THESIS: Tongan and Iroquois political and social organization were different in several ways. Tongan political organization was by chiefdom, and social structure was through rank stratification divided by genealogical relationships of the primarily patrilineal line. The Iroquois’ political system was by tribe, and the societal organization was egalitarian with clans as matrilineal. Both are similar because of the heavy impact of European culture on both societies. European influence changed the gender roles, political structure, and the social hierarchy of each group.…
Imagine a world where there weren’t consequences to the decisions that have been made regarding the “discovery” of the Americas and the unethical treatment made towards the Native Americans. Would the indigenous people have more rights? Would they be more successful as a nation now without the involvement of the white man? Surely the answer would be yes, however it is too late to ask ourselves questions like that. This essay will look at two court cases described in Walter Echo-Hawk’s book, In the Courts of the Conqueror, a book that details ten of the most negatively impactful court cases in Unites States history regarding the treatment of Native Americans and how they are still being impacted to this very day by the rulings of those cases.…
The imperial administration of Han China and Imperial Rome both left behind many achievements and had an Emperor as the political leader. However, the Romans weren’t as independent in their technology, nor did the emperors rule the same way. The Han and Roman Emperors left behind an abounding amount of new accomplishments, but it is obvious that the Hans had more creativity in their culture. The Roman Empire was influenced heavily by Greek Culture.…
The Julio- Claudians were a succession of Roman emperors that proceeded from Julius Caesar followed by his adopted son Octavian or Augustus Caesar. In addition to Augustus, followed Tiberius, Caligula, Claudius, and Nero. These emperors differed in competence, and the names of Tiberius, Caligula, and Nero became synonymous for tyranny, insanity, and abuse of power.…
Which empire held power for the longest amount of time, the Mongols or Islamic caliphates? 2. Which empire had the most power and land? 3. Which rulers do you think were more effective at gaining power, the Mongols or the Islamic caliphs?…
The most influential Classical empires were fewer in number than those of the Ancient Era. The states in nearby areas gradually formed together, whether it be by their own choice or by force, to form these large empires. As a result, the Classical empires were also much greater in size. The populations could easily reach tens of millions, compared to a few hundred thousand in smaller states. The empires also stretched across huge tracts of land while civilizations such as the River Valley civilization were constrained to areas surrounding rivers and riverbanks.…
The achievements of The Roman Empire and the Pax Romana certainly did justify the roles of Caesar and Augustus as dictators. During his reign as dictator from 49-44 BC, Julius Caesar had a number of notable impacts on the city of Rome. One of the initial crises that Caesar had to deal was widespread debt in Rome, especially after the outbreak of civil war. There was a serious shortage of coinage as people hoarded whatever they had. Cesar took matters into his own hands and though the measures he took still didn't eliminate Rome’s debt, his ways helped to relieve the debt in a way that satisfied both lenders and borrowers.…
The Aztecs were ethnic groups of central Mexico who grew to conquer large areas Mesoamerica known as the Aztec Empire. The Incan Empire was a civilization along the coast of South America that conquered neighboring regions through their military strengths. While both the Aztecs and Incas had similar social hierarchies consisting of the elite, government officials, and commoners, the Aztecs had no structured form of government only paying tributes to officials compared to the Incas’ military ran bureaucracy. The Aztec Empire and the Incan Empire shared similar structures of their social class.…
One of the key components of any successful civilization throughout history is political control. It has proven itself absolutely necessary when it comes to maintaining order in any society. Political organization began to become much more elaborate during the Classical period, offering government leaders more control over the population. We see many different approaches to maintaining this control throughout the classical period civilizations. The Classical period Han and Mauryan dynasty sought and achieved political control through both religion and social hierarchy.…
Points of the Fourth Lateran Council During the time of declining organization and importance of the Roman Catholic Church Pope Innocent, the Third called a meeting of the fourth Lateran Council in 1215. There were a huge number of Bishops, Abbots and envoys from several European Kingdoms. The issues addressed at the council were along the lines of making the church more godly and spiritual, and addressing the problem of heresy. Pope Innocent considered heresy a serious problem and he wanted absolute authority over the church.…
Justinian the Conqueror (aka The Emperor Triumphant, Barberini Ivory) is thought to have been created in Constantinople (Byzantine) in the early 6th century. The artist is unknown. It is a diptych panel in five parts. The pieces’ dimensions are: 32.4 cm by 26.8 cm by 2.8 cm deep.…
Second-wave empires continued to use social ladders such as the caste system in India. These social structures however, became much more strict and rigid. Furthermore, the margin of difference between social classes widen significantly. In comparison, second-wave empires imposed a firmer hold on women subordination, whereas river valley civilizations were less restrictive. Both first and second-wave civilizations claimed to have leaders that are spiritual connected to the gods, share a couple of innovations, have a social class system, and practice patriarchy.…
Both the ancient civilizations of Rome and Egypt have different characteristic that make their countries the most powerful of their time. Egypt although in a desert used the Nile River to grow bigger and Rome used the warm Mediterranean weather and the Italian peninsula to grow bigger too. These characteristics can be in how they lived their life or how they flourished in their different landscape. I learned that both Egypt and Rome worked with each other even after the Romans took control of Egypt. Their interactions were both helpful and negative.…
My viewpoint to the roman republic will consist of why the roman republic ended. I will start off by explaining the formation of the roman republic then talk about the rise and the fall of it. The roman republic lasted a long time in which it shows its strengths. A big reason why the roman republic lasted so long was because the success of the great leaders. Overall, the fall of the Roman Empire wasn’t caused by a single event.…
So he had to depend on various officials and ministers. The Mauryan King had to depend on the council of ministers for the success of the Mauryan administration. The Council of Ministers of Mauryan Empire was known as the Mantri Parishad. The number of its ministers in Mauryan administration system were not fixed and varied according to needs.…