The Dead Henrik Ibsen Analysis

Great Essays
This essay will compare two pieces of literature, “The Dead” written by James Joyce and “A Doll’s House” written by Henrik Ibsen. Both of which contain story elements that seem to be common in all types of literature. There are many different story elements but in both stories, there are a few that stand out to me, but one of which I feel spoke strongly to me was the secrets of the women in both “The Dead” and “A Doll’s House”. What I mean by this is in both stories the women held until the end of the stories almost something that their husband did not know of; but someone else did rather than the person they should be closest to. In a dolls house, Nora’s secret was a dangerous one. She had borrowed money from the bank through Krogstad and forged her …show more content…
Helmer tells Nora that Krogstad is a bad man and he “wriggled out of it with lies and trickery” – (Ibsen pg. 1573). He then goes on to say that Krogstad is the worst type of person, the type who wears a mask in front of the people closest to them. Saying this, however, Helmer says he’s not quick to condemn a man but seems harsh in saying “Krogstad wears a mask in front of his own wife and children” similar to the way Nora is now, being she owes Krogstad the money back and her family does not know. Krogstad eventually leaves a letter in their mailbox after losing his job to Mrs. Kristine Linde. This letter tells Torvald everything that has happened with the forging of the signature. The secret is unfolded and Helmer Immediately says that his wife Nora is forbidden from raising her own kids. Nora is shocked and decides to leave considering in the end she only borrowed the money to try to help her husband even know she felt like she was a “doll,” little and delicate and easy to break not only once by her father but by her own

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In A Doll 's House, Nora is introduced as a childish wife who loves money and is looked down upon by her husband, Torvald. “But Nora, Nora is not so silly as you think. We have not been in a position for me to waste money. We have both had to work.”(12). Through her statement, Nora reveals that she knows what she is doing which proves that everything she does in front of Torvald is all an act.…

    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    She does this by telling Torvald “I give you back your ring. Give me mine” (Ibsen…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, Nora is still caged within her house and craves a sense of responsibility like a proper adult. Through deceit, Nora is able to achieve this by borrowing money to save Torvald’s life while still keeping her perfect dependent doll like image. If Torvald knew the truth, this breaking of the traditional roles would ruin “[their] beautiful happy…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Jorge Luis Borges, a 20th century author, declared, "I have always imagined that paradise will be a kind of library. " Reading is a beautiful paradise that can take a person to a whole new world in a whole new time period. It promotes imagination and stimulates the mind. Over the summer, the sophomores of Oakland Catholic’s Honors World Literature Class received the pleasure of reading three stories: A Doll’s House by Henrik Ibsen, Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, and Oedipus the King by Sophocles. Henrik Ibsen’s play A Doll’s House was by far the most entertaining and interesting of the summer reading books, while the storyline of Sophocles’s tragic play Oedipus the King did not contain enough relatable content to be as engaging.…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In addition, after receiving an influential position in the bank, Torvald sacrifices the time he could spend with his family during the holidays; he wants to make sure that the situation at the bank is handled before he officially starts his job. Similarly, by attempting to support his wife at her deathbed, Krogstad risks his integrity and image amongst others by committing fraud in order to earn money. These actions lead to Krogstad being discharge from his job in the bank as his mistakes cause Torvald, his employer, to mistrust him and believe in the possibility of defaming future actions. In love with Nora Helmer, Dr. Rank gambles his close friendship with Helmer by sneaking into Nora’s room to converse and to share sexually intriguing moments with Torvald’s wife. His actions also prove that people tend to sacrifice their dignity more willingly at a time close to their death.…

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He says to her, “[w]e won’t have any melodrama” (Ibsen 220), “[l]ocking the front door” (Ibsen 220). Marriage at the time was a patriarchal arrangement, and Helmer typically projects his dominance onto Nora by restricting her freedom in what she can eat and say, demeans her by calling her patronizing names, and more. Nora is entrapped in the marriage. By physically imprisoning her by locking the door in a moment of anger, Helmer shows his true nature. The action is a physical manifestation of the true underlying imprisonment in their marriage.…

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    A Difference in Storytelling In John Steinbeck’s, The Chrysanthemums and Henrik Ibsen’s, A Doll’s House, they share a common theme about women being repressed by society. Though they both share this common theme, each writer chooses to reveal the theme throughout the story in different, unique ways. Steinbeck chooses to use symbolism and setting to portray the theme, whereas Ibsen uses dialog as the main method to portray the theme.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Doll’s House Literary Analysis The play Doll’s House is not childish as it sounds; it reflects the reality of what oppression against women looked like in past. Nora, the play’s protagonist, struggles with situation where she unknowingly broke the law in order to aid her husband in ill by asking for money from other man; she tries to escape from her guilt by ensuring that Krogstad keeps his position in her husband’s bank, then tried to keep husband from reading the letter of their transaction, and ultimately she considered of suicide. However, the ending of play was surprisingly different than expected, and Nora had finally escaped from her “guilt” and lived a life where some people don’t know.…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the middle of the play Nora has her first plan as to how she will leave her family. Krogstad is the source of Nora's secret loan that she is trying to repay. When his position at the bank that Nora's husband manages is in jeopardy, he asks Nora to use her position as Helmer's wife to keep his job safe. When she refuses to do so Krogstad begins to blackmail her. He reminds her that he has a contract that she forged her father's signature, and uses that as blackmail bait.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    By hiding behind the façade he creates for himself and Nora, he’s ignoring his social responsibilities. He figures that as long as everything looks good from the outside, no one will have to deal with what’s on the inside. This way of thinking, however, leads to a build up of problems that eventually can’t be dismissed any longer. In one scene, Torvald asks Nora what she’s doing, to which she replies with “Taking off my fancy dress,” (64). This symbolizes Nora removing the façade that Torvald has created therefore exposing the issues that for so long were ignored.…

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Helmer is the authority and provider of the home. Helmer often scolds Nora, epitomizing an imbalance in their marriage. Helmer’s stage directions portray him wagging his finger at her, like an adult would to a child (Ibsen, 4). Helmer is also illustrated giving Nora money (Ibsen, 3). This stage direction embodies Nora’s lack of adult responsibility and her reliance on Helmer.…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    HOW DOES THE HIERARCHY OF SOCIETY AFFECT THE SENSE OF DUTY AND MORALITY OF CERTAIN CHARACTERS IN GHOSTS? Ghosts was a play written by Henrik Ibsen, an 19th century Norwegian playwright who was credited for the creation for modern realistic drama. Ibsen specialized in portraying the stark reality of life in the 19th century.…

    • 1639 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nora borrowed money from Krogstad to be able to finance a trip to Italy in order to save her husbands life. Nora does not want Torvald to find out about her secret loan because she does not feel that Torvald is capable of hearing the truth and she is aware of his dislike towards loans. " There's something constrained, something ugly even, about a home…

    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Henrik Ibsen ’s play “Ghosts” was published in 1881 and was first performed in 1882 in Chicago through the production of Danish Touring Company. It is a story that highlights social conflicts such as failed marriage, infidelity and incestuous love to depict a filthy image of the author’s contemporary society. Characters in this play seek for freedom and truth. One of the main characters in the story, Mrs. Alving said, “Well, I can’t help it; I must have done with all this constraint and insincerity.…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Social Conventions: The Condemnation of Norwegians Within his play, Ghosts, Henrik Ibsen places great emphasis on the issue of social conventions that prioritize duties and obligations in the Norwegian society of 1880. During his era, 90 percent of all Norwegians belonged to the Evangelical Lutheran National Church, the Church of Norway, which yielded great influence and authority within the society (Lovoll). Throughout Ghosts, the issues faced by the Alvings are rooted in the predefined beliefs and traditions within society that have been upheld by the Church. The hypocrisy of the Church is manifested within Pastor Manders, who wrongfully oppresses the Alvings with what is deemed acceptable in accordance with the Church.…

    • 1616 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays