Compare And Contrast Smith And Marx

Improved Essays
Smith and Marx created the industrial revolution and they have some similar ideas and have different ideas of our economy. Smith and Marx only in common was the creation of the industrial revolution. These two economies guys do not have much common, in fact that they have the opposite ideas from another. Smith ideas is the Laisser-faire where the economy is not to have the government be involved with it and he think the economy will fix itself that is the visible hand. Marx idea is different and he think that the government should be involved. Marx idea opposite of the visible hand is a process full of pitfalls, with crisis or malfunction. The three natural laws Smith came up with are the law of self-interest that makes our life better, the law of competition to make better product, and the law of supply and demand. These laws will …show more content…
Marx idea counter those laws by adding about that the labors factories workers were the one who are suffering by having their pay decreased and the owners continues to gain more capitals. As times goes on the poor gets poorer and the wealthy gets wealthier. Everyone shares the the profit having an equal amount, so that the social classes free because an communism. Everything is owned by the people, private property would disappear, and all factory, mines, and business owned by the people. Food is shade equal to all. On Smith idea on the free market allow to have other business to not be controlled by the government by telling one person to just have a coal business and the other do something else. With this the economy can grow by having a furniture business having competition with another furniture business that end up with both of those to grow. It liking having a rival, wanting to making your product better, however I think if a small business try have competition against a big business. The small business will probably fail because they can’t get consumer to get in. The big business get all the consumer from

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Adam Smith and Jean Rousseau both at unique ways at looking at social thought. Smith is the father of modem economics. Smith’s ideas are more focused on relationships between economics and society. Rousseau was a social and political philosopher. His ideas were linked to social unequally within society.…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Marx thought it only a matter of time before the working class as a whole rose up and over threw the rich. That the line would eventually be pushed too far, that the workers would reach the end of what they were willing to endure. Bourgeois and proletarians, or the rich and the poor were in a constant struggle for control and that the proletarians would eventually rise up and take control of what was rightfully theirs. That the workers could and would take being ground into the dirt for the gain of others for only so long. Once the proletarians had taken control, the means of production would be distributed among publically owned corporations.…

    • 2117 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the many centuries and decades that have passed us by there were many great philosophers. These brilliant minds created theories, examples, and opinions on topics that are still controversial in our time today. The two that I’d like to draw attention to are Andrew Carnegie and Karl Marx. Although, their opinions are similar they have different standpoints on the ways our economies would become more efficient. In the Gospel of Wealth, Carnegie’s views were open-minded.…

    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The classical liberal ideas of limited government and laissez-faire capitalism impacted the 19th century society because of how there was no regulations or rules in the economy. The capitalist economy was based on Adam Smith’s idea of the invisible hand, where there was no government involvement or the “hands off approach”. The classical liberal idea of no government involvement had a large impact on society. There were no laws protecting workers, minimum wage, the environment, or child labor. This allowed workers to be easily exploited by the owners of factories or mines.…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is where Marx’s political beliefs ties into his economic beliefs. He criticized the exploitation of workers and described a socialist alternative to capitalism. (Stanford Table 4.1 chart.pg 60). Marx’s ideal solution is a socialist economy. Most Capitalist business owners are grossly overpaid in comparison to their workers who are actually doing the labor.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adam Smith was an economist from the mid-late 1700’s and he was able to explain the knowledge of Capitalism; elaborating on how to make money from the free markets that was influential to survival at that time. He wrote a book, An Inquiry Into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, which describes the origins of Capitalism in great details with petty examples of this logic set in motion. On the other side of the spectrum, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels both produce a collaborative piece called The Communist Manifesto which heavily criticizes the bourgeoisie, and pushes for a lifestyle in which all property is government owned; eliminating the class system and having all people of the nation work for the same salary. There is a stark…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx adamantly believed in the power of a classless society. The prerequisites to implementing such a system, however, include considerable regulations on property, economic activity, and other aspects of civilization that John Stuart Mill was a proponent of de-regulating. Marx argued, “[The fall of the bourgeoisie] and the victory of the proletariat is inevitable,” (80) essentially claiming that he believed the forces of the economy would naturally move towards communism. In a society where all citizens are treated equally and given the same amount despite what they put in, the economy will collapse. There is no force of self-interest to incentivize the population to push forward.…

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Adam Smith does not reference literature in the book, but critiques instead the policy. In the Plan of the Work Smith indicates that the mercantile system seeks to enrich a nation through a particular policy regime. Smith believed that instead a nation enriches itself better without any such regulation. Smith believes that these theories have not only influenced policy, but also education and also the conduct of sovereign states. Book four is in fact the only book with a reference to ‘the invisible hand’.…

    • 1645 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thomas More visualized the Utopia as a perfect society. The United States of America has always tried to build a perfect country or society which is built by people. A perfect society depends on the system of government, resources, and the nature of humans. Utopia is a perfect society because they have a perfect government; they have enough resources which are distributed evenly among all the people. Also, the people living in Utopia choose to obey laws for peace which makes the society perfect.…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    [...] in the same way the worker’s activity is not his spontaneous activity. It belongs to another; it is the loss of his self.” (Marx 74) Smith would likely argue to this that the loss of physical and mental energy as well as the loss of self is simply the price of the labour, that the worker earns it back with his wage. Assuming perfect liberty, labor cannot be “forced labor” because the worker always has the opportunity to leave, find work elsewhere, or not work as all. The worker chooses to give up his labor, and give up his self in order to exchange it for other commodities according to his self…

    • 2003 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This new social order calls for an egalitarian society and collective ownership of all resources to ensure equal distribution of wealth. Evidently, both Marx and Smith propose vastly different systems in order to reach the same goal, which is socio-economic prosperity. Adam Smith and Karl Marx were two intellectuals, among many, who acknowledged that the division of labour was a principal element of the Industrial Revolution, although they both had radically different conclusions about the process. Indeed, Smith lived in a time that was vastly different Marx’s age. British society, which was then mercantilist, was only just beginning to enter the Industrial Age when Smith was born.…

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    (88 MSOMT) It is suggested that Marx became interested in capitalism when he saw the “unanticipated effects” of capitalism. (64 eicst)This is arguably his most important scientific contribution as it looks further than his fellow political economists. They looked at private property commodities, profit and the division of…

    • 1578 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Conflicting Views of Adam Smith and Karl Marx on the Division of Labor and the Role of Money in Exchange In their works, Adam Smith and Karl Marx prove to have differing opinions on money and the division of labor. Although they understand money as a representation of value and as a medium of exchange, they arrive at different conclusions about the role of money in social life. Smith sees the division of labor as a constructive system and a means of furthering exchange, leading to the use of money. Marx, on the other hand, finds labor to turn human beings into alienated workers, and the division of labor to spread and increase this concept.…

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The two authors have both a similar and very different view of labor and economics. Considering Marx is from Germany, he has strong views. He is obviously, the communist/socialist. His basic belief is that wealth is the direct result of labor. He believes that what you put in is what you get out.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It would not be advantageous to us or to anyone if we exploited consumers, therefore, Marx’s proposed regulation and redistribution is ridiculous and would never work as a viable system in the real…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays