Epicurean Vs Stoic Way Of Life

Improved Essays
Ryan Beale
Professor Jennifer Strickland
PHIL 1301
4 October 2017
Logic or Magic: What do you Believe? Throughout history, there have been many philosophical ways of life that were meant to enlighten their followers. From the Sophists, to Socrates, to Plato and his teachings, and to Aristotle’s teachings, philosophy advanced rapidly around the 6th century BCE. However, I will focus on the Epicurean and Stoic way of life. Although both ways of life have positives and negatives, though thorough research I have come to a realization that the Epicurean way of life is far superior to that of the Stoic way of life and hope to convince you the same way I too was convinced. The Stoic way of life is centered around finding happiness. To find it they,
…show more content…
The main problem I have with the Stoic definition of pleasure that it doesn’t seem that pleasurable to me. The Stoics said to have happiness you must have wisdom and to have wisdom you must have apatheia, the absence of passion. For me personally, I view pleasure as going hand in hand with passion. To have pleasure in something means to be passionate about it or you wouldn’t find it pleasurable. My belief is almost the same as the Epicurean belief of pleasure, “…the absence of bodily pain and the gentle relaxation of the mind” (Boeree 105). Pleasure to me is relaxation of the mind and bodily pain isn’t pleasurable, so the Epicurean way of life is far superior when it comes to their view of what pleasure is. The other reason it is far superior to the Stoic way of life is their theory on creation. Stoics believe that the Universe had no beginning and has no end. They believe that the universe is simply always in flux with no end in sight. The Epicureans believe that the universe is made up of atoms that make up the four elements, earth, wind, water and fire, and once one of the elements becomes dominant is when the world will end. That way of creation is far superior because it is actually creation unlike the stoic belief that everything is just here by magic apparently and nothing dies. Any scholar would agree that Epicureanism is a far superior way of life because it is much more

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Although for completely different reason, they both sought to keep free will and moral responsibility. For the Epicureans, it was the ‘swerve’ that could alter the chain of determinism. Whereas, for the Stoics, Chrysippus attempted to combine determinism and…

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Epictetus taught that philosophy is a way of life and not just a theoretical discipline. To Epictetus, all external events are beyond individual’s control; everyone should accept everything that happens in daily life. However, individuals are responsible for their own actions, which they can examine and control through rigorous self-discipline. Different from Christianity, Stoicism…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Stoic philosophy still rings as true for us today as it did all those centuries ago in ancient Greece. Individuals willing to become mindful of themselves and implement conscious awareness to their attention and actions become free to live harmonious lives with the world around them. Epictetus is an amazing example of the transformative power of one’s thoughts. He demonstrated through example how and individual’s cognitive awareness awards personal power to overcome some of life’s greatest adversities. When the trials and tribulations of life confront us we have the capacity to choose to respond constructively in order to make the best of every situation.…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Stoicism is commonly attributed to individuals who refuse to react to external stimuli, especially those of emotions or circumstances. This application of stoicism has its roots in the Greek philosophy, which taught students to be “indifferent or apathetic to those things which are not in our power” (Connolly, 1995). This concept of Nominalism, a rejection of universality and the abstract, focuses on controlling those things directly in the sphere of influence of an individual (Rodriguez-Pereyra, 2011). Ignoring abstract concepts and paying attention to what a person can actually influence causes individualism to thrive and allows people of any class or background to focus on daily…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One similarity between Buddhism and Stoicism is both focus on the importance of mindfulness. In Buddhism "awareness begins with remembering what we tend to forget" (Batchelor 58). In Stoicism "...reflection... will make us appreciate how wonderful it is that we are alive and have the opportunity to fill this day with activity" (Irvine 71). Once we become mindful of what's presented to us in that moment we have a more positive outlook of life. Because, we took the time to embrace whose and what's in front of us.…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Epictetus Research Paper

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Stephen Taylor Humanities Epictetus. Enchiridion. Dover Publications, 2004 28 September 2014 The philosopher Epictetus was born ca. 50 A.D. in southwest Turkey.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Epicurean philosophy, one can be unafraid of “death” because “death” is not the process of dying not the moment of death, both of which can be both physically and mentally damaging. “Death” instead means the act of being dead. If we believe that death involves no pleasure or pain and that the only thing in life that is bad is pain, then we can reason that death is not bad, since it doesn’t involve pain. Also, the disregard of death doesn’t imply an indifference to life. If finding pleasure is the purpose to one’s life, and one must be alive to experience pleasure,…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He believes that death annihilates identity and identity ends when the body ends. Human are necessarily mortal; even if they’re put back together after death, it would not be the same because the only thing that makes an individual themselves is the unity of the identity and body. When the connection of these two break, there is no putting them back together. Epicurus has the notion that “good and bad consists of sense-experience” (164). Death is the annihilation of those experiences.…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Evolutionary defence of the Epicurean’s argument that pleasure is the highest good My argument is that from the standpoint of evolution, hedonism is the most valid theory of the ‘good life’. The scope will be narrowed down to Quantitative Hedonism (Bentham, 1789), as there is only one kind of pleasure and its worth is measured on dimensions of intensity and duration. This essay will first lay out the importance of this view and its major positions which it stands for. After which, objections against Hedonism (from Aristotle and Cicero), and the Evolutionary perspective will be discussed.…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Four Tendencies Summary

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the reading of The Dichotomy of Control, “The Stoics argue that rather than striving after many things that will only lead to frustration, a better goal is to want only those things that one can be confident that he or she can obtain”…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Epicurus

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages

    While vulgar hedonism sought excess of pleasure like fine wine, sex, and luxury whereas Epicurean hedonism is about having pleasure in the present while planning for the future. For instance, getting drunk will give pleasure tonight but will feel awful tomorrow and also in the long run. However, doing exercise will cause pain now but is a lot better in the long run. That is Epicurean happiness, to live a satisfied…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ethical theories of both Aristotle and Epictetus, laid out in their books the Nicomachean Ethics and the Enchiridion, respectively, offer humanity insight into the most effective ways to achieve happiness and to exhibit virtue. Aristotle’s approach to happiness is that it must be looked at as the end to a means not as a means to an end. He feels that happiness should be viewed as the highest good within life. Although Epictetus agrees that happiness is the highest attainable good, he believes that the source of humanity’s misery is people’s inability to differentiate between what they can control and what they cannot. While both philosopher’s theories emphasize the importance of happiness and virtue in a person’s life, Epictetus’ view…

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the “Letter to Menoeceus”, Epicurus argues that pleasure is the only essential good that people seek. He argues that pleasure is the only thing that people should pursue for its own sake. In this paper, I will make that the argument that pleasure or pain’s absence are not the only things worth pursuing for their own sake. Epicurus—a psychological hedonist—argues that “the end of all our actions is to be free of pain and fear” (Epicurus, par. 6). To summarize his argument, he states that pleasure is the ultimate result of all of our actions.…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Aristotle and Epicurus are two Greek philosophers who had a significant impact on the people of their time based on their philosophical ideas, concepts, and theories. However, many of Aristotle’s views on ethics are still incorporated into modern philosophy. Their philosophies are quite different yet shared many commonalities. Aristotle’s Theory of Virtue in comparison to Epicurus’ Theory of Hedonism is substantially more realistic and more solid. A society would be better thriving off of Aristotle’s theory.…

    • 1777 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I will be comparing and contrasting Aristotle’s and the Stoics’ view of human happiness, and using these theories and views, examining if bodily and external goods are necessary to happiness, and to be able to back up why it either is or is not necessary. The two had many similarities, and differences that can be expanded. The Stoics believed our happiness was based off one thing entirely, and that is virtues. Aristotle breaks down how happiness is the highest possible good.…

    • 2002 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays