Compare And Contrast Liberalism And Conservatism

Improved Essays
Liberals and conservatives approach every topic or issue with completely different ways of thinking. They are both formed from different assumptions, and philosophies. Modern conservatives and modern liberals are described as center right and center left. While classical liberals with correlations to our views today would be considered far right economically but far left socially. This shift is inevitable and will always occur as society further develops. To better understand the difference between liberalism and conservatism we must define both understanding the key goals and influential factors, and evaluate liberalism and conservatism comparatively through functions of ideology.
Classical Liberalism is a political ideology that stresses
…show more content…
In 1651, Thomas Hobbes wrote the Leviathan explaining that all individuals are created equal, everyone has the right to be free, and you cannot rule another person without their consent. Hobbes would reach the conclusion that for the sake of people’s security they must grant power over themselves to a sovereign ruler. John Locked was another significant figure in the revision of liberalism. In his book Second Treatise of Government he would defend society 's right to overthrow any government that was no longer legitimate. Locke explains that as population grows we need government to protect us from infringing on other 's rights. As long as the government is fulfilling this role they will remain legitimate. When government infringes on these rights they become no longer legitimate and the people have the right to create a new government. Locke inspired and provoked many revolutionaries through expression of the rights of man and citizens in the American Declaration of Independence (1776) and French Declaration of the Rights of Man and of Citizens (1789). In the Second Treatise of Government John Locke states: “To understand political power right, and …show more content…
A political ideology is “a set of personal beliefs outlining what one has determined to be the optimal mode of social organization.” A political ideology is normative: it is how things should be. This ideology proposes the world on how it should be not how it currently is. A statist ideology presupposes the existence of a government or state. This ideology explains how things should change to make government better. Classical liberalist such as John Stuart Mill explained that the government should attempt to help the welfare of its people. Mill saw the problem with government and realized the change he wanted to see. Mill explain that because government is now responsible for people, the majority of society could use government to deny liberty to the minority or those who opposing views. This is a beneficial ideology to society because it will promote welfare to help people overcome obstacles. It is human nature to naturally be evil and we must have government to maintain and regulate society, in order to prevent citizens from trumping others rights. Ideologies is a “prescription for society based on personal values.” A truly objective political ideology is almost impossible, but if it can be sensitive to the individual and best promotes their cooperation towards mutual ends. Ronald Reagan was a modern conservative who proposed many changes to how he thought

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    John Locke redefined the nature of government and how it should be run. Locke’s ideas helped our Founding Fathers create a system called, democracy. In Locke’s, “The Second Treatise of Government,” that was published in 1689, he says that, “Because men consent to enter into society to preserve their natural rights to life, liberty, and property, whenever the government endeavors to take away or destroy the life, liberty, or property of the people, the government puts itself in a state of war with the people…” In this quote he is saying that, the government gains authority though the support of its people. The duty of the government is to protect its people and their natural rights. If the government fails to protect these rights, the people have the right to overthrow the government.…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This paper will examine the purpose of the state by looking at two-political thinkers John Locke and Karl Marx. The ideas of Locke’s theories are about the “good of the government” meaning that people need a government to rule over them and enforce laws that will be followed by everyone. However, this concept was not shared by Marx as he was aware of the injustice of the government, which is to only protect the (bourgeoisie) who are the capitalist and oppress the (proletarians) who are the working class. John Locke, wrote the state of nature in the book second Treatise on Civil Government (1680), during the British civil war. Locke was a firm believer of Christianity (Locke,1680, sec 6) and he believed all mankind are born equal regardless…

    • 1685 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Locke vouches for thinkers of liberty with individual example cases like Thomas Jefferson and Algernon Sidney. According to the undistinguished Oxford scholar, a designated body instills the political power, which is, the natural power bestowed top every man. In this view, communities or societies surrender their inherent power to a ruling body that is the government. As a result, the government bears the responsibility to protect these said rights at any given time (Aaron, 2011). Consequently, Locke states that any government that violates the compact of these protection rights should be eliminated without fail.…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Liberalism argues for human rights, parliamentary democracy, and free trade, while also maintaining that all such goals begin within the state. Liberalists want to focus more on the individual’s liberty, while realists will sacrifice an individual’s liberty for the stability of the community. Most time liberalists…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The differences between the use of freedom or no freedom depends what is more important, safety or living an enlightened life. The limitations the government put on its people needs to be balanced properly from security to ensuring the rights of its citizens. Hobbes’ natural laws provide a tough punishment system while Kant may find a tough punishment is to take away someone’s freedom. Human nature is a strong power in everyone and is always a threat to the rest of society. Kant’s ‘what is enlightenment’ and Hobbes’ rational view on the right to live offer a large spectrum of how social view change in society.…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marx, for example, believed that the best way to re-balance society was through the ballot box. That is, until a government denies the people the political expression they are entitled to through modern democracy, this includes free speech, free assembly, and freedom of the press. It is then the job of the people to demand change through nonviolent revolution. For this to work, there needs to be enough anger, and enough people who are willing to stand up for change. To draw from Zizek’s work, these movements are like “rage banks”, and the people need to invest enough “rage capital” in order for it to succeed.…

    • 1777 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James Madison’s main argument is that factions are a problem in a well governed society, and that that a good republic should prevent the tyranny of the majority, and protect the rights of the minorities. The constitution of The United States, and The Federalist Papers both outline how a proper republic should be established, with strategies to limit the impact of factions, and create majority and minority rights. Michael Parenti wrote “The Constitution as an Elitist Document”, in which he argues against some of the points made in the Constitution and in the Federalist Papers. John Roche writes “The Founding Fathers: A Reform Caucus in Action”, he argues overwhelmingly in favor of Madison. In Federalist Paper #10, Madison argues that the most important factor in the union is to control factions.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He wanted to show the importance of supply and demand and how it was important to profit. The government Smith would be most accustomed to is John Locke’s ideal government. Locke had a supply, the natural rights of the people, and a demand, the government that all of the citizens accepted. The profit that comes from that supply and demand is the striving society. Locke believed that the government should be in the favor of the people, and according the Smith, the government should stay away from business affairs, which is in the favor of the people.…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    One one hand, Hobbes discussed the necessity for a structure of government where an ultimate power would counteract the intrinsic selfishness of humans. Whereas, Montesquieu championed the idea of civic virtue arising from a society dedicated to liberty. Regardless of the specific nature of corruption, political corruption is a tiered concept because it does not end at the individual. Therefore, it is critical that the compounding effect of corruption should be curbed as as soon as possible. Wallis observed that “once independent, Americans worried continuously about their governments and how to design their political institutions to limit corruption” (Wallis 24).…

    • 1420 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These natural laws may seem contradictory when used as a means to support justified warfare, how can the right to life be taken away? The reasoning comes from the idea that some claims to power are unjust and that men have the right and obligation to protect there and others rights. When someone rules for self interest, ignores societies will, and threatens the freedom of people then he is no longer acting as a just ruler. The government should be made and should act as an extension of the populace and its goals, and similarly people should have a role…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays