Compare And Contrast Simmon V. Englandia

Improved Essays
Simmon's execution. During this time the U.S. Supreme Court decided Atkins v. Virginia ruled that executing the mentally disabled violated the Eighth and fourteenth Amendment prohibitions on cruel and unusual punishment because a majority of Americans found it cruel and unusual. This made the Missouri Supreme Court decide to reconsider Simmons' case. Using the reasoning from the Atkins case, the Missouri court decided that the U.S. Supreme Court's 1989 decision in Stanford v. Kentucky, which held that executing minors was not unconstitutional, was no longer valid. The opinion in Stanford v. Kentucky had relied on a finding that a majority of Americans did not consider the execution of minors to be cruel and unusual. The Missouri court, citing

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Question 2: In Commonwealth v. Aves and Sim’s case 7 Cushy, chief justice Shaw came to two entirely different verdicts, which lead to massive controversy and questioning about his inconsistency on slavery issues. In Commonwealth v. Aves, Chief Justice Shaw made the decision to grant a 6-year-old girl named Med freedom after her “owner” voluntarily brought her into a free state (where slavery was abolished). A key term within this statement is that she was voluntarily brought into the free state; she did not escape from her masters. At this time, slaves were considered property of their owners, which technically means that comity, should be exercised.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    January 17, 1981, in Jefferson County, Kentucky the petitioner Kevin Stanford was involved in the shooting death of a 20-year-old woman by the name of Barbel Poore, who was working as an attendant at a gas station when a heinous crime took place. Not only did Stanford kill Barbel Poore, prior to her killing, she was robbed, raped as well as sodomized by Stanford and his accomplice. According to the documents, Barbara lost her life for a mere 300 carton of cigarettes, two gallons of fuel, and a small amount of cash. Although killing someone is never justifiable, often times there is usually a reason for killing a victim, for instance, she fought back or she threatened to alert the authorities. Surprisingly, Barbel did neither and yet she was…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kansas Vs Crane Case Study

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Kansas v Crane I. Synopsis Based off the 1997 previous case of Kansas v Hendricks that upheld the constitutionality of the Kansas Sexually Predator Act that confined persons who were likely to engage in sexual violence. In upholding the constitutionality, the court deemed that sexual offender confinement would now be considered civil instead of criminal. So when Michael Crane, who previously was a sex offender who had a mental abnormality was committed, the court found him to civil confinement.…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Case Review Simmons

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Afterward, Simmons appealed his conviction, and filed a direct appeal and petition to both state and federal postconviction relief. His direct appeal and petition were rejected by both state and federal postconviction relief. After being rejected he filed a new petition for state postconviction relief, saying that both the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments forbid the death penalty on offenders convicted of a crime they committed when they were under the age of eighteen. The Supreme Court agreed with Simmons and sentenced him to life in prison without eligibility to be released. The Simmons vs Roper case ruled the decision that the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments forbid the death penalty on…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Buck V. Jail Case Analysis

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Buck v. Bail court case during 1920's, is concreted to be one of the worst rulings of the Supreme Court in the history of American law. During the 1920’s court case in Virginia, the Supreme Court supported sterilization of so-called mental defectives or imbeciles American’s. The First person who was reported to undergo sterilization was a young poor woman by the name of Carrie Buck. According to the Buck v. Bail video Carrie Buck was confined in the Virginia State colony for the epileptics and the feeble-minded though she was neither epileptic nor mentally disabled, eight judges ruled that the state of Virginia had the right to sterilize her, her mother Emma and as well as her Daughter Vivienne (Democracy Now).…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Court stated that unless a uniform policy of determining who is eligible for capital punishment exists. The death penalty will be regarded as “cruel and unusual punishment.” Due to the Furman v. Georgia case, the death penalty was ruled illegal within the United States in…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court ruled that the execution of minors is cruel and punishment prohibited by the 8th…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Case Summary #1: Ashcroft V. American Civil Rights Union. This was a case in 2004 where the American Civil Rights Union in collaboration with online publishers went to court to protest against the Child Online Protection Act (COPA) which barred publishers from posting pornographic material in the internet, with an aim of protecting the minors. The accuser argued that such a law violated. After hearing the case, the Supreme Court referred it to the Third Circuit citing that “community standards” were alone not enough to warrant the Act unconstitutional.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Re Gault Case Essay

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The first case that stuck out with me the most was the In re Gault case of 1967. This case focused on a youth named Gerald Gault who was 15 at the time of the supposed offense. I feel this kid was railroad from the beginning his rights were violated in many ways. He did not receive the right to counsel, notice of charges, questioning of witness because the witness did not show up for the proceedings, protection against self-incrimination, a transcript of the proceeding, nor and appellate review all these things were denied. www.ncjrs.gov I believe it was important in establishing the due process clause of the 14th Amendment which was violated.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cole Cannon Case Summary

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The U.S. Supreme Court would judge the case on whether sentencing a fourteen-year-old to life in prison without parole violates the Eight and Fourteenth Amendment’s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment (Carrizales & Schultz, n.d.). Miller’s counsel argued that sentencing a fourteen-year-old to life without parole without considering certain factors such as his age violates the Eight and Fourteenth Amendments’ ban on cruel and unusual punishment (Carrizales & Schultz, n.d.). The state of Alabama argued that punishing a fourteen-year-old to life without parole does not violate the Eight or Fourteenth Amendment, but serves a justifiable penological goal when the crime is aggravated murder (Carrizales & Schultz,…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    8th Amendment Essay

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In 1910, Weems v. United States allowed the Court to more loosely interpret the Eighth Amendment. The concurring emphasized that the interpretation of the Constitution, particularly the Cruel and Unusual Punishment clause, would change over time and that the Court would similarly have to adapt its views. 47 years later, the Court would formalize this idea in Trop v. Dulles. They asserted that the Eighth Amendment should be interpreted with society’s “evolving standards of decency”. The “evolving standards of decency” component of the Cruel and Unusual Punishment clause would later be cited in landmark juvenile death penalty…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Who can be executed? Under the Eighth Amendment, the punishment must be related to the crime, so the execution is appropriate for all murder cases. The new death penalty laws require judges and juries to consider aggravating and mitigating factors in each capita case and to apply the death to all heinous crimes. The Eighth Amendment finds justice should be served in all heinous crimes and those may be sentenced to death.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Furman V. Georgia, the court issued its most significant ruling regarding the death penalty. Rather than focus on the physical and emotional pain of the prisoner as the grounds for capital punishment to be considered cruel and unusable, Furman 's defense argued that the death penalty was arbitrary and capricious. This argument presented evidence that a person convicted of a capital punishment may or may not be executed because the law and the state courts did not systematically apply the death penalty. But in 1976, the U.S. Supreme Court issued another landmark decision in Gregg V. Georgia, which required bifurcated trail structure. This required that trails for capital offenses had to be conducted in two separate parts.…

    • 2582 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Evan Miller has had a rough upbringing. He has had emotional abandonment from his alcoholic and drug abused mother, his abusive father and forced to be placed in multiple foster cares throughout his childhood. Miller is a prime example of an abandoned, troubled minor, whose true destiny has been destroyed due to these circumstances. The problems he has faced steered him to being depressed and unsatisfied, using drugs, alcohol and four suicide attempts to trying and fulfill the emptiness he has been feeling his entire life.…

    • 1439 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Contracts are an integral part of society, having strong legal contractual principles gives confidence to consumers, investors and anyone who wishes to enter into a contract. Entering in a contract shows that in a primitive way that two parties are on the same page, however it is noted that a high proportion of litigation does actually stem from misunderstood contract (Duxbury (2011)).In this scenario Gary believes he has a valid contract with Mike and is disappointed to learn that Mike has sold on the Bike to Liz (third party). Using previous cases as precedent and analysing the conditions in which a contract is made, advice will be given to Gary on his legal position in regards to the contract and whether there is any suitable remedy that…

    • 1534 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays