Socrates is a philosopher known for his teachings in Athens. He taught his entire life, where no one would bother him. Socrates was accused of corrupting the youth and inventing new gods at the age of seventy. For varies reasons which will be discussed later, the city of Athens chose to wait till this age to prosecute and execute him. Socrates chose to accept his fate instead of escaping to avoid execution.…
The final reason Socrates presents against Crito’s offer of help is the Agreement Argument. The Agreement Argument follows that by participating in Athenian society, the citizens of Athens have implicitly agreed to obey the Laws. Socrates made an agreement to the State to follow the Laws, and it is just to keep to one's agreements, and so to escape would be to break an agreement and so Socrates ought not to escape with Crito (Plato, 1997b, §51c-52d). This agreement refers to is a form of political obligation which relies on the idea of tacit consent, which is formed solely by living as a citizen of Athens. Tacit consent is the idea that by living in Athens, the citizens have agreed to follow the Laws of Athens implicitly by benefiting from the organization, protection, and education of the State.…
Socrates, more than most, ought to be as per this agreement, as he has carried on seventy years completely content with the Athenian lifestyle. If Socrates somehow managed to break from jail now, having so reliably approved the social contract, he would be making himself a bandit who might not be welcome in some other enlightened state for whatever is left of his life. Furthermore, when he bites the dust, he will be cruelly judged in the underworld for carrying on shamefully towards his city's laws. Subsequently, Socrates persuades Crito that it would be better not to endeavor a getaway.…
The main theme of the book of Crito is about whether should Socrates break the law and escape from execution or stay and accept his death penalty. At the very end, Socrates pointed out that trying to escape breaks the law, and any act that breaks the law is unjust . Therefore, Socrates refused to escape and decided to accept his death penalty and execution. Socrates responded each of the three arguments Crito brought out. However, are Socrates’ arguments reasonable and is it always right to obey the law regarding the law itself is morally justice or injustice?…
Socrates agrees that he has given those possibilities some thought. Crito tries to diminish these fears by telling him that those who would turn them in would be cheaply bought out, and that he shouldn’t be worried to be in exile as there would be those who would help him wherever he went. In a last attempt, Crito tries to appeal to Socrates’ moral beliefs. He tells him that he doesn’t “think that what [he] propose[s] … is even just” (Cahn 507).…
In Plato’s Crito, Socrates received a visit from his friend Crito, who was trying to convince him to escape, but failed to succeed. Crito explained to Socrates the reasons why he should want to live and Socrates responded with reasons why he should not escape. Crito was positive that it took more courage to live than to die, primarily because Socrates was wrongfully accused of being a physicalist and /or a sophist and now was destined to die. He was unjustly incriminated! He had all the rights to fight for justice, in his case escape death, and instead he cut- short and waited for the end of his life.…
He is also faced with a decision to follow the unjust law in escaping jail or the just law in remaining and facing death. Conflicted, Socrates explores the meaning of just and unjust laws. King explores similar terrains in asking the question, "How can you advocate breaking the laws and obeying others? " In the end, Socrates convinces Crito that it would be best to remain in jail and not attempt an escape.…
In the opening dialogue of the Crito, we find Socrates in a prison prior to his execution. Socrates awakens to find his old friend Crito sitting outside his cell “I have been marveling at you, when I see how peaceful you’ve been sleeping” (43b). Crito has come to convince and persuade Socrates to escape his his sentence of execution “I think that if you die it won’t just be one misfortune”(44c). Yet Socrates presents many arguments and lays out the principals that he has chosen to live his life by.…
The following essay will discuss Socrates reasons for refusing Crito’s offer of help in Crito, as well as whether or not these refusals are justified. We will discuss each of Socrates reasons for refusing in turn, criticising each as we move through the dialogue. Crito raises the problem of the extent to which a moral person is obligated to their City State (referred to as Athens and the State throughout), as well as the individual's dedication to the central principle of the dialogue; never doing any wrong. We will focus on the idea that by being wronged by the State, Socrates’ obligation is dissolved but his reasons remain justified due to his dedication to the avoidance of wrongdoing and Plato's need to have Socrates be a consistent character and this being the sole justification for his refusal. Socrates gives four reasons as to why he refuses Crito’s offer of escape.…
He tells Crito the hypothetical conversation he would have with the state if he were to escape. Socrates believes that the state would tell him that, "One must obey the commands of one's city and country, nor persuade it as the nature of justice. It is impious to bring violence to bear against your mother or father; it is more so to use it against your country" (54). Since it is a Greek value to put the state over everything, Socrates should not value his life over the state. The state raised Socrates, and he had the opportunity his whole life to leave the state if he were unhappy, however he did not. He liked the state for their justice system, their laws, and their lifestyle.…
Throughout their conversation, Crito discusses with Socrates why he believes Socrates should flee. However, this leads Socrates to question the power of state and the laws. The Laws that make up the state is a crucial factor in “Crito”. In fact, the Laws are so important in Socrates 's discussion that they become a voice, almost like another person. He thinks thoroughly and examines them because he believes that every citizen has an agreement with Laws.…
Do you think Socrates did the right thing by allowing himself to be unjustly executed? Socrates had made an intelligent decision by sacrificing himself to protect the “Social contract” between the state and him, rather than escape from prison to break the rules. Use life to exchange for the preservation of his thought Escape from the prison is equivalent to destruct all of his thought and value what he had constructed during his lifetime. Because leaving Athens is kind of actions to contradict what he taught to his followers, be faithful to the righteousness.…
In The Crito, Plato illustrates Socrates in a complete contrast to the image that the reader captured in The Apology. In the dialogue between Crito and Socrates, Crito tries to convince Socrates that escaping out of jail is the right the thing to do. Crito first argues by explaining that it would be wrong for Socrates to throw his life away in prison because if he decides to remain in prison then he will be doing exactly what his enemies intended to do. Crito continues his argument by explaining that if he were to remain in jail he will be silenced, thus, Socrates would be conspiring with other people who are trying to do something unethical. Crito continues by brining forth Socrates’ children and how they would be affected and would be left without a father, however, Socrates isn’t convinced by Crito’s…
Perhaps Socrates realized the courts were right in his sentence because he was not truly wise and had in fact corrupted the minds of the youth. Or, maybe he knew that if he was to be acquitted of the charges he would continue his teachings and probably end up back in jail, and would rather not waste the time and effort. Or, maybe Socrates’ love of Athens and the respect he had for the government and the courts decision stopped him from fleeing his death…
Socrates and Rene Descartes are alike in their most fundamental motives but yet contrasting in results both trying to improve thinking but about two different things. One example would be how they each convey their message formal versus informal, another would be their life style and beliefs of how things should be done. Both Socrates and Descartes have completely different views on getting their desired results, and the level of risk one is willing to take to accomplish certain results. Socrates and Descartes even had vastly different upbringing, and views on which sciences are important and others’ inferior to the rest.…