Roman Empire Vs Han Dynasty Essay

Improved Essays
Two thousand years ago both the Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty were thriving in Italy and China respectively. These two powerful civilizations had completely opposite religions and Government structures, but yet both were able to function as a thriving societies until. Although the Han Dynasty and Roman Empire were based on two completely different beliefs and Government structures, they both had corrupt Governments by the end of their reigns that lead to a weakened army, and lead to terrible living conditions for their citizens, which ultimately lead to both downfalls. Although the Government systems were complete opposites in China and Rome, but both of their leaders were more interested in themselves than the people. In the late Roman …show more content…
The Roman Republic/Empire once had the strongest army in the world with many great accomplishments, including defeating Hannibal and his army. When the decline began Rome’s army was significantly weakened and frankly neglected by the Government: “One thing is clear, however. Weakened by a shortage of manpower, the Roman Empire in the west simply not able to fend off hoards of people invading Italy and Gaul.”. If more attention or funding was given to the military it was very possible that the army could have fending off these invaders as it was once able too. Similarly, the Han Dynasty was not able to keep out invaders because of how little attention they gave to their armies: “The Han also continued to have problems with the Xianguo beyond the Great Wall to the North. Professional armies recruited from non-Chinese peoples along the peripheries of the Empire proved to be unreliable in both performance and loyalty.”. The army that the Han managed was not strong enough to fight off these invaders and even hiring a private army did not do the task for the Han. If the Han had focused on their existing army in the first place there would have never been a need to bring in external forces, which were both expensive and unsuccessful.
Although the Han Dynasty and Roman Empire were constructed very differently, they both had corrupt Governments

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    To begin, the Western Roman Empire’s military was very weak because it had a lot of problems finding solders and supplying the funds to pay for their military needs. According to document 5 it says that the reason there was a “military crisis” was because there was a “lack of children” to grow up and become soldiers. In document 8 it says that it was hard to recruit troops so they were “reduced to hiring Germanic Soldiers.” This rally took a toll of the “state’s budget” at the same time as the “declining…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Romas Empire fell because they had untrained soldiers. The soldiers were untrained so that didn’t help the empire defeat invaders. The soldiers were lazy and would they their post. (Document B) When the soldiers would leave their post nobody was watching out for when the invaders would arrive.…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rome Dbq Analysis

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages

    My class notes say that Rome was having problems with having a loyal and strong army. For example, there were, “military leaders fighting among themselves”(Data Set). Another example was that there were, “troops in battle, exposed to wounds because they have no armor, think about running and not about fighting”(Document 2). Also, “Hosts of senators, bureaucrats, and clergymen were entitled the avoid the draft…”(Document 3). The Romans were so successful that they started laying back.…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imperial Rome (31 B.C.E. -476 C.E.) and Han China (206 B.C.E.-220 C.E.) are likely the two most well known empires of the time period Because of their large size and influence. When describing methods of political control, the two mirrored each other in many ways but, in some respects, had contradicting ideas. The methods of political control used by Imperial Rome and Han China were similar regarding their use of political theologies to justify leadership, their centrally structured government, and their use military power, but exhibited different roles of citizens in government and techniques for maintaining order in the lower class. In Imperial Rome and Han China, the leaders used political theologies to explain and justify their rise to…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Han dynasty and Roman Empire were two extremely powerful and successful empires. Each had useful government systems that differed from each other. Roads were also a similarity between both the Han Dynasty and Roman Empire. Also, both The Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire crashed and ended for similar reasons as well. The Han Dynasty and Roman Empire had differing government systems but were related in the fact that they each built and used road systems for trade, and their empires fell because they had the same problems.…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roman Empire Dbq Analysis

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages

    (Doc A) Without a strong leader that the people could trust, the military lost its determination making it grow weaker as time passed on. Eventually, the men in the army became so out of shape that they stopped wearing their chest plates and other heavy pieces of armour. Without the extra protection, the Roman army became susceptible to bow and arrow attacks making them much more vulnerable. They also stopped using certain weapons and tools that they had been trained to fight with in the past.…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout their time of rule both empires were imperial and under the rule of one ruler. The Romans had the Principate that called for one ruler controlling the government even though there was a senate. While the Han had rulers whom were deemed god because of what they had done for their people, and country, making both empires imperially centralized and without both aspects they probably would not have strived, and been as great as they are seen in…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Han emperors were never chosen by the army or by any institution comparable to the Roman Senate, nor were there republican ideals in China. In contrast to the graduated forms of citizenship in Rome, Han China drew no distinctions between original and…

    • 197 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Han Dynasty of China from 206 B.C.E-220 C.E. and the Imperial Roman Empire from 31 B.C.E-474 C.E., are two well known classical empires. They both contained many similarities and differences between their imperial administrations. In the Classical Period, the Han Dynasty & Imperial Rome both used their governments to establish a state religion and centralized bureaucracy. However, one major difference was that while the Han was a family dynasty, Rome was a republic. Under the rule of the Han family, and under the rule of Theodosius & Constantine, the Han and Rome established state religions.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    and 600 C.E. as a result of numerous internal and external conflicts. The Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty internally ruptured due to political ineffectiveness as a result of corrupted emperors and officials and externally disintegrated because of nomadic invasions from Germanic tribes in Western Europe and the Xiongnu in Asia. However, the Roman Empire saw the decay of the faith of the Empire in the citizens as they turned to local landlords for protection, while the local landlords of the Han Dynasty began to defy the government and conquer surrounding territories and farmland. Rome and Han China politically decentralized because of debauched emperors and officials.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The empire may still be striving today if the Roman soldiers would have remained diligent, still practicing their marches. Growing accustomed to their armor so they could actually wear it in combat.. If it weren’t for the lack of natural borders in the large empire the Huns may not have been able to inundate the land.…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pompey’s conquests sparking Caesar’s alliance with Crassus and eventual military takeover was the cause for a thinned troop force. With growing opposition surrounding them, generals thought that they could keep Rome a military superpower, but they forgot about the problems within the Roman Republic. No longer was the primary focus of a growing republic agricultural development and commerce, but now is military superiority. Revolts could not change the minds of these power hungry generals who even began reducing upper class pay to fill the void of money they had from ambitious militant campaigns. The resulting uprisings did nothing but hurt the unity of the republic even further.…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Fall Of Roman Empire Essay

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited

    Military problems were a major source of the fall of the Roman Empire. First of all, the army was made up of unmotivated soldiers. They were much less efficient than the superior soldiers that Rome had in the past, who had passion and pride for the army. This made it much more difficult to win battles. Rome lost their control over the military situations.…

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We can also assume that the Han had better control over their people and government, because unlike the Mauryans, China was very centralized. They had one capital and one ruler with absolute power. This makes it so China had very clear direction as it was only one person 's ideas being expressed through government. Mauryans also had a ruler, but he had assigned loyalties to govern smaller areas of India.…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    China and Rome both structure their societies very similarly through their military, social structure, and religions. And while these civilizations were great, when their empires fell, their falls were from the same source of problems. These civilizations also had differences through how they first started expanding, how the people they conquered assimilated, what their empire were influenced by, and what happened to China and Rome after their falls. A major similarity between China and Rome was their dependence on their military force, and how they were both extremely brutal.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays