeral, he immediately turns the crowd from rambunctious and hassled to content with Caesar’s death. Minutes later, Antony convinces the same crowd to avenge Caesar’s death.…

    • 1403 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Julius Caesar and Brutus: A Comparison In the Shakespearean Classic Julius Caesar, many intricate characters are presented and compounded throughout the storyline. However, I will focus on the two main characters from this play, and compare their morals and personalities, to decide which one is the better man. In this essay, three main points will be presented. Caesars faults, morals, and actions Brutus 's faults, morals, and actions Which one seems to be the more needed in Rome By the end of this comparison essay, I hope to have shown the characters for who they are, and how they act, along with their basic morals.…

    • 1483 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People are listening to what he is saying then when he takes his pauses, they all call out saying on how bad the conspirators are. This is where I think the two different speeches differ the most. For example, where I said before where between Brutus and the crowd, how they are saying how they want him to be king and everything, and then where Antony has everyone riled up and ready to revolt and kill the conspirators.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony has to slowly plant doubt and anxiety that perhaps Brutus was wrong; that although he is a good and honorable man, Brutus could have just murdered another good man, who was only doing good for Rome. Antony uses his words to manipulate the people’s minds much better than Brutus did. The people know that Antony was Caesar’s good friend and the good things he is saying about Caesar are credible. Since Antony is changing the crowd’s perspective about who Caesar was, his continuous good remarks about Brutus keep them from getting angry and…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The play “Julius Caesar” explained two men named Brutus and Antony who both presented speeches in front of their town with different meanings about the assassination of Caesar. Antony had to ask Brutus for permission to speak at Caesar’s funeral. His despairing emotion and speech drawed the crowds special attention. Antony speech does not show any praise of caesar but does show sympathy and memorable memories that caesar did for his town. This whole situation sums a complete catastrophe.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar written by William Shakespeare, there are two speeches regarding the same topic that are presented to the public. Both Mark Antony and Brutus delivered speeches after the death of Julius Caesar, consisting of their opinion and explanation of what has happened and why, for the needs of the Roman people. Both of the speeches have a very distinct and different purpose, and appealed to different mental senses of the crowd (Ethos, Logos, and Pathos). As Mark Antony 's words were favored and followed, riots broke out and Rome was indescribably angry and upset upon the tragedy of Julius Caesar. This event foreshadowed the conclusion of the story, and set the scene for the following conflicts that reeked havoc upon Rome…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus Speech Analysis

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Which makes it seem like the people in the crowd are participating and forming their own opinions, when Brutus is really forming their thoughts for them knowing that everyone is going to give the same answer. During Mark Antony’s speech he uses the same technique, using repetition and rhetorical questions to prove that Caesar was not ambitious. He states, “He hath brought many captives home to rome,/ Whose ransoms did the general coffers fill./ Did this in Caesar seem ambitious? . . . You all did see that on Lupercal/ I thrice presented him a kingly crown,/ which he did thrice refuse.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays