Comparing Aristotle's Mixed State And The Constitution Of 1787

Improved Essays
A demonstration is needed to describe the following correlation between Aristotle's mixed state and the Constitution of 1787(of America.) More precisely, how the Constitution of 1787 can be seen as a implementation of Aristotle’s mixed state. Three examples will be shown to demonstrate three elements of the mixed state. These three elements are the monarchist component, the aristocratic component, and the democratic component. Monarchy starts off as our first component to the mixed state. The president is a great example of some ruler who enforces the rules of the land. Specifically, the president’s powers in leading the army seems like a monarchist way of leading a army. The check to the president’s power would then be handed off to the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Analysis Of US V. Curtiss

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Many people tend to wonder the actual power of the president. Is it just a title? Or is he secretly the most powerful man; much like a dictator? Well, by going back in time to specific court cases that could have swayed either way, one can easily tell that the president has more powers than everyone thinks. Many think that issues involving wars and foreign relations are solely powers given to the President, but these powers can be tested when problems occur that are not clearly stated in his job description.…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As the United States expanded territorially and developed economically, the scope and reach of federal power and control increased in unison with widening interpretations of the Constitution. In “American Sovereigns: The People and America’s Constitutional Tradition Before the Civil War”, Fritz outlines the paradigm shift of Americans moving from being both rulers and ruled to simply being ruled, and the accompanying changes in constitutional interpretation that caused this. Fritz highlights the consistent movement away from a Jeffersonian constructivist constitutional interpretation of a weak central government to the Hamiltonian view that the constitution created a strong central government through implied powers, and it is a living breathing…

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    After a very traumatic experience with monarchies, the Voirpoua esd Flesil civilization decided not to have a monarchy for their government. Their government was a lot like our government today. Expect without a president. The people would choose representatives to work together to make the big decisions. Like declaration of war or relocation of the civilization.…

    • 89 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus, a pseudonym for Robert Gates, was an Anti-Federalist who was against the signing of the Constitution. He wrote to the citizens of New York many documents on his views and why the United States should not be under this new government. In his first paper, he talked about how Congress, the new body of government, could undermine the States under certain circumstances. Also he proposed reasons why this new way of ruling could not rule over such a vast territory that this brand new country came upon on. Many of Brutus’ examples and reasoning still exists in today’s modern era in which these contemporary political circumstances still impact us daily.…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Great Seal Analysis

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In addition to the difference over representation, American views of their constitutions diverged from her mother country in regard to the source of authority for a constitution, and whether a constitution should be written and fixed or whether it should be more fluid. In May of 1776 a congressional resolution officially “advising the colonies to adopt new governments under the authority of the people” (65). In the constitution making that followed in 1776 and 1777 states relied on the principle of popular sovereignty espoused by the colonists in the previous decade. In an effort to prevent future tyranny, American states forwent the English notion of a constitution, “the existing arrangement of government-that is, laws, customs, and institutions together with the principles they embodied,” in favor of “single written document… outlining the powers of government and specifying the rights of citizens” (66).…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Under the Articles of Confederation, the federal government was considered weak because it has no authority over interstate and foreign trade matter. States are free to conduct their own respective business and the federal government has no say to whatever states do. So, with states acting like its own sovereign nation rather than a type of government under the federal government, the relationship between the two government is chaotic. In this paper, I am going to discuss further details about why federal government was considered weak under the Articles of Confederation and the changes that were written into the Constitution of the United States that solves the interrelationship problem between the federal and states under the Articles of…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Compare and contrast U.S. and Roman Constitution The Roman Republic and the United States comparisons are valid. The United States adopted many of the Roman Republic politicals systems of government. When one takes a closer look in the United States form of the government, it would be safe to say that the two are similar in every aspect. The Roman Republic also influenced the founder's fathers of the United States with many brilliant ideas.…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosophers are often criticized for their ideas because people in the society we live In are afraid of change. Aristotle is a human who did nothing to harm people but spread his philosophy about the “true” and “corrupt” government, as he believed that his philosophy would provide the “best opportunity to lead a good life.” (Atkinson 43) His ideas ridiculed, Aristotle tried to teach people that citizens under a defective government will become interested with the pursuits of a ruler, but not the pursuits of a ruling class. Aristotle founded a school of his own, where people would learn and ponder about a true form of government, but the world we live in has pushed aside the ideas of what Aristotle believed was a corrupt government.…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Anti-Federalist Papers, which is a series of articles against the formation of a large federal government, emerged after the United Sates Constitution was drafted. The Anti-Federalist Papers include the many concerns of a writer by the name of Brutus. As a response John Jay, Alexander Hamilton, and James Madison wrote multiple responses in favor of the formation of the federal government under one pen name; Publius. The examination of the Anti-Federalist Papers with the response of the Federalist Papers display the various agreements with overlapping ideals that were expressed after the creation of the United States Constitution. The competing works of Brutus and Publius demonstrate similar themes such as a supporting a limited and republican…

    • 1762 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Confederation and the Constitution In the mid 1780’s following the Revolutionary War depression struck our new nation. Faced with such economic troubles the question arose regarding the stability of American democracy. There was a strong need for change and many believed it needed to start with a more centralized government. While the opposition believed that having a strong centralized government would lead to the same oppression and tyranny that America had fought to overcome.…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1781, after six years of death, detrimental losses and defeat, the previously termed “American patriots” had fought and secured their independence from the world’s greatest empire, and could now call themselves true “Americans.” This fervent nationalist and patriotic spirit that spread throughout the 13 colonies in 1781, also increased when Americans realized they could govern, and they created their own system of government—one which disregarded concepts like a mixed government, the power of the executive, or a strong central government. Such concepts, which were considered fundamental aspects of a “republic” and “free state”, were thrown out due to a massive renunciation of all things British. This new, decentralized government, illustrated…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    State power was exemplified through its organization of congress, where each state had one vote and 9/13 states had to support a law in order for it to be passed. Furthermore, the national government didn’t have an executive or judicial organization. Thus congress lacked the power to tax, regulate trade, or control coinage. With the period of discontent, economic crisis and collapse of Revolutionary expectations that came from the Articles, there was a proposition for redirecting this crumbling…

    • 1927 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the book, by the author Carol Berkin “A Brilliant Solution: Inventing the American Constitution ”, analyzes the United States’ memorable progress in 1786, which was a few years after their independence was claimed. The author essentially explains how the Constitution was established, and who was involved in constructing it. Berkin also discusses in great detail the different attributes and the life’s of the founding fathers that influenced what our nation is today. Berkin’s purpose is to acknowledge and enlightened the readers of the document, the American Constitution as we see it today. Further in the book she accentuates that the main creators of this significant document were humans, and have equivalent flaws similar to present-day…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The three good constitutions, monarchy, aristocracy, and democracy, can simply transition to their bad counterparts, tyranny, oligarchy, and anarchy. Machiavelli deviates away from Aristotle and Plato in proposing democracy as a good constitution. He believes that the good constitutions cannot last independently. Therefore, Machiavelli proposes a mixed constitution: a monarchy, aristocracy, and democracy. This is because in Rome, “the blending of these estates made a perfect commonwealth.”…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Aristotle and Plato’s World View on Democracy In this essay I will explore the views of democracy and the education of the people and reasons why Aristotle had a favorable view on it more than Plato did. In relation, Aristotle and Plato were great thinkers far beyond their time in philosophy. However, they had two very different world views on democracy and oligarchy.…

    • 1354 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays