Examples Of Ambition In Julius Caesar

Improved Essays
On March 15, 44 BC, Brutus killed Julius Caesar for the freedom and protection of Rome. According to Brutus he says, “I rejoice at it; as he was valiant, I honor him but as he was ambitious, I slew him.” (ll. 26-27). Another reason as to why he killed him was his ambition. Perhaps Brutus thought that Caesar had too much ambition. Which begs two questions did Caesar have too much ambition? Moreover, what was Caesar so ambitious about? In this essay, I am going to talk about Brutus’ funeral speech and whether it was more effective than Antony’s, what rhetorical appeals did both Brutus and Antony use, and if having too much ambition is a bad thing. In my opinion, Brutus had the better funeral speech he was unequivocal on why he killed Caesar and did not try to make friends with the people that did not accept what he did to help Rome. In Antony’s funeral speech, he is very repetitive for example, he says, “For Brutus is an honorable man.” (l. 90). Then he says it again, “And Brutus is an honorable man.” (l. 95). …show more content…
Caesar was killed just for having ambition. Maybe the determination to make everyone slaves. With all that said Brutus did have the better funeral speech than Antony, he not only spoke about why he killed Caesar he commemorated him as his friend that he had so much love for. Antony did not really entice the reader with his speech to summarize what he said is Brutus is an honorable man (x3 times), Caesar did not have any ambition because he brought captives home to Rome and the money brought great wealth to the city, Antony tried to give Caesar a kingly crown and he refused three times, and the people should love Caesar as they once did. These statements do not entice the reader Antony should have talked more about the bad that Caesar did. He should have refuted Brutus’ argument of him having to kill Caesar because he was trying to make them all

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Can death be dignified? Is death the only thing that can be dignified? There are three tragedies that deal with the concept of dignified death and what makes it dignified. In the Greek tragedy Antigone by Sophocles, King Creon indirectly causes the deaths of many because he selfishly keeps a girl from honoring her dead brother. In the tragedy Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, Brutus kills his best friend for the good of the majority.…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pathos In Julius Caesar

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Brutus on the other hand, uses only facts which doesn’t give much credibility and there is no bond between him and the crowd. Antony’s precise word choice allows him to even combine pathos and ethos in one phrase. For example, towards the end of the funeral speech, Antony says “But yesterday the word of Caesar might have stood against the world: now he lies there.” Antony appeals to the empathy of the crowd by making them feel sad about his death, especially when he says “now he lies there”. He also shows Caesar was morally good because Caesar was willing to stand against the world just for…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus funeral speech was more effective due to his use of pathos, ethos, and logos. In this speech, Brutus uses pathos to get the citizens of Rome on his side. His use pathos to get the citizens to believe that Caesar death was necessary. For example, he mentions on how if Caesar were living they all die slaves.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout his argument, Antony uses repetition sarcastically to emphasize his point to the audience. Antony knows the crowd admires Brutus so at first he says, “Brutus is an honorable man..”(line 83), to essentially “pull the rope back.” He knows that going against Brutus straight out, will anger the crowd. However, as the argument progresses, the more the line is repeated, the further its meaning changes, and the phrase becomes a joke.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After close examination it is clear to see that Antony's use of Ethos, Pathos, and logos is far more persuasive than Brutus argument. Anthony's words strike the word of Brutos. At the beginning of Brutus's speech, he instantly uses ethos by telling the people to remember his honor, which is effective and catches the audience's attention. He remind the audience of his wisdom so they will more easily believe him.…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In fact, upon seeing the death of Brutus, Antony proclaimed ,“This was the noblest Roman of them all. / All the conspirators save only he / Did that they did in envy of great Caesar” (5. 5. 74-76). Unlike the rest of the conspirators, Brutus killed Caesar because he truly believed that he was helping the Roman Republic prosper and free itself from Caesar’s future tyranny.…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Brutus and Antony gave two very distinct speeches at the funeral of Ceasar. Brutus appeals to reason and logic while Antony appeals to emotions. Brutus is more of an introvert, solitary philosopher and the speech is in total character. He goes on to explain his reason for killing Ceasar. In his opening remarks Brutus states: Hear me for my cause, Believe me for mine honor and have respect to mine honor, that you may believe me in your wisdom and awake your senses that you may the better judge.…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Antony's speech was more personal than it was when Brutus was speaking. Antony's opening to his speech was more approchable than it was when Brutus had open. He starts off with "I come here to bury Caesar, not to praise him. " Although he starts off with that Antony does nothing but praise him.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus’s reasoning…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, he was not easily convinced to join the conspiracy. As a senator, his goal was to make Rome the best it could be. For him to take such trouble in deciding whether to kill Caesar or not, it shows that Brutus only wanted the best for his country and his people. Brutus says, “It must be by his death: and for my part/ I know no personal cause to spurn at him/ But for the general good.” (II.i.10-12).…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the two speeches made by Brutus and Antony at Caesar’s funeral, both characters used different methods in persuading the audience. Taking into mind who the audience was, what they knew about what had occurred, and how the information was presented all contributed to the way that the audience perceived it. While Brutus used more logos, or the use of logic and reason, while Antony used pathos to appeal to the Roman people’s emotions (Delaney). Both speeches also used different rhetorical devices to sway the crowd. With that being said, one speech proved more effective than the other.…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus’ speech rationalized Caesar’s murder by using logic and reasoning because he did not want the plebeians to turn on him. Therefore, he believed that he could persuade the crowd by using reasoning. Brutus states, “As Caesar loved me, I weep for him;/ as he was fortunate I rejoice at it; as he was/ valiant, I honour him: but, as he was ambitious, I/ slew him”(3.2.24-27). This quote conveyed that Brutus loved Caesar, but he loved Rome more and that Caesar needed to be killed because he became too ambitious. Additionally, Brutus wanted the people to know that he loved Caesar by stating that he was very valiant and honorable.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Battle of the Speeches According to John Morley, “Three things matter in a speech - who says it, how he says it, and what he says, and of the three, the latter matters the least.” John understancds that how the speaker presents himself and his ideas can change the side of the crowd, more than any word they could have said. When Brutus and Antony give their funeral speeches in Julius Caesar it is a critical moment for each. Both need to sway the crowd to agree with their perspective.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony showed remorse and a bit of happiness saying his speech at Caesar’s funeral. Happiness came from him describing his Captain (Caesar) as a person. Reciting memories and good times they shared. Although, he didn’t praise Caesar is his speech as he reminded the crowd in his speech “I came to bury Caesar, not praise him.” Antony still shows he loves Caesar by saying “My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar, and I must pause till it come back to me.”…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar written by William Shakespeare, there are two speeches regarding the same topic that are presented to the public. Both Mark Antony and Brutus delivered speeches after the death of Julius Caesar, consisting of their opinion and explanation of what has happened and why, for the needs of the Roman people. Both of the speeches have a very distinct and different purpose, and appealed to different mental senses of the crowd (Ethos, Logos, and Pathos). As Mark Antony 's words were favored and followed, riots broke out and Rome was indescribably angry and upset upon the tragedy of Julius Caesar. This event foreshadowed the conclusion of the story, and set the scene for the following conflicts that reeked havoc upon Rome…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays