The Casey Anthony Trial in 2011 captured national media attention and enraptured the nation with its press coverage. Casey Anthony was accused of murdering her two year old daughter Caylee Anthony. Prosecutors were unable to prove that Casey Anthony had murdered her daughter and she was acquitted of first degree murder and manslaughter. She was found guilty only on four lesser charges and sentenced to four years of jail time. In this case the burden of proof fell to the state.…
Between 1945 and 1948 war crimes trials were taking place in Japan and began hearing the case against 28 Japanese military and government officials accused of committing war crimes and crimes against humanity during World War II. On November 4, 1948, the trial ended with 25 of 28 Japanese defendants being found guilty. Of the three other defendants, two had died during the lengthy trial, and one was declared insane. On November 12, the war crimes tribunal passed death sentences on seven of the men, including General Hideki Tojo, who served as Japanese premier during the war, and other principals, such as Iwane Matsui, who organized the Rape of Nanking, and Heitaro Kimura, who brutalized Allied prisoners of war. Sixteen others were sentenced to life imprisonment, and two were sentenced to lesser terms in prison.…
For example, the execution of Henry Wirz, for his maltreatment of Union Prisoners of War during the American Civil War. However, unlike that trial, the Nuremburg Trials contained a tribunal with judges from America, Russia, and Great Britain. Since each of these countries had their own legal practices, it made the trials much more complicated. After some time, the Allies eventually declared the laws and procedures for the trials on August 8, 1945 using the London Charter of the International Military Tribunal (IMT). The IMT included three categories: war crimes, crimes against peace, and crimes against humanity.…
Later, the occupying Allies also held trials of lower-level Nazi officials who had been captured. Some have criticized the Nuremberg Trials, saying that the International Military Tribunal was not a true court of law, since it did not have the authority of a world government to back it. These critics of the trials view them as a simple act of vengeance-the winners punishing the losers.…
Those who were found guilty faced horrific executions, such as being burned alive, starved to death and the list goes…
The Nuremberg Trials were the first trials in history to seek justice against an entire regime for aggressive war crimes. They took place immediately after World War II ended, the indictment happened on October 18th, 1945. The horrible war crimes included invading other nations, violating the Treaty of Versailles and the most horrific crimes against humanity. The Nuremberg Trials prosecuted twenty one defendants, all of whom were Nazi officers and part of six major Nazi organizations. The trials did not serve justice to the victims or the heartless inhumane crimes against them.…
After World War II the United Nations created tribunals for criminal prosecution of war crimes proceeded with the Nuremberg Trials. Since that time there have been other systems including the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) that dealt with the war crimes that occurred in Yugoslavia. Also, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) which prosecuted those involved in the genocide in Rwanda (U.N., 2015). In addition, there are Hybrid Tribunals and the International Criminal Court (ICC). These tribunals and law courts are successful in prosecuting individuals involved in major crimes.…
Almost twenty years after the Nazis defeat, the Frankfurt Auschwitz trials began. This was the second trial for Nazi soldiers stationed in Auschwitz. Over the course of two years, twenty-two defendants were tried for their actions during the Holocaust. These trials took place in Germany and were open to the public. This was somewhat of a way to bring the details of the Holocaust to the public.…
On December 17, 1942, several countries, including the United States and Great Britain, identified the law as an avenue for pursuing justice on behalf of individuals persecuted in the Holocaust, resolving to prosecute war criminals responsible for the mass murder of civilian populations (United States Holocaust Memorial Museum). From 1945 to 1946, the Allied powers sentenced 22 war criminals for their actions, yet the process of understanding crimes against humanity and empowering their victims extends beyond legal ramifications (United States Holocaust Memorial Museum). Labeling the Holocaust as a stain in human history is an understatement; the massacre of 6 million individuals, each bearing a story, familial lineage, and personal aspirations,…
Nuremburg trials were considered revolutionary because of its impact on human rights. Its sole purpose was to bring Nazi war offenders to justice. It was thirteen trials in Nuremburg, Germany during the period of 1945-1949. Party bureaucrats, German business owners, lawyers and doctors were accused of crimes against peace and humanity. Pressured by the trials Adolf Hitler committed suicide not to go to trial.…
The judges were from the Allied powers and they oversaw twenty-two of the major criminals (Nuremberg). Over half of the Nazis were sentenced to death while most of the defendants actually admitted to the crimes they were accused of (Nuremberg). Some of the criminals said they were just following orders of a higher authority, but yet, they seemed not to even blink an eye when tormenting and killing the victims. It just seemed that when the criminals admitted to their crimes that that was the key in figuring out the Holocaust did occur. During the trials, eyewitnesses had reports of Nazi atrocities in Poland and brought them to the Allied governments…
About 6 million Jews, 3 million Soviet prisoners of war, 3 million Poles, 700,000 Serbs, 250,000 Gypsies, 80,000 German political prisoners, 70,000 disabled people, 12,000 homosexuals, and 2,500 Jehovah's Witnesses were brutally murdered by the Nazis. As a result of this slaughter on a grand scale, the term genocide was introduced to international law. Although it would be impossible to try every the most senior officer to the youngest member of Hitler Youth, there must be a punishment for their…
War often carries enormous human costs, but we recognize that the imperative of stopping or preventing genocide or other systematic slaughter can sometimes justify the use of military force. For that reason, Human Rights Watch has on rare occasion advocated humanitarian intervention—for example, to stop ongoing genocide in Rwanda and Bosnia. Understood as a humanitarian intervention, our purpose is not to say whether the U.S.-led coalition should have gone to war for other reasons. That, as noted, involves judgments beyond our mandate.…
The Nuremberg Trials were held to bring Nazi criminals to justice. It was a series of thirteen trials, the most famous being the trial for war criminals. The defendants were high ranking military officers who had commited war crimes, crimes against peace, and crimes against humanity.…
Years of immense hatred and the desire to protect are as similar as night and day. World War II had many victims. The Jews and the Japanese were two of many groups forced into being one of these victims. During the war Jews were put into concentration camps located throughout and around Germany and Japanese American citizens were gather from around the U.S. and put into internment camps located near the center of the U.S. Even though both were relocated to camps, the Japanese internment camps were nothing compared to the nightmares the Jewish faced. The main differences between the concentration and internment camps were, the Jews were stripped of their rights, the reason of making the camps were very different, and the Jews were mistreated.…