Introduction
Totalitarian states and Liberal Democratic states has played a role in the political world hence There’s been a debate between the Totalitarian state and the Liberal Democratic state a debate between the two regimes about which does what and how do they differ. My main goal is for me to elaborate the importance of these two regimes and to also give a better understanding and relevant information from my sources .I, myself as the researcher will use the internet to find the information needed to complete my project .I’m hoping that In my research project-the information presented will help to see what issues took place or are still taking place and what measures were to be taken in both the past and present .A conclusion on the …show more content…
The early fascist program was a mixture of left and right-wing ideas that emphasized intense nationalism, productivism, anti-socialism and the need for a strong leader
Advantages and disadvantages of Totalitarian state
The totalitarian has the leadership or that state has the power to corrupt and manipulate those around them because not everyone is able to see what’s going on when not in public. The state or the leader or the political party is able to make decisions or change them anytime but it’s not always good in the totalitarian state because not everyone will be able to trust you and when something goes bad you as that leader will be the one who takes the blame, some people or leaders wants to be leaders for the wrong reasons but still no one will know the motives of the person
Liberal …show more content…
It is also known as the western democracy. It is the type of indirect democracy operated in the United Kingdom. Liberal Democracy has a variety of features; firstly, it encourages political, social and economic competition between the political parties and pressure groups. The government gets its legitimacy from the people through elections in which most adults can vote with good choice of candidates and a secret ballot that the government should be accountable to the people for what it does. There should be a free press, free speech in most countries a written bill of rights that priories the rights of the individual. The main aim, goal or objective of Liberal democracy as a system is that it tries to limit the power of the main branches of government over their individual. Liberal democracy is the type of leadership or state with a democratic type of mind set because they allow our people to voice their opinions and exercise their rights. Being a liberal democratic leader allows people to respect you, trust you, and give you all the support needed because it’s all about how you carry yourself and how you interact, how you act and speak. One of the disadvantages of being a liberal democratic state is that everyone starts to depend on you, meaning it’s not always pleasant being a leader because of all the pressure from those around
Totalitarian states and Liberal Democratic states has played a role in the political world hence There’s been a debate between the Totalitarian state and the Liberal Democratic state a debate between the two regimes about which does what and how do they differ. My main goal is for me to elaborate the importance of these two regimes and to also give a better understanding and relevant information from my sources .I, myself as the researcher will use the internet to find the information needed to complete my project .I’m hoping that In my research project-the information presented will help to see what issues took place or are still taking place and what measures were to be taken in both the past and present .A conclusion on the …show more content…
The early fascist program was a mixture of left and right-wing ideas that emphasized intense nationalism, productivism, anti-socialism and the need for a strong leader
Advantages and disadvantages of Totalitarian state
The totalitarian has the leadership or that state has the power to corrupt and manipulate those around them because not everyone is able to see what’s going on when not in public. The state or the leader or the political party is able to make decisions or change them anytime but it’s not always good in the totalitarian state because not everyone will be able to trust you and when something goes bad you as that leader will be the one who takes the blame, some people or leaders wants to be leaders for the wrong reasons but still no one will know the motives of the person
Liberal …show more content…
It is also known as the western democracy. It is the type of indirect democracy operated in the United Kingdom. Liberal Democracy has a variety of features; firstly, it encourages political, social and economic competition between the political parties and pressure groups. The government gets its legitimacy from the people through elections in which most adults can vote with good choice of candidates and a secret ballot that the government should be accountable to the people for what it does. There should be a free press, free speech in most countries a written bill of rights that priories the rights of the individual. The main aim, goal or objective of Liberal democracy as a system is that it tries to limit the power of the main branches of government over their individual. Liberal democracy is the type of leadership or state with a democratic type of mind set because they allow our people to voice their opinions and exercise their rights. Being a liberal democratic leader allows people to respect you, trust you, and give you all the support needed because it’s all about how you carry yourself and how you interact, how you act and speak. One of the disadvantages of being a liberal democratic state is that everyone starts to depend on you, meaning it’s not always pleasant being a leader because of all the pressure from those around