Thinkery In Socrates's Phenomenon, By Aristophanes

Improved Essays
There is always a quest for getting the proper education, and finding the right place to give you the education that you need. No matter what education plays a key role in everyday life and society. According to Aristophanes, Socrates runs the Thinkery. In the Thinkery, the students are taught to make an argument that will be believed rather than an argument that is morally correct. Aristophanes presents the Thinkery as bad because his intentions show what a school shouldn’t be because of the Arguments that are being formed, what form of education is considered right to teach, and being dishonest. Strepasides needed to receive money back to pay back debt, so he decided to send his son to the Thinkery. Strepasides made it his mission to …show more content…
The Better Argument teaches you to be obedient, respectful, and forceful. Better Argument states, “ Isn’t that precisely how my generation’s education bred the men of Marathon? You, by contrast teach our boys to swaddle up in cloaks from birth, such a turn-off when they’re dancing at Athena’s festival, one of them with his shield held low afraid he’ll get his hambone poked! Thus my boy, behold and opt for me, the Better Argument” (Aristophanes, 70). Better Argument and Worse argument have different practices that they believe make the Thinkery system. Even though the Better argument made that statement, Socrates established the idea about what was being taught is different from the practices from the real world, which included dishonest practices. In the text it states, “ You’ve made the younger generation uninterested in education. Just wait until the Athenians find out what fools you’ve made of them” (Aristophanes, 66). With all the opinions that arise within the Thinkery system conflicts and debates can arise over what system is the best. The chorus leader then stated, “Stop your fighting and abuse! You expound just how you used to educate the men of old; you, the modern teacher’s goal. After judging the pros and cons, the boy will choose the school he wants.” (Aristophanes, 67). With such a young population at hand, the Thinkery wants to …show more content…
Better Argument format of teaching allowed the students to have more structure, knowledge, and life skills. Better Argument states, thus my boy, behold, and opt for me, the better argument. You shall learn to loathe the market to feel ashamed of what shameful to burn with rage at nay slight to offer your seat to any grown up you may see approaching you; never treat your parents rudely, never act disgracefully or any way that might dishonor the sacred shine of Modesty” (Aristophanes, 70). It also demonstrates a unique way of learning and provides ways that would be beneficial for the civilization. Without having both forms of arguments layout and given to the Thinkery system, there would be no room for growth or argumentation, the argument versus the actual belief. Better Argument made a mission to change education and make an improvement. Good Argument states, “Thus my boy, be bold and opt for me, the Better Argument. You shall learn to loathe the market, to shun the public baths as well, to feel ashamed of what is shameful, to burn with rage at any slight, to offer your seat to any grown up you may see approaching you; (Aristophanes, 70). Exposing the students to this type of education and Better Argument, and Aristophanes believes that it is for the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    According to Hacker and Sommers’ in “Constructing Reasonable Arguments”, taking a stand on a controversial topic, swaying the reader with evidence and analysis, and citing all sources used within an essay are the stepping-stones to produce a well manufactured argumentative essay. The main goal is to persuade the reader to choose the writer's side of the argument over the opposing side in an informative way. Arguments happen everywhere all the time, which means there is more than one way to look at an issue. It's recommended to research the debatable topic and look at it from multiple angles. An efficient way to present a position is to treat is like a court case and provide the reader with as much evidence to sway them while addressing any…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The study of rhetoric today is dying. Thank You for Arguing wants to change that. By introducing rhetoric as a useful everyday tool Thank You for Arguing hopes to revive the mass knowledge and use of rhetoric in everyday conversations. Thank You for Arguing is an excellent book and by giving excellent examples combined with emotion and tools to use logic in an argument it excels in introducing such a vague concept as rhetoric and should have continued use in schools. Thank You for Arguing, written by Jay Heinrichs in February of 2007, brings rhetoric into another light that appeals to the common person that continues to hold a place on Harvard’s top 10 reading list because of its value.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Case For Rhetoric Debate and argument are a pinnacle foundation of speech in the world. Jay Heinrichs Thank You For Arguing: What Aristotle, Lincoln, and Homer Simpson Can Teach Us About the Art of Persuasion, is like the bible of rhetoric and argument. Heinrichs is a former editor of many different publishers including: Rodale Inc., and Dartmouth Alumni Magazine. His book, is the leading book in the introduction to rhetoric, and is used in thousands of classrooms every year.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates’ claim that “things such as size or warmth or whiteness belong neither to the object we measure ourselves against of touch or to we who are doing the measuring or touching” (154b) is a result of taking Heraclitean and Protagorean ideas to their logical extremes. Moreover, in this conclusion, Socrates combined the Heraclitean theory of flux with Theaetetus’ claim that “Knowledge is Perception” (151e), and the Protagorean Man-Is-The-Measure doctrine. These three theses are combined together to properly capture Socrates’ understanding of perception and to make Theaetetus’ view of knowledge as perception plausible. Socrates alters Theaetetus’ initial suggestion because the claim that knowledge is just perception is a self-defeating statement.…

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Love is everywhere. From era to era love has remained a constant and influential force. For decades philosophers all over the world have pondered what love is, force or being, and how it affects people. Among these were Plato and his associates. Throughout Platos Symposium each of his companions gave a speech either glorifying or defining love, each building or destroying what the previous speaker portrayed.…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    According to Aristotle, for an argument to be effective it needs to be persuasive. In order for persuasion to occur, it must appeal to one’s reasoning, emotions, and authority. These terms are referred to as logos for reasoning, pathos for emotion, and ethos for authority. With that being said, when comparing the two essays, “On Real Education” by Robert T. Perry, and “Is College for Everyone?” by Pharinet, Robert T. Perry did a better job at persuading his audience by using the modes of rhetoric.…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Socrates Quote Analysis

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This is one of my favorite quotes from Socrates and I believe that it’s really meaningful. I find this quote very interesting since, there are many ways to find a meaning for it or a way to feel identified with it. The meaning of with quote for me is, when humans do something that they have not done before and they enjoyed or really like it, and they know that they will repeat it again. Human are that way. When you find pleasure doing something you want to do it again, to feel the emotions you felt.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Argumentative Strategies of Plato vs. Aristophanes In Aristophanes’ “Clouds” and Plato’s “Apology” Socrates is satirically attacked and rationally defended respectively. The two argumentative styles of Aristophanes and Plato are on opposite sides of the spectrum. Aristophanes utilizes satire and humorous exaggerations of sophist teachings to denounce Socrates. Alternatively, Plato’s “Apology” uses logic and reason in order to defend himself against the charges brought against him.…

    • 2212 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The character that I decided to stand by during this dialog is Socrates. It seems like he was the most logical and provided the most facts out of all of the characters. Socrates is for the people before he his for himself. Even though I connected most with Socrates I do stand by Callicles in some of his points. Socrates is basically the goody tushu of all the characters.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It can be argued, that in our years of learning, our education system only provides us with some of what is necessary to achieve a “thorough and efficient education”. In an article by Theodore Sizer taken from What High School Is, the opening chapter of a book called Horace’s Compromise; The Dilemma…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As Heinrichs states, “Rhetoric faded in academia during the 1800’s, when social scientists dismissed the notion that an individual could stand up to the inexorable forces of history” (5) in other words, rhetoric faded out as people didn’t quite believe they could make a change or believe they could lead a cause. The purpose of this book is to firstly help people see that argument surrounds their everyday lives and that it's virtually inescapable. Secondly it helps the reader in mastering the art of persuasion to dominate the playing field and the everyday aspects of their life from their work to their relationships (family, friends, or shall we say their significant other). Thirdly it also introduces the faults that many make during any argument that present themselves such as bad decorum or lack of ethos, pathos, and logos. The strategy employed most by Heinrichs is Aristotle’s three tools which are ethos ( argument by character), logos (argument by logic), and pathos (argument by emotion)…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Comedies often provide laughter and entertainment while presenting social, political, philosophical, and theological ideas and problems. Within the comedy genre, satire presents itself in a form of sarcasm, irony and humor. It is the combination of entertainment and critique to criticize the ignorance of a person or society. It has a few elements: entertainment and critical reflection to awaken the audience and to address issues and questions. It does not seek to do harm, but it seeks the truth and its purpose is to create a reform (a change or improvement).…

    • 1786 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Regardless of which side you’re on , every argument has three basic steps one should follow to be successful. The first step is to stimulate emotion , the second is to change the opinion of the crowd , and the third…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The corruption of youth is a crime with dire consequences. It is essential to help cultivate young peoples’ minds and refuse to give up until they have completely immersed their mindset in a logical way of thinking and rational point of view. However, this is not an easy job and it often comes with protests from people who don’t agree with a specific method of teaching. Socrates was a victim of such opposition in 399 B.C Athens. Meletus claimed that Socrates corrupted the youth through his teachings.…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The purpose of this paper is to determine whether philosophies such as Idealism, Realism, and Pragmatism should reason with children. However, before we begin to analyze this statement, I think it is important to define what is reason and provide a brief overview of Piaget’s cognitive theory. Reasoning is a systematic process that enable individuals to achieve knowledge and understanding (Landauer & Rowlands, 2001). This process includes stages such as logic, deduction, and induction (Cohen, 1999).…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics