Compare And Contrast Qin And Han Empires

Improved Essays
The Han and Qin Empires are particularly good at showing the contrast between successful and unsuccessful Empires. They both developed in a similar part of China, and are only separated by about 100 years. The Han Empire probably owes some of their success to learning form the example of the Qin Empire and not repeating the same mistakes. Shihuangdi Qin ruled by the philosophy of Legalism, which advocates extremely strict laws and harsh punishments. His extreme punishments gave him control, but led to criticism. The Han ruled with the philosophy of Confucianism, and emphasized that any qualified individual could rise in the Bureaucracy. While Shihuangdi suppressed scholars and never developed a strong bureaucracy, the Han not only had a bureaucracy,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Han Dynasty were incredibly superior in this category. The few major achievements of Athens were that Athens’ archon or leader, Solon, boosted exports in wine and olive oil, bringing in more money and he also created many government reforms. In contrast, Han China was the most advanced empire in the world at their time. They created bridges, rudders for ships and made paper. This shows great imagination and creativity, not to mention, impressive building skills.…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Qin Shi Huangdi, the first Qin emperor, envisioned a central bureaucratic structure headed by royalty to rule China under his name. Though it came at the severe cost of public sentiment, Qin was an extremely proactive emperor who implemented much of what he had envisioned before. It’s agreed upon that the Qin Dynasty laid the foundation for the massive cultural and economic development of China that took place during the Han Dynasty. Although the Qin Dynasty is easily considered among the most influential time periods in Chinese history, it actually failed to achieve many of its ideological goals. In fact, socioeconomic disparity was not eliminated and despite the ideal of enriching the lives of the common people, it was under Qin rule in which public resentment of the authoritarian government was at its peak as there were countless peasant revolts against the bureaucratic rule of China.…

    • 1590 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Han Empire shared many characteristics with the Roman Empire like their government ideology, but also differed in areas including religious influence in the government and government systems and complexity. One of the bigger similarities that the Han Empire and the Roman Empire share are their government ideals. Both government systems are based upon expansionism and had a sense of strong nationalism. Through much expansion, both empires grow to become some of the most powerful nations in the ancient world. Both governments were extremely militaristic.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imperial Rome (31 B.C.E. -476 C.E.) and Han China (206 B.C.E.-220 C.E.) are likely the two most well known empires of the time period Because of their large size and influence. When describing methods of political control, the two mirrored each other in many ways but, in some respects, had contradicting ideas. The methods of political control used by Imperial Rome and Han China were similar regarding their use of political theologies to justify leadership, their centrally structured government, and their use military power, but exhibited different roles of citizens in government and techniques for maintaining order in the lower class. In Imperial Rome and Han China, the leaders used political theologies to explain and justify their rise to…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In Western Rome and the Han Dynasty, both had increased taxation on the poor and had little to no taxation on the wealthy. In the Han Dynasty the poor would flee and then come back when the tax collectors left. In Western Rome, when Marius came around, he rallied the poor into his army. This caused them to not pay their taxes either. Without people pay their taxes, the government had low funds to support the armies against the two empires enemies.…

    • 133 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imperial Rome and Han China left behind many achievements such as expansion, political structure, and social arrangements.…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rome and Han China at their peaks were the largest and most successful empires the world had yet seen. While Rome centered around the Mediterranean Sea in Europe- from the Roman city-state in central Italy- Han China was based in most of present day China, with the Han homeland located east in the empire. Although in no close contact of each other- the Roman Empire and Han China being separated by thousands of miles- both of these great civilizations grew to great heights and shared many characteristics. While the declines of the Roman Empire and Han China were very similar, both experiencing a collapsing economy, inefficient government, and invasions by other peoples, the differences in their downfalls lie in the core ideals of the empires and how each issue was handled.…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The times of Imperial Rome and Han China were a time of great empires that impacted the world forever. Being so successful, they inconsequently had similar themes of control, however, they also had their differences. The Romans and the Han had similar methods of political control in that they both shared imperial rule and a concept of gaining favor for a thriving kingdom/government, however, their methods of political control were different in that the Romans maintained a large, strong army while the Han had relatively inferior troops. Though referred to by different names and obtained in different manners, the Roman and the Han had a similar concept of receiving favor from their gods.…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two thousand years ago both the Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty were thriving in Italy and China respectively. These two powerful civilizations had completely opposite religions and Government structures, but yet both were able to function as a thriving societies until. Although the Han Dynasty and Roman Empire were based on two completely different beliefs and Government structures, they both had corrupt Governments by the end of their reigns that lead to a weakened army, and lead to terrible living conditions for their citizens, which ultimately lead to both downfalls. Although the Government systems were complete opposites in China and Rome, but both of their leaders were more interested in themselves than the people.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout their time of rule both empires were imperial and under the rule of one ruler. The Romans had the Principate that called for one ruler controlling the government even though there was a senate. While the Han had rulers whom were deemed god because of what they had done for their people, and country, making both empires imperially centralized and without both aspects they probably would not have strived, and been as great as they are seen in…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Han Dynasty of China from 206 B.C.E-220 C.E. and the Imperial Roman Empire from 31 B.C.E-474 C.E., are two well known classical empires. They both contained many similarities and differences between their imperial administrations. In the Classical Period, the Han Dynasty & Imperial Rome both used their governments to establish a state religion and centralized bureaucracy. However, one major difference was that while the Han was a family dynasty, Rome was a republic. Under the rule of the Han family, and under the rule of Theodosius & Constantine, the Han and Rome established state religions.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many different accounts on the fall of the Qin dynasty. The different accounts are either secondary or primary sources. Some are reliable and others not so trustworthy. There are many aspects that make it easier to decipher which sources are not realistic and which really tell the story of the Qin dynasty. Three documents were given to piece together the fall of the Qin dynasty.…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Warring States Essay

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Although the Qin Dynasty was very short-lived, the imperial system it set down and built upon Legalist foundations helped set the pattern of Chinese institutional development for the next two millennia. Nevertheless, the new Han Dynasty was converted at a very early point to Confucianism. The process began with Emperor Gaozu himself, who although he himself was, and remained, a Legalist, he began filling his Court and government bureaucracy with Confucians who in turn gradually established Confucianism’s supremacy not just within the Han Dynasty but in China and much of East Asia from then…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Mongolian and Roman Empires were both vast and expansive empires. Both societies were able to accomplish tasks that no other empire had previously achieved. Although both empires were extremely successful in very similar ways, there were many differences between the two vast empires. This paper will explore both the similarities and differences between the two sprawling empires. Similarities…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We can also assume that the Han had better control over their people and government, because unlike the Mauryans, China was very centralized. They had one capital and one ruler with absolute power. This makes it so China had very clear direction as it was only one person 's ideas being expressed through government. Mauryans also had a ruler, but he had assigned loyalties to govern smaller areas of India.…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays