Compare And Contrast New England And The Chesapeake Region

Improved Essays
New England vs. the Chesapeake Region (DBQ)

Settlers arrived to the Chesapeake region only to be greeted by unhealthy lands full of despair and labor. New Englanders, on the other hand, were welcomed by fresh air and clean water. As the years passed, the state of these two lands stabilized a bit with each other, but the people’s way of living in these regions did not. New England and the Chesapeake region developed differently because of the types of people who came to each of these places, the goals settlers had in mind when they came, and their individuality/teamwork.

The Chesapeake region was occupied mainly by single men, while New England had families. The list of emigrants bound for New England is detailed, with the age of the passenger and their relationship with another person on board, with a decent amount of women (Doc. B). However, the list of emigrants bound for Virginia only has the person’s name and age, with less than twenty women on board (Doc. C). As a result, New England became very populous while the Chesapeake had a less than satisfactory population.
…show more content…
John Winthrop addressed the people as “[Yet] we must be knit together in this work as one man. We must entertain each other in brotherly affection; we must be willing to abridge ourselves of our superfluities for the supply of others’ necessities”. Settlers in New England were on relatively good terms with each other, with religion keeping them together. In Virginia things were different. Since the settlers there did not come to the Chesapeake area to start a new life, they did not care much about others around them and worked independently. There were not many people to trust, since everyone was out to make riches. Governor Berkeley and his Council stated “Also at least one third [of the freemen available for defense] are single freemen (whose labor will hardly maintain them) or men much in debt… […] in hopes of bettering their condition by sharing the plunder of the country with them”. The governing body of Virginia did not trust the single, young men that came because they may get swayed by the other enemy countries and betray their own. In conclusion, the settlers may not have been loyal.

The Chesapeake region and New England developed differently because of the different people that gathered in those two lands, the goals they both had, and their unity. The Chesapeake area overall was not a good place to stay because of population issues, poor living conditions,

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    The Chesapeake was full of colonist that had a selfish desire for receiving gold. All the English colonists cared for was finding gold, in order to be more successful financially. Document 5 states, “The worst with their golden promises made…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chesapeake Colonies Dbq

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There were several colonies that came together to form the Chesapeake such as Maryland. Virginia, Pennsylvania as well as New Jersey. The First every colony to come to the New world was in the early 1600’s at Jamestown. There was a little over 100 settlers to reside right on the James River, which was a marshy area that had little fresh water and food supply. Malaria was a big problem for them.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In document B, the Ship’s list of Emigrants Bound for New England, the people are organized by importance. At the top of the list, they have a minister, as well as his family. The fact that they were bringing in their families clearly states that they are not staying here for just a little bit. They are moving here permanently. They people heading to New England also had specific jobs, unlike the list for Virginia, where all of them were working on farms.…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout 1600 and 1700 the Chesapeake and New England colony regions advanced into unique societies. The development of each area was influenced by religion and their use or lack thereof of indentured servants. One main difference in the regions was their difference in geography. The Chesapeake colonies all had the right land to grow tobacco, and they prospered from it. Many of the farmers in Chesapeake, had their own land with indentured servants.…

    • 234 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The new towns had legal chartering by the colonial authorities and land was distributed to healthy minded town fathers or "proprietors. " The New Englanders were not as obsessed with money and profits as the Chesapeake settlers. The Chesapeake region was focused on profits and making money. Some of these settlers went even further to make a profit by picking to plant their tobacco crops before they planted their main food resource, corn.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lastly, another difference between Chesapeake and New England was of their towns, New England had buildings structured like the ones in England, but in the Chesapeake colonies they had large spread out plantations, Chesapeake had a lot less development than New England, it had no development of roads, as water was the primary transportation source in…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Despite the fact that both New England and Chesapeake Regions of North America were both settled by the superpower that was Great Britain, there were a plethora of differences in their foundation that resulted in them developing in completely different ways. Each region had a different point of view as it pertained to both their religion as well as their government. Each region was not only founded for a different reason than the other. Both these regions were founded in completely different areas that also offered different environments for each respective society to develop in. These differences caused the people in each of these regions to experience a drastically different way of life as well as these differences were able to change the…

    • 131 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These differences in development are a result from variances in immigration patterns, settlement patterns, and motives for immigration. Differences in immigration patterns set the basis for the kind of society they would form. For the people bound for Virginia, a majority of immigrants were men, many of which would become indentured servants (Document C). This led to a fragmented society in the Chesapeake region since hardly anyone knew one another so they didn't feel the need to help them. Due to the majority being men, it made it more difficult for the population to rise, especially for the first few years of colonization since disease swept the regions.…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Overall, New England and the Chesapeake Bay areas had many contrasting qualities including their religion, population, and economies. The key reason that these two regions…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The role of women and families in the Chesapeake and the New England settlements was very important. However, there were many similarities like how in both settlements women married at a very young age, and many differences like how in the Chesapeake settlements, male- centered family structure was not as strong as in the New England settlements. Many factors contributed to such divergent gender roles and expectations in each society like the high death rates in the Chesapeake settlements and the very low death rates in the New England settlements. The role of women and families in the Chesapeake was similar to that of the New England settlements. In both the Chesapeake and the New England settlements, women tended to marry…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By the 1700s, the New England and the Chesapeake regions developed into two different colonies due to each colony’s reason for settlement, consisting of religious and economic reasons, their personal beliefs, and their growth in their society. While the settlers of New England immigrated to the Americas to escape religious persecution, the settlers of the Chesapeake region immigrated for more economic reasons—the search of gold. Each colony’s way of life contrasted from one another in the way they lived in their societal systems. The impacts of these differences evolved the colonies uniquely. Documents A and D reveal the religious motivations behind the New England settlers’ settlements.…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Beginning in the early 17th Century, English settlers scattered themselves along the eastern coast forming some of the first clearly defined regions of the United States. While both the New England colonies and the Chesapeake colonies had deep-seated aversion for the natives, they differed in their religious homogeneity and economic policies. The New England colonies were strictly Puritan whereas the Chesapeake colonies followed no universal religion; also, while the New England colonies relied on fishing, shipbuilding, and farming, the Chesapeake colonies relied on their strong tobacco based economy. Although both regions were eventually conquered by the British and forced to merge as one nation, the New England colonies and the Chesapeake…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1630, a group of more than 15,000 puritans landed in Massachusetts to escape persecution and bad economic times, they called this movement the “the Great Migration”. Once landed, the Puritans named the colony Massachusetts Bay. This colony was ruled by John Winthrop, who was an energetic governor/minister, had an authoritative rule, and believed that power was limited to Puritans. The Puritans had conflicts with the Plymouth colony who were Separatists (Pilgrims) because they had a different belief which the Puritans had no tolerance for. The conflicts would have never happened if the Pilgrims didn’t get blown off course and land in Massachusetts instead of Virginia.…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During 1700s America, most colonists lived in rural farming villages on their own property. In the North, there was a focus on family farms whereas in the south, there were many large plantations with less of a focus on the family aspect and a much heavier use of slavery. The middle colonies, like Virginia for example, were sort of a middle ground where these two traditions mixed and new ones were introduced. During this time period, it is fascinating to contrast these regions. Without carefully examining similarities, like the way they are run governmentally, and the differences, like geography, it would be nearly impossible to understand the lives that these colonists led.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Teresa Nguyen Mrs. Pante and Mr. McWaters 10th Grade Honors English and History 18 November 2016 Comparison of the Colonial Regions Before there was America, it was just thirteen colonies divided into three regions under the control of the British government, known as the New England Colonies, the Middle Colonies, and the Southern Colonies. People came to the new colonies to create a new society and economy. Each region had their own lifestyle.…

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays