Compare And Contrast Nazism And Stalin

Improved Essays
1. Nazism/Stalinism

Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin are two leaders who ruled by terror and fear. They were both powerful and dictatorial leaders who ruled powerful nations at the time. Their ideological principles were founded on totalitarianism. In spite of their similarities, what we remember them most for is their differences , seeing as the two systems that they ruled over were poles apart. For instance, Stalin ruled the Soviet Union under the Communism beliefs, while Hitler controlled Germany through the use of Anti-Semitism groups, Racism, and Nazism. While in power, Hitler had strong hatred for Jews and he carried out the Nazi Holocaust, in which thousands of Jews were tortured and killed. In addition, Hitler’s goals were to capture more territories, rule by terror, and exterminate as many Jews as possible. Although Stalin executed people, his goal was to make the Soviet Union more powerful and industrialize the economy. Nevertheless, even as Stalin changed the geopolitical situation in Europe, Hitler’s reign
…show more content…
The Paralysis of the West

The disaster at Munich was as a result of Neville Chamberlain’s naivety. In 1938, Chamberlain met with Adolf Hitler and agreed to hold talks with the French and even convinced the Czechs to stand down. However Chamberlain failed to invite Czechoslovakia at the Munich talks because he was naive to believe Hitler’s assurance that he had no more territorial ambitions in Europe.

The West did not mount a more determined challenge against the Germans in the 1930s because at the time there was the appeasement policy in place and Britain did not want to go into war with the Germany. The Munich Agreement allowed Hitler’s appeasement, whereby he would expand Germany’s territory. The main reason why Britain did not challenge the Germans was because they were avoiding another world war. Every country in the West was trying to build itself from the effects of World War One, as most economies in Europe had been weakened by

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Apush Dbq Research Paper

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Chamberlain knew that in order to win the war with Hitler he needed the people support a hundred percent and he need support from World War I allied countries like United States and Canada. If chamberlain had declare war on Germany in 1938, it would have been devastated because Britain population did not war a second war and it would have no reason for United States and Dominions countries to join Britain and Britain would have been fighting the German alone. According to the press conference, President Roosevelt told reporter that United States would have not support Britain and France in war against over Czechoslovakia (Dyck B, pg.14). As well as Dominions countries were unable to support the war to defend Czechoslovakia. Chamberlain brilliant…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The early-mid 1900’s led to the rise of some of the world’s most notorious and dangerous leaders: Joseph Stalin of the Soviet Union, and Mao Zedong of China. Known for their ruthlessness and radical reform, these two dictators created a long-term legacy of both progress and struggle during their reigns. Stalin’s path to power occurred in Russia within the Soviet Union, serving as the Secretary of the Communist Party and an important assistant to the controlling Lenin. Utilizing his position, he got many of his companions into powerful governmental positions and was able to gain political support until he eventually took over after Lenin’s death in 1924. Mao Zedong, over in China, was a school teacher during the majority of his years prior to the May Fourth Movement.…

    • 1360 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adolf Hitler wanted to create world domination for Germany and wanted to annihilation the Jewish population. From January 30, 1933 to May 8, 1945 there were a total of five to six million Jews that were killed during the Holocaust. From the year 1933 to the year 1945 there is a direct connection with the events of the Holocaust effecting World War Two and the outcome. Hitler’s plan was to annihilate the Jews and to create world domination for Germany. These two events would impact World War Two with the events that brought different countries into the war.…

    • 1553 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When attempting to understand why appeasement was used as a measure to stop war, considering the the ideology of Chamberlain is crucial in terms of understanding the perspective in which he viewed war. Throughout the 1930’s, pacifism had flourished in Britain as almost two and a half million British soldiers had been killed or wounded in the first world war. This act of war, although it happened some 20 years prior, had still been fresh in the minds of the British people. Neville Chamberlain would carry the torch of pacifism ever since he was elected Prime Minister of Britain in 1937. Chamberlain’s pacifist attitude towards war in general was a culmination of living through the war himself and of having a cousin, whom Chamberlain cared for…

    • 1344 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the 1930’s, World War II was something that many countries were desperately trying to avoid. This was a task found as nearly impossible, due to Germany’s fascist leader who craved more and more power. The country’s leaders weren’t sure whether they should use an appeasement, or collective security to deal with him. Also, there were many things that were done to begin this Second World War. The reason why WWI happened is mostly because of Hitler and his violent actions, and the best way to deal with Hitler’s aggression is by using collective security.…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    There are several instances when Germany demonstrated that it could not credibly uphold any commitments. Each example examined relates to the appeasement of Germany by France and Britain. First, when Germany annexed Austria in March of 1938, it broke the Treaty of Versailles as it exposed the rearmament of the German military as well as territorial expansion on the party of Germany. Britain and France did nothing to prevent this annexation and therefore failed to credibly uphold the treaty. This signaled a lack of intent to enforce the treaty or punish Germany – additionally reflecting how the Treaty of Versailles required complicity on the party of Germany to be effective.…

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The French and especially British majorly tried to avoid any potential wars after the tragic result of WW1, therefore French and British appeasement of Germany in the inter-war period is slightly justified. In the inter-war years, military spending was made less of a priority for politicians in Britain due to economic problems, demands for spending on social legislation, and particularly the anti-war movement that was occurring at the time. However, Britain became apprehensive when Chancellor of Germany, Adolf Hitler, became determined to rectify the impact of WW1 on their country and ultimately restore Germany to glory and European dominance. Hitler had already dismissed one of the terms of the Treaty of Versailles by rearming his troops,…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The year of 1938 was a scary time for the majority of European people due to the threat of Nazi Germany. Under the control of Adolf Hitler, Germany was expanding its borders and was gaining power and support of the German people. The League of Nations was created to stop another massive war from happening. Many believed that it was the League’s responsibility to deal with Hitler’s aggressive stance on taking over nations. The problem was that the League could not agree with an action to stop Hitler also they did not see the threat of Hitler because he was just taking over country’s that had a large population of Germans.…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With the aggression of the dictators in Europe the Democratic European leaders wanted to find a solution to the growing problem. Hitler and Mussolini violated the Treaty of Versailles and built up their armies to invade other countries. Italy invaded Ethiopia to start another Italian empire. Germany built up its army, created a new air force, the Luftwaffe, and sent troops into the Rhineland. Japan left the League of Nations and invaded Manchuria.…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    War Guilt Clause

    • 1045 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The “War Guilt Clause” portion of the Versailles Treaty compelled the German nation to accept full responsibility for starting the war. Also, Germany was accountable for all the material damages, they had to pay war reparations of the amount of fifty-six million dollars, their military was limited to a one hundred thousand men, and their previous colonies was divided among the allied powers, prohibition of tanks, and German Air force .The sole purpose of the Treaty of Versailles was to weaken Germany, so that an initiation of a new war could be avoided. However the German nation thought of the terms of the Versailles Treaty of June 28th 1919 to be harsh, unjust and an unfair punishment. Therefore the end of World War I became an antecedent…

    • 1045 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Winston Churchill famously said, "An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last". Appeasement is a policy which concedes to belligerent demands in order to preserve peace. The use of this policy in negotiations with Hitler in the 1930s would be the best example. Neville Chamberlain, the British Prime Minister during this time period, was the primary developer and supporter of this policy. Most British conservatives at the time were in favour of it, alongside contemporary historians such as Andrew Stedman, Nicholson Baker, and the late AJP Taylor.…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Munich Agreement

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Future leaders are afraid to be seen as appeasers. The Iraq War is a great example of the Munich Agreement still being present in our world today. Politicians have been debating over the decades about appeasement from the Cuban Missile Crisis to Vietnam. They accused one another or were fearful of allowing other countries to get away with heinous crimes out of fear of invention and being called an appeaser. One of the most recent occasion of this occurring was with Iraq around the turn of the century.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If Chamberlain took action earlier instead of being frightened, the outcome may have been entirely different. Appeasement was beneficial in some instances, Britain was not prepared for another brutal war so Chamberlain killed time, so that the Britain troops could get prepared. He also misjudged Hitler- he believed that Hitler ‘was a man who could be relied on.’ The appeasement also provided the public, and even some politicians, with the misconceptions that peace was restored when a war was inevitable.…

    • 1797 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fascism In Germany

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages

    As can be imagined, Germans were extremely angry after the government signed The Treaty of Versailles and the Germans felt…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the years 1933-37 Britain’s foreign policy was to appease potential enemies to sustain peace. This policy was particularly emphasised when Hitler became Chancellor in 1933 and began to reverse the Treaty of Versailles. It was also highlighted by Neville Chamberlain becoming Prime Minister in 1937, as he believed strongly in appeasement. This policy can be seen to be weak and ineffective because of the way that the British dealt with the Abyssinian Crisis in 1935 and Hitler’s early moves when he first came to power. However if the context is taken in to account, it may seem understandable that the British would want to avoid war at all costs because of their limited armed forces and strong anti-war feelings amongst the general public.…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays