Compare And Contrast Liberal Democracy And American Democracy

Improved Essays
In this essay, one will discuss, compare and contrast two liberal democracies. The two countries in question will be the United States of America and the Republic of South Africa. One will note that the United States is a more established liberal democracy while South Africa's democracy is a young liberal democracy. This essay will explain what liberal democracy is and there are critical things that this essay will compare between these two democracies. Amongst them will be their constitution, bill of rights, and separation of powers. Thus, the similarities and differences will be illustrated and then the conclusion will be made.

According to Macpherson, (1977) liberal democracy is a political philosophy and a system of government in which democracy operates in a representative manner in the values of liberalism. Macpherson, (1977) mentions that this democracy is characterised by unbiased, open, and competitive elections between diverse political parties. According to him, liberal democracy is also charecterised by the separation of powers that different arms of government are allocated. Macpherson, (1977) further mentions that liberal democracy is guided by law which is the part of the public, it has equal protection of human rights, political freedom and civil liberties. However, liberal
…show more content…
According to Goldstone, (1997) the constitution mentions that Bill of Rights is a foundation of democracy in South Africa. He says that the bill of rights affirms the rights of the public and also demonstrate the democratic values of human dignity, freedom and equality. It therefore, binds on the government. (Goldstone, 1997) mentions that Section 8 provides that the bill binds the executive, the judiciary and all organs of state. “South Africa belongs to all who live in it, united or in our diversity” (Mbeki,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Ideology Of Liberalism

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Liberalism involves a belief in the need for legislative bodies which represent the influential groups. Liberalism stays concerned with allowing a maximum of freedom for the individual within the context of a system of laws which limit interference with individual rights by government or by other individuals. Hence the liberal ideology also invariably involves a bill of rights to define the rights of individuals and to limit the power of government to interfere with those rights.…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When applying liberal ideas to the international system today, we find two responses to the problems and possibilities posed by globalization. The first response is that of the liberalism of privilege. Which says the problems of globalization need to be addressed by a combination of strong democratic states, robust regimes, and open markets. The strategy of preserving and extending liberal institutions is open to several criticisms, which will be gathered upon radical liberalism, which sees liberalism as benefiting only a few states and individuals. Radical liberals say that there is a massive democratic deficit at the global level; they are not subject to view by…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the United States, liberals are alluded to as the left or left-wing and preservationists are alluded to as the right or conservative. On the U.s. political guide, blue speaks to the Democratic Party which by and large maintains liberal standards and red speaks to the Republican party. (Lyndon, 2005). Conservative is the furthest ideology from my beliefs, they are completely different. In the article Who We Are, the American Conservative states, “A people only begins to discover conservatism when it becomes aware of something it has lost.…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Doyle examines Schumpeter’s explanation for liberal pacifism, which states that the foundation of pacifism comes from the interaction of capitalism and democracy. Schumpeter makes an argument concerning the effects of liberal institutions and principles; and defines imperialism as the object-less disposition within a state to expand forces with no assigned limits (Doyle, 1152). Therefore, the only ones who gain anything from wars are the profiteers and military aristocrats. Doyle disagrees with Schumpeter, and argues that Schumpeter’s explanations are assumptions of materialistic monism, presumptions of ruling, and the view of world politics as homogenized (Doyle, 1154). Doyle analyzes Machiavelli’s view on liberal imperialism, which states that republics represent the best form of state for imperial expansion.…

    • 1730 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There should be a free press, free speech in most countries a written bill of rights that priories the rights of the individual. The main aim, goal or objective of Liberal democracy as a system is that it tries to limit the power of the main branches of government over their individual. Liberal democracy is the type of leadership or state with a democratic type of mind set because they allow our people to voice their opinions and exercise their rights. Being a liberal democratic leader allows people to respect you, trust you, and give you all the support needed because it’s all about how you carry yourself and how you interact, how you act and speak. One of the disadvantages of being a liberal democratic state is that everyone starts to depend on you, meaning it’s not always pleasant being a leader because of all the pressure from those around…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The similarities of federalism and parliamentary sovereignty in the U.S. and Britain are founded on the power of the legislative body to the representational and territorial facts of democratic institutions. More so, the ability of the U.S. federal government as a “checks and balances” system provides a similar use of parliamentary power in the Congress. However, the U.S. relies more heavily on a tri-parte system of legislative government, which allows a certain concentration of war powers through presidentialism. These factors define the overarching power of the American presidency, which makes the president and the Congress accountable for their actions. In a contrasting way, the British parliament does not allow the same powers to the Prime Minister or The Queen as means of accountability in the governing process.…

    • 1343 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    American liberalism is associated with the democratic party (Left). It is a mixture between some of the classical liberalism ideas and the traditional conservatism ideas. American Liberalism is based on equality of opportunity and minimal government intervention in people’s lives. It calls for representative government, protection of individual freedom, civil liberties and justice for…

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The majority of liberals believed in a democratic system of government, while the non-liberals prefer a stronger rule. Next, because Republicanism has different meanings in certain contexts, I will clarify how I intend to use it. In the Latin American context, Republicanism is the ideology of governing a society or state as a republic (la. res publica), where the head of state is a representative of the people who hold popular sovereignty rather than the people being subjects of the head of state. Simón Bolívar is the founding father of Republicanism in South America, and it is his political ideology that shaped its political mentality.…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    How classic and modern liberalism differ in their understanding of human nature and their understanding of how social and political life should be organized? Liberalism is defined as the political identify and whose main goal is to strengthen and guard the freedom of an individual. Liberalism is a belief in the support of the supreme importance of the human individual. John Locke is known as the father of liberalism. Liberal values can be traced back to as early as ancient times of Rome and Greece but, in sixteenth century, massive social changes came and due to these changes, liberal values and thoughts were evolved.…

    • 1520 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe that these two justices’ jurisprudence, or philosophy of law, is shaped by their political ideologies. This is not to say, however, that I believe that the two justices’ political ideologies affect their ability to come to objective decisions since ultimately, their most important task is to remain impartial. The two SCOTUS justices are on the opposite ends of the ideological spectrum. In addition to their opposite ideologies, the pair has two completely different philosophies of law and therefore, vary in their methods of interpretation. Justice Breyer’s political alignment is more towards the liberal side of the court.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays