Compare Machiavelli And Thomas Hobbes

Superior Essays
Niccolo Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes are important political philosophers of their time. The philosophers share similar negative views on the human nature. These negative views of human nature are reflected in their views of government, politics, and the treatment of citizens. Niccolo Machiavelli was from the 1400 era. He was considered the Father of Political Science. He was born in the city-state of Florence. Machiavelli got is some trouble with the rulers of Florence, The Medici, and was barred from entering the city. As a result of this, he wrote “The Prince” to try to get back into Florence. The Prince presents Machiavelli’s a view of a governing state that in which one Prince is the sole authority. The Prince would determine every aspect …show more content…
He was an atheist and supporter of science. His views of nature are similar with those of Machiavelli. He believed that there was a Law of Self-Interest, in which people were evil and acted in their perceived self-interest. In the State of Nature, people would deny things from their own family in their self-interest. Without states, laws, and orders, life is solitary, poor, nasty, and brutish. He did not believe that people could do good deeds for no rewards, although he believed people had it in them to try to be good. I think that this is a harsh view. Hobbes reasoned that human behavior functioned according to laws. He believed in a social compact, where people would voluntarily create the government to rule them. He presented the solution of a sovereign government that makes, enforces, the laws of his social compact, in which citizens give certain rights in exchange for preservation. The sovereign himself, however, is above the law. This is similar to Machiavelli’s view on The Prince. The Sovereign is the personification of the state. Hobbes believes that the sovereign can’t be too strict or too lenient, but has the power to ban and censor anything, distribute property as they see fit, and declare wars in they want to. Hobbes believes that fear is the best way to rule, that people must be controlled through the sword. This differs from Machiavelli’s beliefs on ruling. Machiavelli believed The Prince should not be just feared, but also loved. However, Machiavelli admits that fear works best for law and order, which is the case here. Hobbes says that a truly free person is one who goes along with the sovereign. However, Hobbes believed that all subjects of a government had the right to overthrow a government that no longer supported them. Hobbes wrote his “Laws of Nature”, which were his recommendations for guidelines for society. The “laws” are as follows; always seek peaceful solutions, lay down

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the 15th and 16th centuries AD, philosophers emerged in Europe who were more secular than their medieval counterparts. Three of these philosophers were Niccolò Machiavelli, Thomas Hobbes, and Pico della Mirandola, each of whom had unique ideas about human nature, and the source of people’s joy and sorrow. Machiavelli and Hobbes were both critical of human nature, each proposing their own solution to the flaws they saw in their society, while Mirandola praised humanity’s potential. Niccolò Machiavelli was a political philosopher who lived in Florence, Italy during the Rennaisance. While in exile, and hoping for political employment, he wrote The Prince, in which he claimed that humans, inherently corrupt, must be ruled by a prince who prioritizes effective government over morality and ethics.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Anarchism: What It Really Stands For, Emma Goldman states: “Every fool, from king to policeman, from the flatheaded parson to the visionless dabbler in science, presumes to speak authoritatively of human nature”. Thomas Hobbes and John Locke, two of the most influential modern philosophers, presumed to speak authoritatively on human nature. They presumed so much so, that each of the philosophers dedicated the bulk of a novel to discussing their interpretation of human nature. In fact, Goldman herself speaks quite extensively on her interpretation of human nature. Hobbes, Locke, and Goldman fit together nicely on the philosophy of human nature spectrum.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Hobbes view, if the sovereign can easily be overthrown, then you don’t really have a sovereign. They are, in a sense, immune (something close to a dictator). For Hobbes, where there is no rule there is no justice. Without a legal system in place, there is no conception of justice. The only way to make sure our selfishness doesn’t get out of control is an absolute…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes places the sovereign at the apex of all other aspects of life. There must be absolute ruthlessness in capturing, sustaining and enhancing political power by the ruler for Machiavelli. Niccolo Machiavelli’s perspective on government is the superlative choice due…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In many political philosopher’s eyes, there is a special relationship between the ideas of moral goodness and legitimate authority. Some of these political philosophers believed that the use of political power was only morally correct if it was exercised under a ruler who had virtuous morals. These rulers who had virtuous morals were then told that in order to be successful, they needed to make decisions in accordance with the standards of ethical goodness. This moralistic view of authority is what Machiavelli criticizes in his work “The Prince.” In Machiavelli’s book, “The Prince,” the readers are introduced to political values that do not necessarily give full recognition to morality or religion.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Thomas Hobbes established his own ideas about people and politics. For example, Hobbes believed that humans were selfish and did anything to better their position. Also, he believed that nations were selfishly motivated and only battled for power and wealth…

    • 178 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout Chapter 1 of Keeping the Republic, Barbour and Wright discuss the ideologies of three influential members of Politics: James Madison, John Locke, and Thomas Hobbes. Beginning with Madison, he believed strongly in having a republic. As the text describes it, a republic differs from a traditional sense of a democracy, as representation is required. (p.16-17). Madison believed that in a “True Democracy”, everyone would only be acting with their own self-interest in mind.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Similar to Machiavelli, Hobbes also believes that fear is key to maintain power and political authority…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Niccolò Machiavelli spent a large majority of his aristocratic platform defaming the many intrinsic characteristics of human emotion and experience. He consciously ignored the essential acts of care and compassion while promoting a message of fear and hate. His teachings offered detailed instructions on the succession and maintenance of a fear-abiding society encapsulated by submission. His philosophy stated that the best interest of the general public was to irrefutably follow the rule of law. To Machiavelli, a human life could be explained as an expendable resource, awaiting its designated task to serve the ruling class.…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    No morality exists. Everyone lives in constant fear. Because of this fear, no one is really free. However, in the state of nature everyone has the right to everything because there is no limit to natural rights. His theory that common security should be favored and that a bit of individual liberty should be sacrificed by each person to achieve it is an inaccurate policy. Hobbes believes the contract is a mutual transferring of rights.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Thomas Hobbes Influence

    • 1876 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Thomas Hobbes Research Project The Renaissance was the beginning of a new way of thinking, which led to a better path for humanity in the future. It was the bridge that linked the middle age to the modern world. Starting with the change of culture in Italy reform of humanity spread all over Europe based off of the rediscovery of the Greek culture. Italian towns like Venice, Genoa, Bologna, Milan and Rome were made famous by the renaissance.…

    • 1876 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Machiavelli’s principles regarding human nature and morality drew many similarities with that of Hobbes’s. Machiavelli argued that humans are driven by emotions such as fear, hatred and greed and that in a society which was sinful, the only way to protect and obtain power, was through a sovereign who followed the correct moral code, which meant that in some instances sinful actions which disregarded the relevance of morality were acceptable. Hobbes referred to history in order to explain his analysis on political power, he discussed what was called ‘the state of nature’ and that in this scenario, life would be nasty, brutish and short, in which there would be an abundance of freedom, but a lack of security. In this anarchical situation, it would hinder eudemonia as everyone would do as they please. In order to have power and for a state to flourish, Hobbes believed the best methodology would be to conform to the social contract, because without it they would be living in a society of ‘bellum omnium contra omnes’ (Oxford Reference, 2008) which translated to a war of all against all, much like the English Civil War which Hobbes was writing after.…

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes Views On Rebellion

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages

    He believed that society in order to be successful had to be ruled by a strict system of government such as absolute monarchy. In Hobbes’s dissertation “The Leviathan”(1651) a book where he expresses his views he explains that a law of nature was "a precept, or general rule, found out by reason, by which a man is forbidden to do that which is destructive of his life” (Hobbes, 1651, ch14/XIV, p. 64). The law of nature was a broad principle which was discovered through experience and expected to be to be followed in everyday life. These laws encouraged self preservation and disapproved any doings damaging or negative to human life such a rebellions which could result in civil…

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both writers agree on the egoistic nature of mankind that leads to the threat of foreign invasion. For Machiavelli, external conflict arises from a proletariat which desires excess and invades neighboring cities. For Hobbes, all conflict comes from mutual desire for the same object, a constant phenomenon across all people. Because these conflicts, regardless of the source, hinder one’s ability for success or potentially survival, mankind’s desire for security in either schema will propel the surrender of some absolute freedom in order to form a larger community, safe from foreign invaders. Despite the similarity between Machiavelli and Hobbes’ respective models of human nature and their reasons for state formation, the subtle difference in mankind’s fundamental goals leads to striking differences in their views of conflict and therefore different frameworks of governance to ensure internal stability and external…

    • 1255 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Hobbes cared about maximizing liberty, defining social justice, and knowing how to divide the limits of the government power. The process of the state of nature is formed by a community and a government. People would view him as a “Psychological egoist” he was over the top with an unrealistic view of human nature. In the laws of nature and the social contract, “Hobbes thinks the state of nature is something we ought to avoid, at any cost except our own self presentation” (Thomas Hobbes). Hobbes believed in a social contract and how it would help the government rule the society.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays

Related Topics