Compare And Contrast The Indeterminate And The Determinate Model

Improved Essays
The United States criminal justice system is made up of two models that criminals face concerning the sentencing phase of the courts. The two are indeterminate model and the determinate model. When you look at both of these models there are advantages and disadvantage that effect not only society but the criminals that are to fulfill the path of the models. The sentencing in the indeterminate model is formatted for rehabilitation of the inmate through his/her positive action while incarcerated. This positive rehabilitation sets up the end result of being released from the sentencing imposed for the crime. The other area of the sentencing is the determinate model that is focused on sentencing all criminal sin the same manner in the criminal …show more content…
The other aspects of the model allows the inmate after fulfilling the rehabilitation requirement in the system to be returned back into society. This fulfillment in the rehabilitation process would be better review by the personal in the correctional profession (Parole board) then the setting judge on the case. These personal know the correctional process and how it applies to inmates serving time. The arguments to this model are from the inmates that state that it violates their due process. The inmates state that because the sentencing does not provide a release date this action falls under the element of cruel and unusual punishment. Society argument is that the inmates will have no consistency with the justice system in sentencing. One inmate may receive a different sentence then someone else who commits the same crime. The other aspects of the indeterminate model is that the judges and parole board may use a bias and stereotyping when handing down the requirements in the correctional system either upon the sentencing or parole board actions. There is some concerns as to the real action of indeterminate sentencing which links the seriousness of the offense and severity of …show more content…
Both models have arguments that suggest positives and negatives. Each one of the theories are different with their argument for approval of criminology. The explanation of the process in the two models shows that there is not one action that fits all crimes and people. This shows that each inmate committed a crime for a different reason against society. These reasons they commit the crimes do not fall in one area of the criminological theory but shows they intersect between all three theories. It is not simply sufficient to say that one criminal committed a crime in one theory so that criminal should be sentenced according to a definitive model. When a person in society commits a crime the system needs to understand the different attributes associated with that crime which inevitably will lead to complications. Both the determinate and indeterminate models have positives and negatives. These results can both potentially exonerate and decimate inmates. The end results the inmates need to understand is that it is their choice to utilize the programs set in place. The use of these resources in the system will assist them with the integrating back into society. The inmates initiative, criminological theories and sentencing models will always be

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    As prior mentioned when one is released from imprisonment an ex offender becomes irresponsible of himself. Therfore rehabilitation works personally with the offender and encourages individual responsibilities. Correspondingly as well as rehabilitating it is also imperative to look beyond the actual punishment itself. Although rehabilitation is a form of control mechanism the prospect of commiting future crimes must not be disregarded .Ex- Offenders should be socially integrated and be in a situation to redress and repair themselves to the state their were originally in. However rehabilitating process is testing due to the prison culture and environment.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Another practice that would be enforced is to reinforce positive change in behavior and to cease the connotation of violence amongst the prisoners and within the prisons. In addition, properly train the guards to prevent instances such as inmate abuse by the guards. Lastly, is a fair procedure where individuals will receive a proper verdict and sentences for their offenses. For instance, conviction would be determined by the magnitude of the offense,…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Brutality And Crime

    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Third theory: which can measure the level of brutality or violence associated with a crime as well as explanation of behaviour associated with the different levels. Till now brutality/violence associated with a crime seems to be only due to psychological factor. We don’t have any theory to explain why the level of brutality vary in different crime. Social scientists have integrated violence with the psychopath but they have not explained the cause of varying level of brutality. Further studies and rigorous research method are required if we want to cover each and every aspect of criminal…

    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Incarceration, sanctions and control, community programs, and treatment are the four main approaches to the punishment and rehabilitation of offenders. Prisons are designed to remove the offender from society, restricting civil freedoms, and limiting the individual’s capability to make liberated decisions (Schmalleger, 2014). Although incarceration is one of the most severe punishments, the other methods also implement similar traits to incarceration. Sanctions and community programs offer limitations to the offender creating a prison without incarceration. The offender may not be locked in a cell but they are subjected to strict guidelines offering a controlled rehabilitation process.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many question the judges sentencing that offenders receive to place them in jail or prison because they are just flat out dangerous and remain a threat to be put in a treatment or a particular program that suits the offender’s needs. Treatment programs only pertain to drug abusers and addicts. Nonviolent offenders can possibly even participate in community service or house arrest. In many states, I think they favor the early release and the granting of parole to those offenders who aren’t really a threat to make room for the new prisoners who deserve to be in prison. The article states a good point about alternatives to reducing prison population and overcrowding: Along the same lines, many opponents believe that community-based corrections programs can also be used as an alternative to incarceration, at the discretion of judges.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Parole officers helps inmates with job training, rehabilitation, abuse counseling, anger management sections, and other programs that will help the inmate to get ready to reenter to the society. Parole is a contract between the state and the offender. If the offender is able to obey the terms of the contract, freedom is maintained. If a violation of these conditions occurs ( like if the offender commits a new crime or is charged with a new crime) the parole board may…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Retribution and Rehabilitation Looking at both sides of an imposed sentence can be tricky. On the retribution side of sentencing a judge or magistrate may feel the offender deserves the sentence for the crime they stand before them on without looking at the recidivism possibility. Often, when a judge or magistrate looks at the possibility of recidivism, they tend to learn towards a sentence structured around rehabilitation to help reduce the offender’s chance of committing crimes in the future. Both positions have a place in handing down fair and just sentences. The decision of what type of sentence to impose and which one will work best for each individual criminal are things that come together before the court as a joint effort by many parties…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Each of the sentences has its own flaws. Determinate sentence can eliminate the judge’s bias by giving equal sentence to all criminals. The judge has little discretion on the sentencing. This sentence mainly focus on giving punishiment based on the seriouness of the crime. However, determinate sentence failed to considers that not every criminal is the same person (Hayes, 2006).…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Possibly allowing offenders to move to a low security prison-upon release- would enable them to grow a sense of responsibility and help them successfully re-enter into society. In conclusion, solving the factors that contribute to recidivism would ultimately help with re-entry for the offender. Some the factors that should be resolved include lowering the social stigma of a once convicted felon, the limited resources, and de-prisonization. Successful re-entry is difficult but with the help and support from society it could be possible…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Parole is conducted differently in each state (Latessa & Smith, 2011). Parole is also an important part of reentry into the community for offenders (Latessa & Smith, 2011). There are a number of factors that influence parole boards’ decisions to grant parole to an inmate. Good behavior of offenders during their incarceration time is one factor.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays