Compare And Contrast The Federalist And The Anti Federalists

Improved Essays
The Federalists and the Anti Federalists have different viewpoints on the clauses presented. The federalist paper number 33 presents the argument that the Federal government is granted authority to make all laws that are necessary and proper for the United States. These laws are to be the supreme law of the land. The Antifederalists disagreed with this idea because they believed it would give too much power to the Federal Government leaving the people and the state governments vulnerable. The federalists saw the idea of doing what is necessary and proper for everyone the best possible solution to the United States. It is necessary for the federal government to have the necessary power for the states to follow in order for the nation to stay …show more content…
While the anti federalists only focus on what they do not like about the current government. The anti federalists fail to realize that the legislature of the federal government cooperate together from different branches that they created themselves. Each branch of the federal government check the other to make sure only the most important and efficient laws actually pass. The judicial branch checks and makes sure that laws are interpreted the way they are supposed to. This branch does not work to cooperate with the other branches to take over the United States and gain complete control of everyone inside the country. The anti federalists see the federal government as one that agree with each other and that will simply pass any law that they wish in order to make them richer and stronger, but in reality only truly necessary laws would be allowed to pass. They forget what happened back in the late 1700s when states and their governments power were greatly uneven. The states that could offer more economically would inevitably have more power leaving other states weak. The federal government helped fix this problem by creating a Union that helped every state. In more recent time, in the 1900s the power between state government and federal government fluctuated. At some point the state government did not want help from the federal …show more content…
The federalists knew that the government they were implementing would have many checks and balances that would help secure the safety of the people, states, and ultimately the government. The anti federalists brutus papers number five and six did not see it this way and instead misapplied the federal government as a complete power as a whole instead of separate

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Anti Federalists Essay

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Under the Articles the states had the power to make laws and do whatever they pleased, and to some of the states the idea of changing to a government that the central government had all the power was absolutely absurd. Other people felt as if the new Constitution had no separation of powers. They felt as if the branches had too much power and there was nothing keeping one branch from becoming too powerful (Doc 2). The Anti-Federalists did not want to be in the same kind of government they fought so hard to get away from. The Anti-Federalists were also frustrated with the fact that the new Constitution laid out all the rules, but did not list any rights the people had.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It gave them a chance to start a new form of government without a king. The only problem was Hamilton and Jefferson did not have the same idea of the type of government they wanted to accomplish for their new nation. Hamilton wanted to accomplish a strong central government. He wanted a government that would be able to control the people’s behavior. He understood that “sometimes good people do bad things and bad people do good things”, this gave Hamilton an advantage because Jefferson did not recognize this.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The federalists supported the idea of stronger power concentrated at the federal government. They believed in a strong central government that would rule the people of the United States directly, have great power and control almost all issues within the country. They perceived it as the most effective way to keep order and to protect citizens’ rights. The idea of weak central government and different sets of rules for every state seemed to them disastrous as the nation would not be united and people’s right can be easily infringed. Anti-federalist ideas of running the country were extremely different.…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Checks and Balances is a system used by the U.S government to limit the power of each branch so that every branch is equal in power and no branch has too much power. This Checks and Balances system is important to our government because if not, one branch would take over the others and there would be no control or equality with the power our government has and is given by the people. The colonists past experiences with British rule led to the fear of creating a strong central government. Because of this fear the Articles of Confederation seemed like an amazing constitution for the U.S. It established a weak national (federal) government and strong state governments.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Extended Republic

    • 1812 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Feasibility of an Extended Republic in America Governments are only as effective as their structure allows them to be. A government that is large and unwieldy will rarely be efficient due to the red tape and bureaucracy bogging it down. The power structure in a monarchy differs from the structure in a republic. When deciding the shape of the American government, the Founding Fathers carefully considered all shapes and sizes of government to try and find what would suit the new nation the best in the wake of the Articles of Confederation. Their decision to establish an extended republic was a revolutionary idea that attracted much criticism and attention because it was an untested idea.…

    • 1812 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    However the people as individuals do not have a direct vote to make sure who they want will be in political office for any branch. In Federalist 68, Publius agrees the Electoral College is necessary because the people are too prone to make mistakes. The electors that cast the votes will be better informed about government than the people so they know what the country really needs. Publius says the Electoral College provides a filter for the people. Brutus also states that the judicial branch is actually the most powerful.…

    • 3876 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Our founders distrusted direct democracy, and prefered a representative form of government because direct democracy gives too much power to the majority; ensuring that the general will, will always prevail. Even The Articles of confederation, a form of government that favored general will over the federal government so much so the federal government had so little power, it couldn't even get the states to pay their war debts, was not a direct democracy. England was a representative government as well, but they represented the people by social class; our founders did not agree that this was a fair and just way of governing. SImilar to England to vote in america one had to qualify; you had to be a white male who owned land. Unlike england; land was fairly easy to acquire in America, so around seventy percent of the white population could vote.…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Congress decided their current form of government, the Articles of Confederation, had many flaws. It was too weak to stop things such as Shay’s Rebellion. Because of this they organized a convention, many state representatives showed up, but some did not because they were pleased with how it was and didn’t want to change this. The people who were against changing the Articles of Confederation are called Anti-Federalists, and people that were for this are called Federalists. As a Federalist I believe the people of the United States should ratify the Constitution because we would fall to pieces without it.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Regarding to the citizens, most of the citizens were against the Anti-Federalists view, as they believe the nation is weak enough already, and a centralized power is exactly what it needs. Despite the majority of the citizen’s opinion, the Anti-Federalists were still concerned about the Bill of Rights, and the preservation of certain rights of the people; such as trial by jury, freedom of speech, and other basic rights. They also express their thought on the power of the central government in the United States; saying that a nation as large as the Unite States could not be possibly controlled by one national government even though the constitution have granted them power. Despite the Anti-Federalists unity in opposing the ratification of the constitution, they could not come to an agreement on an alternative to operate the government. This made them…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    84, Alexander Hamilton presented the reasons why he thought a bill of rights was not a necessary component of the proposed Constitution and how it could fire back or create complication. He explains that the idea of a bill of rights originated with kings whose powers needed to be examined or checked. In Hamilton's eyes the Constitution already checks the powers of the federal government because there are limits on what each branch can do, and there is no single, centralized official with unlimited powers. Hamilton says that under the Constitution, the people ultimately have all the power and individual rights and that the entire Constitution is in itself a bill of rights. He argues that by listing rights, it could imply that government has the power to limit the people's rights and power in other…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays