Compare And Contrast Napoleon Bonaparte And Adolf Hitler

Improved Essays
While both Hitler and Napoleon were interested in world domination, their beliefs, and ideologies of lay on opposite sides of the political spectrum. Adolf Hitler preferred traditional, extreme right-wing values while Napoleon Bonaparte had what were considered “progressive” political values at the time of his reign. As the leader of the Nazi Party of Germany, Hitler articulated for lebensraum- the need for Germany to expand, autarky- the idea that Germany should be self-sufficient, and the need to abolish the Treaty of Versailles. In addition, Hitler believed that a German "Aryan" race was superior, rendering all other races inferior and unequal. Napoleon Bonaparte, on the other hand, did not share the same beliefs regarding races as Hitler.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Adolf Hitler Comparison

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Comparing Two Men in History The two people I have chosen to compare are Adolf Hitler and Genghis Khan because they are both people who did bad things that affect many people, and did things that lead to war, and involved killing a bunch of people, both ended up dead or being killed for what they did. Adolf Hitler was born in Austria on April 20, 1889 and then when he was three years old he and his family had moved to Germany, and from 1933-1945 he was the chancellor and was dictator from 1934-1945 (Adolf Hitler Biography, Bio.com). At the outbreak of World War 1 he actually applied for military service in the German army, and even though he wasn’t on the frontlines he did participate in many battles and had got injured in the battle…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Andrew Jackson and Henry Clay never saw eye to eye, they had different view of every personal and political topic. The one time they were on the same page was regarding the treaty with France. Jackson held strong in his convictions and did not budge in the negotiations with France. Due to the stern demeanor and strong will of Jackson a war with France did not happen and France paid their debt. Jackson also had a dark side to him that most people chose not to mention but was evident in American Lion.…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order to bring fore change peaceful actions are needed. Change is uncomfortable, when you are accustom to certain habits it is painful to break out of. Bull Connor, a police commissar during the civil rights movements pose as the hindering force. Connor is an example of someone who hindered peaceful changes, by civil rights activist. In contrast, Hitler an insane military dictator eradicated actions of nonviolent change.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The early-mid 1900’s led to the rise of some of the world’s most notorious and dangerous leaders: Joseph Stalin of the Soviet Union, and Mao Zedong of China. Known for their ruthlessness and radical reform, these two dictators created a long-term legacy of both progress and struggle during their reigns. Stalin’s path to power occurred in Russia within the Soviet Union, serving as the Secretary of the Communist Party and an important assistant to the controlling Lenin. Utilizing his position, he got many of his companions into powerful governmental positions and was able to gain political support until he eventually took over after Lenin’s death in 1924. Mao Zedong, over in China, was a school teacher during the majority of his years prior to the May Fourth Movement.…

    • 1360 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    At the beginning of the 19th century, the world was changing at a drastic rate. Throughout the world people were being enlightened, they realized they were not being treated the way the should be, and they wanted change. Individuals that rose higher than the common person became leaders, then later icons throughout history. Napoleon Bonaparte and Toussaint Louverture were just two of many leaders. Napoleon Bonaparte and Toussaint Louverture were very similar, yet very different.…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The topic about ethe French Revolution and Napoleon piques my curiosity the most. Although I possess rudimentary knowledge about the French Revolution, I understand many people consider Napoleon Bonaparte to be one of the most controversial and powerful leaders throughout human history. How can anyone deny that Napoleon was a skilled leader? Napolean graduated from military school at age sixteen and became an artillery lieutenant afterwards. His early military and academic success surprises me because he grew up in a rather poor family with seven other siblings (“Napoleon Bonaparte”).…

    • 222 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John F. Kennedy once said, “Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.” During the 1700s, Toussaint L’Ouverture and Napoleon Bonaparte lead violent revolutions that propagated many changes that perpetually impacted the world. Despite the many differences between them, the similarities they shared were salient. Furthermore, both leaders held mass revolts and violent riots, demanded equality among their people, and destroyed their former government. Due to these leaders not being able to peacefully revolt, their only option was to approach it in a violent manner.…

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In my opinion Napoleon was a hero and not a tyrant because of the many modern systems and ideas that are still used today that were instituted by him. Firstly before Napoleon had come into power france had no standard law system, the punishment for lets say theft would vary from province to province and how powerful the person you stole from was. After napoleon had instituted the napoleonic code, france's first standard law system the punishment would not vary and you would get punished more severely simple because the person you stole from was influential. In Fact the napoleonic code is still used by dozens of nations around the world. Things the napoleonic covered where freedom of religion, it specified government jobs were to be given on…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Napoleon Bonaparte was a controversial French military and political leader. He rose to power in a coup d’état near the end of the French Revolution. France was largely ambivalent about Napoleon, but the overwhelming opinion of Napoleon outside of France was negative. Still, even with all bad, Napoleon came to France when they needed him most, amidst all the death and insanity of the French Revolution. Many people took advantage of the French Revolution to gain power, including Jacques Roux, Maximilien Robespierre, Jacques Hebert, and Napoleon.…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He proposed that he could help Germany to become stable again but they had to get rid of anyone who stood in the way of Germany’s advancement. Hitler believed that the Aryans were superior to all people and believed that by ridding Germany of non-Aryans would help to end the struggles they were facing. He believed that Germany had become impure and corrupt due to race mixing and that the Jews were enemies who sought to take over Germany by destroying the nation state and establishing Jew…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He did very little to help secure an allied victory. As pointed out, he made lots of sound and gave both Churchill and Eisenhower a head ache -- as if they didn't have plenty in negotiate with the political mistake of Patton. De Gaulle was little more than a tool. He was used as a reorganize point to get the French to take up arms opposite to the Germans and Petain. Brace up, De Gaulle claim on being the first into Paris.…

    • 107 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For this reason, The Nazi Empire and Germany's victories in Europe, Nazi Empire created glowing images of a new European order based on “equal chances” for all nations and an integrated economic community. This was not Adolf Hitler conception of a European new order. Adolf Hitler saw that that Europe had conquered back Germany with full power and dominating everything. Only the Germans, he once said, “can really organize Europe.” The Nazi Empire stretched across continental Europe from the English Channel in the West to the outskirts of Moscow in the East.…

    • 1591 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On the other hand, Paul Stock’s debate brings about the idea that Napoleon’s actions are not what lead people into believing that he is a hero or a villain, rather, the “interest in Bonaparte is driven by aesthetic and philosophical concerns: especially the question of whether Napoleon is an ordinary man ‘within’ history, or a semi-allegorical personage” (Stock 1). Stock further dwells into talking about how the perception of Napoleon as a hero or a villain was not based “along a political or chronological narrative”, but rather through romanticism through the British. Overall, Stock believes that Napoleon is “indeed ‘captive’ of Romantic imaginations”, which especially shown by Byron, who “calls him ‘Conqueror and Captive of the earth’ (Childe…

    • 1547 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mahatma Gandhi and Osama Bin Laden; two names that can immediately make you feel at ease and then distressed by having them so close in proximity to each other. These names don’t seem to fit together and definitely don’t seem as though they should be together on the same page. Despite their obvious differences, though, they can be seen as alike in some ways. Granted, one was a man who stood up for peace while the other stood up for violence; but both of them were very successful in motivating people to act on behalf of their visions. These two very well known men were able to cause a change in the world, some extremely good and some extremely bad, both with the unfortunate end of their lives at the hand of their opposers.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two of the greatest men in modern history, Otto von Bismarck and Adolf Hitler were determined to transform Germany into a great power. Despite being Prussian, Bismarck was nonetheless driven to unify Germany due to the fear of liberal ideology in a fragmented Germany. In essence, Bismarck was violent and would not stop at anything until his goals were realized with the eventual formation of a German state. Meanwhile, Adolf Hitler, an Austrian, sought to rid the nation of any race that was not “pure,” creating a utopian society based upon his radical ideology. Like Bismarck, Hitler was close-minded and would always go with his instinct, regardless of what was truly in the best interest of the masses.…

    • 1453 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays