THE PARENT ENTITY
Maybe there’s a more intelligent explanation, an explanation beyond religion and atheist theory. Theists believe that life was created by a supernatural God. Atheists believe life evolved from a combination of inorganic elements mixing together. The problem is that both theories ignore the laws of nature. These models are not believable because they are not observed in nature. No one has combined nonliving materials or breathed air into dirt to miraculously bring life into existence.
We need a theory that follows natural law, a theory that makes sense, a theory that references events observable in nature. To develop a theory that complements nature we need to study nature and then extrapolate.
The answer to how life comes into existence is not a secret and it is not a mystery. We observe life every day. Life is everywhere on this planet. …show more content…
You’re looking for an explanation that makes sense. For the moment let’s assume that there are things happening out there in the universe that we do not know nor understand. Let’s look further into this and see if we can come up with an explanation to our existence that’s acceptable.
When a flash of lightning comes from the sky you can say, “That lightning bolt evolved from warm air with positive droplets and cold air with negative crystals bumping into each other triggering a massive electrostatic discharge”, or you can simply say, “That cloud created lightning”. Evolve or created, it makes no difference as long as it’s explained as a natural process. Evolution and creation are synergetic. We were created to evolve.
We were created by something that is unknowable and inconceivable. This something has never been written about in any books or texts. We do not know what this something is and we have no concept of what created us. We do know we evolve and we know our creation is a natural
Maybe there’s a more intelligent explanation, an explanation beyond religion and atheist theory. Theists believe that life was created by a supernatural God. Atheists believe life evolved from a combination of inorganic elements mixing together. The problem is that both theories ignore the laws of nature. These models are not believable because they are not observed in nature. No one has combined nonliving materials or breathed air into dirt to miraculously bring life into existence.
We need a theory that follows natural law, a theory that makes sense, a theory that references events observable in nature. To develop a theory that complements nature we need to study nature and then extrapolate.
The answer to how life comes into existence is not a secret and it is not a mystery. We observe life every day. Life is everywhere on this planet. …show more content…
You’re looking for an explanation that makes sense. For the moment let’s assume that there are things happening out there in the universe that we do not know nor understand. Let’s look further into this and see if we can come up with an explanation to our existence that’s acceptable.
When a flash of lightning comes from the sky you can say, “That lightning bolt evolved from warm air with positive droplets and cold air with negative crystals bumping into each other triggering a massive electrostatic discharge”, or you can simply say, “That cloud created lightning”. Evolve or created, it makes no difference as long as it’s explained as a natural process. Evolution and creation are synergetic. We were created to evolve.
We were created by something that is unknowable and inconceivable. This something has never been written about in any books or texts. We do not know what this something is and we have no concept of what created us. We do know we evolve and we know our creation is a natural