Comparing Aristotle's Poem Of A Man, Roko Belic And Happy

Happiness is a concept that is sharply debated on its value, what it stands for, and how far we should go to attain it. The clear and present truth that there are different levels of happiness, and the end result for happiness differs on basis of each person’s desires, ambitions, and means to achieve it. Too often we witness those burn themselves out in their effort to become happy, and likewise so when people throw away everything they have and are content to just exist. Even in today’s sophisticated world with a highly advanced culture, we as humans still struggle to agree on this simple concept that is a core fundamental to our existence. Many well-known writers and philosophers have touched on this issue in length, and likewise present their own interpretation on “what is happiness.” Throughout this paper, you will witness a breakdown of several acclaimed authors who attempt to touch on the subject, analyzing how their present their argument on “happiness” and compare that to how the other authors mentioned hold up. These authors include Aristotle and The Aim of a Man, Roko Belic and Happy, …show more content…
He also uses clear rhetorical strategies to both set the tone for his argument and likewise cement it. As a result Aristotle remains a classic reference for human philosophy in regards to happiness. Perhaps the only true issue is how dated his piece is, since his assessment took place thousands of years ago, and his audience followed different cultural practices than today’s global culture. However, considering his claims provide intricate context to happiness in today’s society, there is significant justification to compare Aristotle to his other peers mentioned in this