To start off with comparing and contracting the two choices I will start off with how to become one. On both choices a formal education is not required but it is suggested that for a sport you start it in school to start to gain the skills for it or just pratice on your own, and for acting it´s suggested that if you are in school you join a skill to also help your skills. …show more content…
There is no extact age you can start, meaning you can get a role or go to a acting school early in your life giving you more time to get better at it, while as a athlete you can still join a sport you will not be getting pay and there is really no chance to end up to getting in the big leagues due to your age. Also, another reason I think a actor is a better choice because you don’t really need to be in shape, giving more oppurtinitys, even though being in shape is good, you won’t have to get really in shape to get a job. The third reason is the chance of getting a injury in sports, you could get a injury while acting if you are a stunt double in a action scene or something but the chance of getting hurt while acting is lower then getting hurt in a sport. Those are the reasons why I chose actor as a better job, even though both choices are good choices, I consider acting to be a better choice out of the two, those were most of the ways they compare and contract and that is the result I have