Comparing A. J. Ayer's Freedom And Necessity '

Decent Essays
Nickolas Geeker
Summary of A.J. Ayer’s Freedom and Necessity In Ayer’s essay Freedom and Necessity, he discusses his argument for the idea of Determinism, which states that humans act the way they do because of the way existing factors in their lives make them do so, and that it is not a product of their freewill. He also discusses that these already existing factors are known as casual laws, which are past experiences, feelings, and other factors that make people formulate whom they are. Ayer also states that he believes that the theory of Determinism and the idea of freewill can coexist. But he explains that even though people are drawn to act a certain way by these laws, they are not constrained to their choices and ultimately

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    In the following, I will argue that people act upon their own free will and not through determinism, and disprove the third and fourth components of Strawson’s initial Basic Argument. Determinism is defined as the theory that everything that happens is determined to happen exactly as it does by what has happened before. Essentially, this means that every choice that a person makes they have not actually made- their choice was determined for them long ago and they are acting how they believe they chose to act. This is similar to the Christian belief of predestination, which is defined as the foreordaining of all that will happen in the future. The principal difference between determinism and predestination is that the concept of predestination…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Determinism is defined as all events occur according to the human due to external causes and in which the human has no control. Determinism is carefully evaluated due to the results of Cesare Lombroso’s assumption. It is not an accurate prediction that an offender will commit to a crime due to their external causations. Robert Agnew demonstrates in his studies that determinism isn’t a reliable theory due to the free will of the offender. He mentions other factors that can determine the offender to commit a crime by a psychological, biological, and social reason.…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Gateway to Freedom, the Hidden History of the Underground Railroad by author Eric Foner, several issues are addressed including, the dangers of trying to escape, and the problems that were faced after finally escaping and leaving family behind. Throughout Gateway to Freedom, Foner’s main focus is on how the Underground Railroad worked, as well as how they thought they didn’t have to be as active as they had been in the past because a war was coming. The rise of the Abolitionist movement started during the 1850s with Frederick Douglass’ escape. While trying to escape Douglass come across David Ruggles, who was the only agent of the Underground Railroad he had come across during his escape (Foner, 2015, 6).…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Charles Arthur Campbell was a philosopher who defended the Libertarian view of free will. While he was a believer in free will, he also left room for determinism because he believed that determinism does not go against the correct view of free will. He believed that in order for an act to be free, the agent must be the sole author of the act. If one is subjected to the influence of past events or a set of events one’s action is not free because if other entities other than the agent had influence upon the given act then that act can no longer be deemed morally correlated to the agent. One must also have a real sense that one could have done otherwise in order to be compatible with the view that one event does not lead to another.…

    • 166 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay, the free will problem, pertaining to philosophical nature, will be introduced and explained so that the reader can grasp the foundation of this essay’s main focus. The main focus of this essay is A.J. Ayer and his argument for compatibilism. The argument for compatibilism, according to Ayer, is that a choice that one makes cannot be free unless it is caused. Ayer also suggests that a person can only be held morally responsible for their actions if they had the ability to choose otherwise. This may sound confusing right now, but it will make sense soon.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Psychologically speaking, as humans, we are wired to think that we have the freedom to act and do based upon our own self judgment. For simplistic reasons, let’s assume that this “freedom” is analogous to free will which is a philosophical idea in which to act freely is to have multiple open futures and possibilities, or to be able to choose between many different choices. Determinism is the belief that every event (including action, choices, and decisions) is the inevitable result of a causal chain of events. In other words, a choice with an action (A) is the inevitable result of an earlier action of an earlier choice. This principle presents a problem for the concept of free will.…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The debate of Free Will v Determinism is one that has gone on for centuries, and shall continue to go on for many to come. There are many who believe that their view is the end all, be all, correct view to hold. While not all of these thinkers are correct in their standings, Paul Holbach’s essay, “The Illusion of Free Will,” lays out a strong argument for universal determinism; man does not have any free will, and all of his actions are determined by the laws of nature. His argument is one that is accurate and strong, leaving little to criticize, despite what many believe to be proof that he is incorrect: the presence of choice and the absence of restraint. He takes these two beliefs and shows exactly why they do not denote free will, and all…

    • 2442 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The 3rd Reflective Essay Amr Eid Radwan Are we free? - Exploration of Will by Exploiting D’Holbach’s Arguments - P eople always want to believe that they are free. But is this the truth? Are we the ones who determine their fates? Are there any external factors that cause our actions?…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Eric Foner’s Gateway to Freedom: The Hidden History of the Underground Railroad, Foner discusses the rise, fall, and exploits of the abolitionist movement in the United States. Foner, a famous and renowned historian, is currently the DeWitt Clinton Professor of History at Columbia University. Foner wrote this book to explore and dissect newly found information that reveals the hidden history of the abolitionist movement in America Early on, the abolitionist movement in New York City was not very popular. New York City’s economy still greatly depended on the work of slaves in the South, proven by, “New York City’s prosperity…depended on its relations with the slave South” (Foner 44).…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A. J. Ayer’s analysis of free will is as follows (611): P1 If you would have chosen to act in a way other than you did, you would have P2 You acted voluntarily P3 You were not compelled to act in a certain way C1 Your action was the result of free will Ayer’s first premise for an act of free will states that if you would have decided to make a different choice, you would have made a different choice. This condition for free will addresses the determinism theory (everything that happens can be predicted if you know every nuance of the laws that govern the universe). Ayer believes in both free will and determinism, and this part of his definition of free will eliminates the apparent conflict between the two theories. Just because all of your…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cahn's Argument Analysis

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The idea of moral responsibility is argued between determinists and libertarians, with the division being caused by the possibility of free will. Steven Cahn offers an explanation of the different views of free will with the three opinions being hard determinism, soft determinism, and libertarianism. In this writing, I am going to explain Cahn’s viewpoint, and his idea that freedom is not compatible with determinism. The setting for this argument begins with a criminal trial from the early twentieth century.…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The “apparent fact” according to Sider is that free will and determinism are incompatible. And they are incompatible because of the following arguments: 1. If determinism is true, then everything happens is caused by something happened previously. 2. If everything happens is caused by something happened previously, then we could not have acted freely.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This means that we as humans have freedom to respond to our circumstances and that reaction may be different then another person who faced the exact same circumstances. With free will each person has control over their own actions and their actions are voluntary. Determinism means that behavior is caused by heredity…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We, human beings, in the universe, all feel as though we are making decisions and using our free will each day. We are not forced to do things, we will them to be done. The higher power of God derives in us free will. Determinism is ultimately…

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Free Will and Determinism have been discussed by philosophers for many years. Free will is associated with moral responsibility, and alternative actions that “could have” been taken over the one chosen. Determinism is the opposite view, and is associated with universal causation, and a lack of free will. Determinists believe that a person’s actions are inevitable, they are dictated by a person’s experiences, they believe nurture, nature, and even a person’s genes determine their future actions. Because of this determinists believe people hold no moral responsibility for their actions.…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays