Compare And Contrast Montresor And Zaroff

Improved Essays
Zaroff and Montresor In the story “The Most Dangerous Game”, and the other stories based of “The Most Dangerous Game” there are lots of characters but, the two murderers are Montresor and Zaroff they are equally cunning, manipulative, determined and indifferent to human life. Montresor gave no chances for his victim, and Zaroff played with his victims. In the end, Montresor was successful and most likely won't kill again, Zaroff,on the other hand, ultimately failed, and if he had the ability to kill, he probably would take the opportunity and do it. Both Montresor and Zaroff had their own motives to kill. The only …show more content…
When Montresor decided to kill it was planned and his very first time, and he was pretty successful with it. Montresor is not a classic murderer, he has chosen his victim for a specific reason so he is not crazy, just filled with purposeful revenge. What he has done is not normal,but it is easier to understand than Zaroff's. Zaroff is motivated by his desire to be entertained through the sport of hunting humans. Zaroff has grown bored with hunting animals, so he has decided to hunt down humans. It's too bad he does gives them a chance to defend themselves so it’s not too easy for him. In the end is definitely not ok to kill anyone just because you want to get back at them or because you think it's fun. Montresor and Zaroff both assassinate on their own time. Zaroff is malevolent kills whenever he's in the mood to do so, and Montresor did the killing in the moment. Zaroff unfortunately kills for fun he started off as a kid as a big game killing and probably When Zaroff got older things started to progress until he started to sadly killing a lot more. Each time Zaroff kills he gets a rush of excitement and happiness he basically lives to kill others. The sad thing is each person to go on his island has no

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Imagination can open many doors but it can just as easily slam them in your face. Throughout William Shakespeare’s Macbeth, Macbeth is destroyed by his imagination, not his ambition. Macbeth sees daggers and ghosts and makes himself vulnerable all the while committing crimes because his imagination is showing him he can do anything. The thought that no man can hurt him makes him lower his guard and ultimately leads to his death. Although his ambition led him to kill for the first time, his imagination caused him to continue to kill.…

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Zaroff does not even care to know who Rainsford is and already threatens to kill him. Another characteristic both Montresor and Zaroff have in common is their passion for killing. For instance, the plot of The Cask of Amontillado is based on Montresor having a payback over Fortunato, by killing him. As shown in this quote:X “I continued, as usual, to smile in his face, and he did not perceive that my smile now was at the thought of his immolation” (Poe). Montresor is stating that the only way to end his suffering is by taking revenge on Fortunato, consequently killing him.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Zaroff is in desperate need of a new animal to hunt, or else he will become the most dangerous man. Montresor from "The Cask of Amontillado" by Edgar Allen Poe, does not kill out of boredom; he kills out of anger and for revenge. General Zaroff in "The Most Dangerous Game" is more evil than Montresor in "The Cask Of Amontillado" because he kills humans for his pleasure, and kills a large group of people, not just one person.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As similar to the death of Banquo, Macbeth did not perform this brutal act himself but instead hired murderers to kill his targets for him. The cowardliness in Macbeth is palpable in this decision as he has so little to gain for such a horrendous act; he orders this only because the apparitions told him to beware Macduff and therefore Macbeth seeks to spite him. This puts finality on Macbeth’s lack of morality; he can no longer comprehend the value of a human life as he has many ended without a second thought. The pure senselessness of the act coupled with the little understanding Macbeth has of the bond with one’s own children as stated by Macduff, ”He has no children.” (4.3.255), is what adds fuel to Macduff’s burning hatred of Macbeth. This waste of life represents the completed transformation of Macbeth.…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The main moral of both versions is that even the hunted know fear, love, joy, and other human feelings. Perhaps they know it more so than the hunter because only a sick, demented person, deprived of happiness, would kill men simply because he was bored. Yet, in the written version, the hunted somehow turn to become the hunters. Rainsford becomes what he fears; after killing Zaroff, the man who put him through several brutal trials not only for the body, but also for the spirit, the reader can infer that he took over Zaroff’s role in society. Zaroff may have lost his life, but Rainsford lost his soul.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lust serial killers also will not stop killing until they are caught. Thrill serial are a very uncommon type of serial killer because the only motive they have for murdering innocent people is the thrill of killing. Thrill serial killers take their time and torture their victims and enjoy the pain that the victim feels during the process. This type of serial killer also loses interest quickly as soon as their victim is dead and will not dismember or mutilate the victim because they have nothing to gain to further the excitement. Most thrill killers are short lived because they tend to be sloppy in how they kill their victims and leave behind many clues and evidence leading to their downfall.…

    • 2535 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Macbeth had gone so far away from his morals that going back would be as hard as going forward, however the option to turn back was there, but Macbeth continued to kill, only worsening his position. Shakespeare shows us that although Macbeth may seem guilty, he is not guilty enough to stop himself. Through this, he reveals Macbeth’s true nature: a murderer. Though in the beginning Macbeth was a hero of the people, he is no different now then he was then. The only difference is the selfish hand that guides his to kill.…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He could have easily escaped the horrors of the island but instead Rainsford stayed seeking revenge. “He is still a beast at bay,” this statement indicated that Rainsford isn’t finish with the game, he appears to be following primitive instinct of fighting rather than fleeing. Through this act the crown has switched heads, Zaroff is the true victor in the game for he has found an opponent who has matched his wits and another individual who appreciates the thrill of his game. Therefore, by killing Zaroff, Zaroff passes his role to Rainsford, which makes him no better than the murder he has fed to the hounds. The closing line: “he had never slept in a better bed.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People wanted the dog dead because it was to stinky. One day someone suggested to him to kill the dog by shooting in the head so it will be painless. Candy did not like the fact of killing his dog but the pressure was on him to kill it. So, he allowed someone to kill the dog and now regrets allowing something to kill the dog. He said he should have killed his own dog not them (pgs.45-65 steinbeck).…

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In today’s world, many people get involved in activities that make them happy,but for one man, this enterprise not only gives the man pleasure, but ends the life of another human. In the story “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell, General Zaroff, the antagonist, is a cold, heartless man who couldn’t care less about anyone or anything but his hunting and own joy. General Zaroff spent his life hunting and killing, but when the thrill of killing an animal was nowhere to be found, he turned to killing men, and from there General Zaroff became a cold and heartless murderer. “I hunt the scum of the earth-sailors from tramp ships-lascars, blacks, chinese, whites, mongrels…”(Connell 225). General Zaroff has no hate or disliking for any…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays