For me, I find that the Muslim source was more convincing and straight to the point and there was not any biases inherited in the source. But concerning the Christian source I see that a lot of biases were inherited in the source and it was obvious enough in its description and way of …show more content…
Works Cited
1. Al-Athir, I. "The Franks Conquer Jerusalem". Academic Search Premier. Web. 28 March 2016.
2. Krey, A. "The First Crusade: The Accounts of Eyewitnesses and Participants" (1921): 250-56. Academic Search Premier. Web. 28 March 2016.
3. Krey, A. "The First Crusade: The Accounts of Eyewitnesses and Participants" (1921): 256-57. Academic Search Premier. Web. 28 March 2016.
4. Krey, A. "The First Crusade: The Accounts of Eyewitnesses and Participants" (1921): 257-62. Academic Search Premier. Web. 28 March 2016.
5. Duncan, F. and Krey, A. "The Deeds of the Franks Who Attacked Jerusalem" (1912):109-115. Academic Search Premier. Web. 28 March