Compare And Contrast Milgram Experiment And Stanford Prison Experiment

Improved Essays
Humans are social animals. For numerous years they have been evolved to be aware of their environment and act accordingly. The group environment affects the fundamental ways of their thinking. They say unimaginable things and do unthinkable things. Some are good, some are bad, and some are purely evil. The Milgram Experiment and Stanford Prison Experiment (Zimbardo) shows the dark side of human nature and demonstrates that under the social pressure, even a truly rational person can ignore his moral conviction and act evil.

Milgram theorized that people obey to cruel orders not because they are evil but to accommodate the situational pressure. Therefore, under the authority of certain situation even the well-educated and rational people can
…show more content…
The guards worked 8 hours per day, and the prisoner stayed in jail for 24 hours. During the experiment, the prisoners developed a pattern of dependency, and the guards became sadistic and abusive. Prior to the experiment all of them were just typical students, but their new roles and uniforms affected their identity and personality as well. The experiment shows that how the sense of belongings and social roles can affect human behavior. Personality changes brought about by a uniform are often noticeable in police departments. Police brutality is a continuous issue in the US, and it means that police officers who have normal personalities can become aggressive when they wear uniforms.

The above two experiments are the most well spread and accepted experiments about obedience of people to authority. However, some scholars present critical evaluations of them that challenges their relevance to our society. According to Ian Nicholson, the Milgram Experiment was experimented in the US, and its result is affected by the US’s macho culture at the time. He also mentioned squared distrust and skepticism prevalent at the culture as the experiment became popular

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Stanely Milgram was a social phycologist who conducted an experiment in 1963 about nonviolent people being capable of hurting others due to obeying the authority under pressure despite their feeling of remorse. The way the experiment received progression was by having people play the role of a teacher and a learner. The teacher obeys the authority and the learner had to memorize a certain amount of words. If the learner failed to the duty, he would received a punishment of a dose of high voltage shock. Although the purpose of the experiment was to test how the learner was capable of learning, it to was to test the capability of the teacher to continue the experiment whether or not they felt guilt.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Zimbardo’s Stanford Prison Experiment is one known for its many positive and negative outcomes, as well as giving an outline of negative ethical practices when conducting a research using humans. However, the process of constructing such an experiment was originally done with good intentions, not expecting those involved to suffer psychological changes. There were two purposes to inspire the conduction of this study. First, researchers wanted to observe what kind of norms will develop in a psychologically stressful situation. Secondly, to discover the changes in behavior when a group of peers, of similar situations, are given either a position of uncontrolled power or a position of expected submission.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Inspired by the horrific acts committed by thousands of seemingly “normal” individuals during the Holocaust, Stanley Milgram set out to discover the causes and triggers of unquestioning obedience. He inquired why so many people from uneventful backgrounds followed orders from the most tyrannical and prejudice leader ever facing this world. Basing his theory from that of a grade school friend and famous situationist—Philip Zimbardo—Milgram began to explore the possibility of a situation to force a person to act in opposition of their deepest values and morals. His curiosity resulted in the perpetually debated Milgram Obedience Experiments.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dalrymple begins analyzing Stanley Milgram’s experiment and begins to justify what happened in the experiment. The article described that Milgram’s demonstration was individuals that shocked subjects and tormented them simply because they needed to obey to power. Dalrymple expresses that despite the fact that Milgram proved even good people have the capability to…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nazi soldiers clearly had a lot of influence from the charisma, intimidation, and power of the leader of their country, Adolf Hitler. The Milgram experiment emphasizes that Hitler’s high position of respect and power had a huge impact on their willingness to commit such…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In 1971, an experiment took place in Stanford, California. It was named the Stanford Prison Experiment, lasting what was meant to be two weeks, but due to the brutality of the trial, lasted a mere 6 days. Its purpose was to conduct a study on humanity and show just how evil a human can get when given a position of power. To summarize the experiment, a random 18 men were chosen, all innocent, good people who’d never committed a crime. They were divided into two groups erratically: 9 being “prisoners” and 9 being “guards.”…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Stanley Milgram, a Yale University psychologist, shares his results from an experiment he conducted in regards to obedience of authority in 1963 in, “The Perils of Obedience.” His experiment illustrated that when put under particular circumstances, ordinary citizens have the capability to perform terrible and unexpected actions (Milgram 85). Milgram rationalizes these proceedings through the conclusion that the average individual will decide to please the experimenter rather than resist his authority to protect the wellbeing of the learner (Milgram 86). Diana Baumrind, a psychologist who worked at the Institute of Human Development at the University of California, writes in response to Milgram’s experiment “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments…

    • 1334 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marianne Szegedy-Maszak, author of "The Abu Ghraib Prison Scandal: Sources of Sadism," states that everyone is subjected to be a possible torturer (Szegedy-Maszak 76). Szegedy-Maszak asserts, the "unconscionable acts" committed by the Abu Ghraib were likely caused by "the anxiety and helplessness" of their horrific living conditions (Szegedy-Maszak 76). Philip G. Zimbardo, author of "The Stanford Prison Experiment," attempts to clarify the reasoning and motivation behind the sadistic acts in situations similar to the Abu Ghraib Prison Scandal. Zimbardo conducted a study where twenty-one male college students were paid fifteen dollars a day to participate in a, "mock prison," to study the psychological behavior projected from a simulated prison…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stanley Milgram is a well-known psychologist whose revered yet controversial experiments on obedience forge a popular name for him. His experiments offer plenty to critique, and many respected psychologists tore his work apart. One author, Diana Baumrind, critiques Milgram in her article, “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments on Obedience,” and explains the unethicality of his work and the assumed rights of the subjects. Ian Parker on the other hand, in his article “Obedience,” states that while Milgram’s experiments were unethical, they were still significant. Both Parker and Baumrind effectively, although occasionally unfairly, discuss the ethical aspect from different points of view of Milgram’s obedience experiment.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article "The Perils of Obedience” Stanley Milgram describes obedience as a basic element in the structure of social life and the effects it has on all communal living(Milgram 693). What if one is asked to be obedient to something that doesn’t aline with their personal morals? Milgram wanted to run an experiment to find this out. He simply wanted to know if the Nazis were acting out in pure evil or just simply following direct orders by a person who, they thought, was placed in a position of authority. In order to do this, he sets out to test how a normal person reacts when given violent orders by a person, who they believe are in a place of authority.…

    • 2072 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Philip Zimbardo’s TEDTalk “The Psychology of Evil” discusses the line that separates good from evil, and how any human, placed under the right circumstances, can be swayed to either side of that line. Zimbardo begins his talk by discussing the century old question “What makes people go wrong?”. While some people may argue that humans are born either intrinsically good or evil, Zimbardo refutes this claim stating how, as a young boy growing up in the Bronx, he personally witnessed many of his friends cross the line from good to evil. Zimbardo calls this phenomenon the “Lucifer Effect” after the biblical story of the fallen angel Lucifer, once God’s favorite angel who falls from grace to eventually become Satan, epitome of all evil. Zimbardo’s…

    • 1635 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram’s experiment on obedience to authority is one of the best known studies in social psychology. It was repeated several times in different variations. These replications extended our knowledge about the phenomenon of complying to authorities’ orders. One of them was the experiment conducted by Hofling et al. This essay will outline the similarities and differences between these two studies.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Obedience is key to society, especially to a leader of small group of people. When people is obedient it allows thing to proceed forward smoothly without chaos. In some scenario people can take the obedience for granted and make another person do something they wouldn’t do in their own will. The milligram experiment was conducted Stanley milligram in Yale University. The Milgram experiment is focusing on obedience to authority.…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    The test proved that seemingly normal people are likely to follow orders given by a person of authority even to the extent of killing another because obedience to authority is ingrained in us all from the way we are brought up. This experiment forced participant to either violate their conscience by obeying immoral demands or not. Milgram’s experiment recruited forty males to take part in the study of “learning” with a total of six hundred thirty-six participants in eighteen separate tests. The participants actually believed they were shocking a real person unaware that the learner was actually acting like being shocked.…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This experiment went wrong and led to mental problems. These problems became so extreme that the experiment was discontinued after 6 days instead of 2 weeks. The Stanford Prison Experiment called into question the idea of Good vs Evil. The experiment showed how situational journey can cause an individual to “compromise” their beliefs. This change in behavior lead to psychological conflict among the “guards” and “prisoners.”…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays