• Home Page
  • Compare And Contrast Louis Xiv And Peter The Great

Compare And Contrast Louis Xiv And Peter The Great

Improved Essays
Show More
Register to read the introduction… Peter the Great used the Table of Ranks which placed superiority to those who were endowed and served in the military – not by birthright – with the highest civil rank being a chancellor. This improved Peter the Great’s control over how much power certain nobles had because they could not skip ranks and need to be promoted to advance. Louis XIV used the two main classes Nobles of the Robe and Nobles of the Sword. The Nobles of the Sword were those in the nobility by birthright – their predecessors were of high ranks in the military. The Nobles of the Robe were favored by Louis because they bought their way into nobility and were devoted to the king. Those who were elite were members of the Parlement and could now measure up to the values of the Nobles of the Sword while giving Louis a profit and more control over the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Differences Between Peter The Great And Louis Xiv
    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Differences Between Peter The Great And Louis Xiv

    Peter the Great accomplished many of the goals that he had set forth at the beginning of his rule. Peter the Great built great relationships with with many European and Western countries by visiting them and joining their daily lives in his hope to modernize Russia. Peter the Great also renovated his trade, since the Russians were learning to build better boats and the new capital was “basically” a port since it was located in the swampy marsh. This advancement also helped renovate the Russian culture. He also accomplished his goal of having a great naval fleet. Peter the Great achieved these things because he went to the western countries and studied and learned how they lived and how they built things such as ships he also studied their architecture. He brought all of these western ideas back to Russia with him so that he could begin modernizing Russia, which helps them grow as a higher power country. On the other hand Louis XIV became known as the longest monarchy rule, and he also allowed many new discoveries to happen under his rule. Louis was able to achieve these things because he did not do a ton of things to upset the subjects under his rule, he was able to achieve the new discoveries because he helped fund many of these “explorations and experiments”. Hardly ever do you see a monarch without failures, Peter the Great and Louis XIV both had failures. Louis XIV had…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    King Louis Xvi Research Paper
    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages

    King Louis Xvi Research Paper

    King Louis XVI, born August 23, 1754, was the last King of France and he wasn't a particularly strong leader. Although he’s one of the most famous monarchs in the 18th century who went down in history, he miserably failed at his job. The kings before him, Louis XIV and Louis XV, put the country in debt and the unemployment dropped to 50%. He was a beloved king at the beginning of his reign, but as he made more decisions he slowly became a despised king. His people stormed the Bastille to show a defiance towards him, his family got charged with treason, and he was guillotined by his people on January 21, 1793. Those are only a few things that should prove that he wasn't a very great leader.…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Social Class In A Knight's Tale
    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Social Class In A Knight's Tale

    In medieval England, social status and rank are very important in everyday life. Everybody was in a class and rank depending on that class. You couldn’t change your class, marry outside of your class, and you had specific jobs to do.…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    King Louis XIII: France In The Mid 17th Century
    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages

    King Louis XIII: France In The Mid 17th Century

    France in the mid 17th century was quite hectic. At the time, King Louis XIII was in power and basically running the country into the ground. To start, he was ruling with the help of his closest advisors and Cardinal Richelieu which, in effect, gave some of his power away. Along with that, Louis XIII was in continuous violent religious discords with the Huguenots (Biography.com Editors. "Louis XIII Biography"). When his son Louis XIV was finally born, the boy was not given much of a government or even country to work with. Although Louis XIV was not given much, he seemed to surprise many with what he was able to do with the country of France. Louis’ rule beginning at a young age, building power with Versaille, and making some major decisions…

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Strengthes And Weaknesses Of King Louis XIV, The Sun King
    • 1608 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Strengthes And Weaknesses Of King Louis XIV, The Sun King

    King Louis XIV is very known and recognizable because of his ability to have complete control over France using his strategical policies and tactics. Also King Louis XIV has an amazing 72 year rule. Louis was able to rebuild France 's economy and make it better than it ever was. Louis didn 't even tax the nobility which might have seemed ludicrous but this was smart because this prevented Louis to have revolts and punishments. Louis did this through his power and incorporation of mercantilism. Louis was able to make the exporting a lot cheaper and bring in much revenue through his importing. This made Louis very powerful and soon enough his became the absolute ruler of France. In addition, Louis centrialed France’s government, this was mainly done by the Palace of Versailles which was the central part housed by the French government. Although, this Palace was highly expensive it made Louis a stronger and definitely a more powerful ruler. This house gave Louis the power to make the nobles his servants. The nobles even had to survive through his generosity, this gave much power to Louis. Lastly, Louis increased the military 's France by tenfold. This was done by Louis having skilled men from the street and having a lottery to bring people in and join. In 1635 France’s military was at 25,000 by 1959 it went up to 250,000. King Louis XIV was the best absolute ruler throughout history because of his ability to gain absolute control over France by using his strategic and skillful policies. King Louis XIV had many strengths and few weaknesses this is why he is not only a great leader but the best absolute…

    • 1608 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Compare And Contrast Malcolm X And Patrick Henry
    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Malcolm X And Patrick Henry

    Freedom is a universal right that has been given to all people and the fight for freedom has been expressed by many in many different ways. One of the notable people that have expressed their want for freedom would be the Patrick Henry, speech “ Speech to the Virginia Convention” and Malcolm X “The Ballot or the Bullet” speech. Patrick Henry and Malcolm X are were two very different. Which both show examples of what want and fight for freedom in similar and different ways.…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Louis XIV: The Sun King
    • 1561 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Louis XIV: The Sun King

    Louis XIV, also known as the Sun King, is one of the most famous French kings because of the long lasting effects of his policies. Born on September 5, 1638, he reigned for 72 years and achieved his goal of creating an absolute monarchy. In order to do so, Louis reorganized France’s political system, enforced the worship of one religion, and created a central seat for power, which became Versailles. He was known as the “Sun King” because of the splendor of his court at Versailles. Today, he is most remembered for Versailles (which is visited by millions of tourists every year). Louis XIV identified himself directly with the governing of the nation. One of his most famous statements…

    • 1561 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    How Did The French Revolution Dbq
    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How Did The French Revolution Dbq

    France generated a hierarchy that included three separated divisions, these were known as estates. There was the clergy as the first estate, nobility as the second estate and bourgeoisie as the third estate. In addition “the third estate is the people and the people is the foundation of the state, nobles and clergy are…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Ivan The Terrible Vs. Peter The Great
    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Ivan The Terrible Vs. Peter The Great

    Ivan the Terrible ruled with extreme violence, whereas Peter the Great had more of a purpose for Russia with his violence. Granted, both Ivan and Peter killed many of their own people, but this is only one of the few similarities between the two. Both Russian rulers were raised under severe conditions. They were abused as children but as adults they gained absolute power.…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Dbq Louis Xvi
    • 85 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Dbq Louis Xvi

    In the early years of his reign, Louis XVI focused on religious uniformity and foreign policy. On the homefront, he invoked an edict that granted French non-Catholics legal status and the right to openly practice their faith. Louis XVI's early foreign policy success was supporting the American colonies' fight for independence from France's archenemy Great Britain. However, the policy of taking out international loans and not raising taxes increased the debt and drove the country to near bankruptcy by the mid-1780s. This forced the king…

    • 85 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Ivan IV And Peter I: Impact On Russian History
    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Ivan IV And Peter I: Impact On Russian History

    People have had a vast impact throughout history. People, especially Tsars have had a powerful effect on Russian history. Specifically, Ivan IV and Peter I have made significant impacts on Russian History.…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Compare And Contrast Peter The Great And Louis Xiv
    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Peter The Great And Louis Xiv

    They both desired to limit their nobilities powers. Louis hated his nobility and tried to keep them out of his government. He required them to live at Versailles for part of the year so he could keep them distracted while he took on his affairs. He was able to collect taxes without the consent of the French Estates general, which was unheard of by any other ruler. Louis’s political structure was centralized absolutism, so he could handpick his desired ministers and limit the power of the nobility. Nonetheless, Peter the Great took a different route. In order to pacify the nobility he gave them jobs in the military and civil offices. His ranking system allowed non-nobles a chance to become nobility. Peter the Great took the initiative to do what he had to in order to continue ruling without the nobility’s interferences. He centralized Russia by creating 50 provinces and this reform created a social balance since it ensured that everyone was under the same central law. He politically and economically influenced his country by secularizing schools, creating a strong navy, reorganizing his army according to Western standards, and gaining greater control of the Orthodox Church. In order to develop Russia’s economy, he imposed taxes of Russian serfs to increase the revenue of the monarchy. Increasing revenue helped create a centralized bureaucracy. Peter saw the flaws in Russia and reformed in into a great…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Characteristics Of Machiavelli And King Louis XIV
    • 1107 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Characteristics Of Machiavelli And King Louis XIV

    Ultimately, his absolute power, the fact that he enforced the lettre de cachet, and his persecution of the Huguenots instilled fear in his subject. Additionally, he robbed the nobles of most their power when he drove them into debt by forcing them to buy expensive attire and when he gave them virtually invaluable positions in government. By lessening the influence of the nobles, he also proved that he was cautious that they might conspire against him. Also, Louis was frequently trying to weaken opposing countries; thus, he proved he was fearful of foreign powers, too. All in all, these three qualities that King Louis XIV possessed helped to make the king one of the most influential leaders of all time and also validated Machiavelli’s advice, as the ruler was the longest ruling monarch in European…

    • 1107 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Compare And Contrast Edgar Allan Poe And King
    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Edgar Allan Poe And King

    Stephen King and Edgar Allan Poe are two of the biggest authors in the horror genre reason being, Poe and King had a big influence in literature because of their writing styles and technique. Such as, Poe’s influence on King in his younger years, Poe being a part of the romanticism era, and king’s use of description. In addition, despite King and Poe growing up in different era’s their upbringing, writing styles and, impact in the horror community are almost similar to one another. Ultimately, Poe and King are two influential authors who both similar yet different at the same time because of their lifestyles, writing styles and, influences in horror.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    The Rise Of The Middle Class In Chaucer's The Canterbury Tales
    • 2356 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The Rise Of The Middle Class In Chaucer's The Canterbury Tales

    England was a difficult place to live in the medieval times if one was not born into a noble family. If one was not considered to be a noble from birth, then that person would likely have little to nothing for their entire life. The only real way that a person could improve their position would be to become a part of the church or perform a great feat that would cause a king to crown them as a noble. This was because there were only three real classes in England in the medieval times: the nobility, the clergy, and the peasants. The nobility consisted of kings and other people that were rich, had a lot of land, or held important positions in the government. This class also included knights that fought for their lords. The clergy consisted of…

    • 2356 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2023 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings