"We don’t go for segregation. We go for separation. Separation is when you have your own. You control your own economy; you control your own politics; you control your own society; you control your own everything. You have yours and you control yours; we have ours and we control ours.” - Malcolm X. Truly Plessy v. Ferguson, a Loving v. Virginia, and Brown v. Board of Education were cases the Supreme Court decided to have the "desegregation" statement. Including that the civil rights movement enacted in desegregation, moving towards equality and treating each individual the same as any other. Overall, segregation was later banned in all public places.
Plessy v. Ferguson was a case in which the Supreme Court upheld a law requiring all public places to serve African Americans separate. Including, the Supreme Court also stated Africans be treated with the same equality as others. In that event, the law the Supreme Court made was racial segregation under the doctrine "separate but equal." Later on the Supreme Court made its decision and justice was served. Therefore the Supreme Court has its difficult decision that are made out to then change and become something better for society. …show more content…
Virginia is a case that didn't want interracial marriages occurring, in other words American people couldn't marry African Americans. The Supreme Court decided to make that law, it was charged as felony if a white person married a black person. It's was as if the court harassed the people. Chief Justice Earl Warren written, "The freedom to marry and not to marry a person of another race resides with the individual and cannot be infringed by the state." "Loving v. Virginia." Oyez. Chicago-Kent College of Law at Illinois Tech, n.d. Dec 1, 2015. To clarify it was a judgement the states given to those people who loved somebody another race. Generally speaking, Loving v. Virginia was a case that involved racial marriage, not being aloud to
Plessy v. Ferguson was a case in which the Supreme Court upheld a law requiring all public places to serve African Americans separate. Including, the Supreme Court also stated Africans be treated with the same equality as others. In that event, the law the Supreme Court made was racial segregation under the doctrine "separate but equal." Later on the Supreme Court made its decision and justice was served. Therefore the Supreme Court has its difficult decision that are made out to then change and become something better for society. …show more content…
Virginia is a case that didn't want interracial marriages occurring, in other words American people couldn't marry African Americans. The Supreme Court decided to make that law, it was charged as felony if a white person married a black person. It's was as if the court harassed the people. Chief Justice Earl Warren written, "The freedom to marry and not to marry a person of another race resides with the individual and cannot be infringed by the state." "Loving v. Virginia." Oyez. Chicago-Kent College of Law at Illinois Tech, n.d. Dec 1, 2015. To clarify it was a judgement the states given to those people who loved somebody another race. Generally speaking, Loving v. Virginia was a case that involved racial marriage, not being aloud to