Compare and Contrast Low Carbohydrate Diets versus Low Fat Diets
The two largest and mainstream methods to lose weight are low carbohydrate diets and the low fat diets. The two are complete opposites of one another when it comes to each diet’s food options, the low carbohydrate diet that completely ignores the food pyramid limits that a person can have eating foods that are high in carbohydrates, such as bread, pasta and rice, while the contrary, the low fat diet which ensues the food pyramid limits a person cans have eating foods that are high in fat like milk, meat, and bean categories. Although both diets may sound completely opposite from one another, they additionally share similarities. Both the low carb diet and the low fat diet allege …show more content…
Since the low fat diet has been around for a long time, countless tests have been studied and it has been proven good for a steady weight loss. On the other hand, according to many organizations such as BUPA, the low carbohydrate diet being fairly new hasn’t been proven based on long studies that it is good for long-term weight loss, “the long-term effects of the diet are still a mystery”. Former participants of the low carbohydrate diets have stated that they experienced fast weight loss but found it hard to sustain their healthy weight. A research has been done at the University of Pennsylvania in the month of July last year which 64 people have been randomly assigned to either the low fat diet or the low carbohydrate diet (Atkins). The low carbohydrate group seemed to have lost the most weight in the first six months but ended up with no difference with the low fat diet after one year (Barrett, sec.2 par. 8). This concludes that …show more content…
The low fat diet follows the food pyramid by suggesting to eat high nutrient foods such as bread and grains, foods that happens to be high in carbohydrates and less of foods that are high on fats and oil like desserts and snack foods. In contrast, low carbohydrate diets allows a dieter to eat foods that are usually thought of as bad, such as snacks and sweets, without any limits and less of foods that contain carbohydrates, for carbohydrates are believed to cause weight gain. It completely breaks the rule of the food pyramid, by lessening carbohydrate intake and increasing meat and fat intake. So, the low carbohydrate diet is in complete opposite in following the food pyramid as suppose to the low fat diet by increasing the consumption of high fat foods and limiting the intake of carbohydrates in the body. The low carbohydrate diet and the low fat diet are only a few of many diets that are offered to the public. Each diet may seem like the total opposite just as in the low fat diet and the low carbohydrate diet. Differences like the selection of food choices and presentation of the ideas are some examples, but in the end the same results are
The two largest and mainstream methods to lose weight are low carbohydrate diets and the low fat diets. The two are complete opposites of one another when it comes to each diet’s food options, the low carbohydrate diet that completely ignores the food pyramid limits that a person can have eating foods that are high in carbohydrates, such as bread, pasta and rice, while the contrary, the low fat diet which ensues the food pyramid limits a person cans have eating foods that are high in fat like milk, meat, and bean categories. Although both diets may sound completely opposite from one another, they additionally share similarities. Both the low carb diet and the low fat diet allege …show more content…
Since the low fat diet has been around for a long time, countless tests have been studied and it has been proven good for a steady weight loss. On the other hand, according to many organizations such as BUPA, the low carbohydrate diet being fairly new hasn’t been proven based on long studies that it is good for long-term weight loss, “the long-term effects of the diet are still a mystery”. Former participants of the low carbohydrate diets have stated that they experienced fast weight loss but found it hard to sustain their healthy weight. A research has been done at the University of Pennsylvania in the month of July last year which 64 people have been randomly assigned to either the low fat diet or the low carbohydrate diet (Atkins). The low carbohydrate group seemed to have lost the most weight in the first six months but ended up with no difference with the low fat diet after one year (Barrett, sec.2 par. 8). This concludes that …show more content…
The low fat diet follows the food pyramid by suggesting to eat high nutrient foods such as bread and grains, foods that happens to be high in carbohydrates and less of foods that are high on fats and oil like desserts and snack foods. In contrast, low carbohydrate diets allows a dieter to eat foods that are usually thought of as bad, such as snacks and sweets, without any limits and less of foods that contain carbohydrates, for carbohydrates are believed to cause weight gain. It completely breaks the rule of the food pyramid, by lessening carbohydrate intake and increasing meat and fat intake. So, the low carbohydrate diet is in complete opposite in following the food pyramid as suppose to the low fat diet by increasing the consumption of high fat foods and limiting the intake of carbohydrates in the body. The low carbohydrate diet and the low fat diet are only a few of many diets that are offered to the public. Each diet may seem like the total opposite just as in the low fat diet and the low carbohydrate diet. Differences like the selection of food choices and presentation of the ideas are some examples, but in the end the same results are