On the opposite view from nativist, children have universal grammar from birth. This perspective proposed by Chomsky in Fellowes and Oakley (2010) that children have the competency to learn any language. Nativist theory places emphasis on biological reason on how children develop their language. The nativist perspective encounters criticism of omitting environment and social influences that play a role in children’s language development. Further account by Fellowes and Oakley (2010) state nativist perspective portrays teachers will not need to teach language if children will naturally learn all they need to know.
Whatever the theories propose, teachers can embrace different cultures in which children bring to the classroom their languages.
Whatever the theories propose, teachers can embrace different cultures in which children bring to the classroom their languages.