Comparing Brutus And Cassius In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar

Improved Essays
Brutus and Cassius, who are two of the main conspirators against Julius Caesar, share a common goal, but act uniquely in achieving it, based on their beliefs. The unique methods used by each man are based off of their philosophies, and are actually similar to each other. Brutus and Cassius are supporters of contrasting philosophies, but the influence of the philosophies on each man is similar. The actions, goals, and ideas of each man is shaped and influenced by their mindset. Through juxtaposition and paralleling scenes in Julius Caesar, William Shakespeare, the author, illustrates the connections between Brutus and Cassius. Stoicism and Epicureanism are almost opposite to each other, but the few similarities between the two can be seen in the actions of Brutus and Cassius. …show more content…
He includes a situation so that the reader can observe the different reactions and decisions of each man in response to them. A great example of this is the debate on whether to kill Antony or not. While Brutus represents a Stoic view, and says that it would be “too bloody” (II.i.164) and unreasonable to kill Antony, Cassius wants to be free of anxiety, therefore stating that Antony should die because he “[fears him]” (II.i.186). This juxtaposition is used to help the reader understand that Brutus and Cassius are foils of each other, and here especially, it is understood that their philosophies play a major role in why they are foils. Another juxtapositional event occurs when Brutus begins to questions his thoughts and intentions. He finds most of his issues “only proper to himself” (I.ii.43), and internal conflicts. Cassius, in contrast, is always confident in himself, and in his confidence he is able to maintain healthy relationships with those around him, unlike Brutus during his troubled

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    ]/ Let Antony and Caesar fall together” (II.ii.157-163). Brutus then responds, “Our course will seem too bloody, Caius Cassius, / […] / For Antony is but a limb of Caesar” (II.ii.164-167). This conversation demonstrates the arrogance of Brutus and the disagreements between Brutus and Cassius. Their loyalty struggles at times, especially when it comes to decision making.…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What do Brutus’ and Antony’s use of literary devices tell the reader about their personalities and their intentions? Brutus and Antony both use literary devices like repetition, pathos, ethos, logos, and irony. In his funeral speech for Caesar, Antony over uses pathos t gain the emotional support of the plebeians. Antony says, “My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar. And I must pause till it come back to me” (Shakespeare lll.ii.104)…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus is a well-respected senator, who is approached by Cassius and informed of the plot. He deliberates over whether to become involved in the conspiracy (Moss). This deliberation separates him from Cassius. Brutus’s honesty and simplicity are also in clear contrast to Antony’s qualities of deception and over-ambition. Cassius believes that the nobility of Rome are responsible for the government of Rome.…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This step is further influenced by Cassius slyly changing Brutus’s mind about Caesar, because Cassius sees Caesar as no more than a man (Taylor). However, this plot makes him dishonorable to the Roman society. Attempting to keep Rome safe, Brutus and the other…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar” by William Shakespeare. The characters Antony and Cassius are shielded by their appearance on the outside; innocent and bringing justice to Rome. Thus, these false outward showings enable these morally compromised men to use their manipulative rhetoric that unleashes chaos upon their city that,furthermore causes Brutus,a naive man, to create a coordinated plan to kill Caesar a man he was loyal to, because of Cassius's use of rhetoric and leads to uproar and chaotic acts done by the people of Rome because of Antony’s use of rhetoric during a speech. After Cassius in a speech had proclaimed to his friend Brutus. That they are being undermined by Caesar and slowly but surely are giving him the power to destroy…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony’s repetition of Brutus’ Character makes the audience believe that Brutus was in fact not a principled man like they have been led to believe and now see him as a…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In William Shakespeare’s tragedy, “Julius Caesar,” Brutus and Antony portrayed two antagonizing reactions after Caesar’s regicide. This scene not only lays the framework for the rest of the play, but also exemplifies the personality traits of Brutus and Antony. Their persuasion throughout their monologues helps to rally the plebeians in support of their causes. In response, this scene marks a turning point in the play and subsequently foreshadows Brutus’ murder. It shows how Brutus’ actions and words eventually lead to his decimation, especially with the help of Antony’s coaxing of the plebeians.…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Julius Caesar Quotes

    • 1520 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Inside the Mind of Brutus A particular character, Brutus, from a Shakespearean play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, was quite intriguing. Brutus was a friend of Julius Caesar, but was quickly pulled into the conspiracy plot to kill Julius Caesar. Throughout the play, Brutus sticks to his moral ethics closely. Moreover, Brutus says, “For let the gods so speed me, as I love the name of honor more than I fear death” (1.2.88-89).…

    • 1520 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Well, Brutus, thou art noble. Yet I see Thy honorable mettle may be wrought from that it is disposed"(1.2.302-305). When Caesar comes home with a victory, Cassius is upset because he is not fawned of Caesar due to Caesar becoming king. Cassius then decides to take his left hand man ,Brutus, in and devise a plan. He starts to implant in Brutus mind that it is all for the good of Rome.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although people generally believe they are persuaded by ideas that they have discovered, William Shakespeare’s historic tragedy, Julius Caesar illustrates that an individual’s thoughts are inevitably shaped by external factors. Persuasion and suggestion are rhetorical skills that play central roles in Julius Caesar, but they also demonstrates how individuals bend towards words they want to hear when faced with a difficult situation. The play cautions the dangers and powers of rhetoric as a tool for manipulation and reminds us how easily and completely an audience can be both won and lost in terms of persuasion. In the few early scenes we are able to see Cassius promoting his own views upon Brutus.…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Julius Caesar Flaws

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Cassius in malevolently writhing to himself about how he can easily manipulate Brutus by simply turning his honorable intentions against himself, and of course Brutus we end up trusting Cassius and stabs his best friend, whom he says he…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus Eulogy Analysis

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Shakespeare created Brutus and Cassius as foils, highlighting Cassius’ proclivity for emotions and Brutus’s preference for reason. As revealed in the speech, “[Cassius’] emotions [would] patter on [his] door, but Brutus’/Would…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Julius Caesar Sacrifice

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Throughout The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Shakespeare’s usage of central ideas develops a suspenseful theme in the play. In the midst of turmoil between the tribunes and Caesar, Shakespeare made Caesar’s death a “sacrifice” rather than a “butchery”. The first three acts of the play portray the relationship between Caesar and those who conspire against him. Amongst the conspirators, Caesar is seen as a tyrant over the people of Rome.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because of this writing style, Shakespeare shows the audience internal conflict in his characters. Marcus Brutus was a very hesitant character, he constantly second guessed his decisions and pondered whether they were the correct choice. In the article Brutus’ Personal Failure is the Central Tragedy, the author says, “Brutus is the only one of the conspiritors who is portrayed as inwardly debating the justification for commiting the ‘dreadful thing’”. Almost immediately after the brutal stabbing of Caesar, Brutus doubts his hasty decision. On one hand, the killing of Caesar stopped the tyrannical reign and would hopefully restore freedom to all of Rome.…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    First, Brutus possesses the fatal flaw of being easily manipulated/tricked. This ultimately is Brutus’s downfall as he is easily controlled by his peers. In the beginning of play, Brutus is seen upset and “at war” with himself. Cassius attempts to boost his mood, by telling him how well-respected he is.…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays