Karl Marx And Weber Analysis

Improved Essays
Karl Marx and Max weber are two of the many great theorists in the history of sociology, economy as well as philosophy. A focus on at least four theoretical aspects concerning their different and similar approach to the analysis of class in the modern society is the sole base of this essay. Illustrative examples are used to substantiate our answer. Karl Marx and Max weber both analysed similar ideas or concepts in the 19th century but came to different conclusions. \\

Karl Marx (1818-1883) was born in a period where he witnessed some drastic changes such as the industrial revolution. The European revolution through the change from a feudalistic organisation to capitalistic societies. As being part of those societies his thoughts were highly
…show more content…
The economy was for him the base structure or the sole reason of why that society was the way it was.\\
On the opposite side we see Max Weber (1864-1920) being influenced by Immanuel Kant, from whom he learnt to comprehend human sciences looking at the historical contexts as opposed to the free will possessed by the people involved. He was mostly influenced by ‘The German Model’ as well throughout his works.\\
Marx and Weber disagreed on the meaning of social class in modern society although they both acknowledged that people did not operate as individuals only in society.
For Marx, social class is determined by the relationship between the people and the means of production. For him human beings were firstly constrained to produce basic materials to satisfy their needs before anything else. The society’s economy therefore became the central focus or the base of his theory. The government, the work, the law, the politics, the religion, the education and the art (superstructure) of a society were all controlled by the societal economy, said
…show more content…
With such influence on the economy by the bourgeoisie, Marx introduced the concept of exploitation. The proletariat suffered what Marx called a false consciousness where they believe that working harder could change their situations; it has to be noted that by exploitation we see the bourgeoisie making profits at the expenses of the proletariat’s work. This led to what Marx named a class struggle, this clear demarcation between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. If the proletariat could develop a class consciousness where they will stand as a group realising their own misery and alienation; and understand that they could take over the means of production like the bourgeoisie we could see a revolution through socialism and the concepts of class conflicts could be abolished.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Marx believed that the process of production and the distribution of the means of life is necessary to be examined to analyze a society and its problems. Marx further related these means of production to class struggle and labor power. Furthermore, Marx believes that the Bourgeoisie class possesses all the means of production and exploits the Proletariat class by making use of the working class labor for their own profits and thus, make their private property. Therefore, Marx proposed the idea of “Communism” under which he depicts this class struggle within the society and promotes the idea of no private property, meaning where all the property is publically owned and everyone works and gets what they deserve on the basis of their ability and needs rather than acquiring it inherently. Furthermore, he was strictly against capitalism and believes it to be inherently unstable. This idea of Marx is based on the fact that the bourgeoisie has transformed various professions such as “the physician, the lawyer, the priest, the poet, the man of science, into its paid wage labourers” (Communist Manifesto 16). Furthermore, according to Marx, with the free market the bourgeoisie class takes all the profits of the capital and pay these laborers with the minimum wages which cease them from further increasing their conditions and thus, their labor is not serving them…

    • 1694 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    German sociologist, Max Weber (1864) proposed, a three component theory on stratification of power. He suggests we all are all unequal in these three powers and our individual positions with regards to the them provide us with different life chances. 1) Class, individuals with a similar amount of property and skills. 2)Status, individuals who share common lifestyle and consumption patterns. 3) Party, legal organisations that allow members gain advantages by having membership. Philosopher Karl Marx (1818), proposed relations of production, caused the division of classes. The two classes Marx identifies are the Bourgeoisie owners of means of production and the Proletariat, who do not have this advantage, consequently, they sell their labour to the Bourgeoisie who exploit them. Marx argues “The mode of production of material life conditions the social, political and intellectual life process in general” (Anthony, 2013)…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx and Weber had different definitions for social class. Marx’s proposed that social class had a two class system, this system was split up amongst the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. Marx believed that social class in contemporary societies was determined by the means of ownership. The bourgeoisie owned the means of production, such as factories, farms, coal mines etc. The proletariat were classified as manual workers who worked for the bourgeoisie. Marx suggested that the ownership of productive property, or lack thereof, led to the economic, political, and social roles an individual possessed. According to Marx, class represented economic status, the bourgeoisie could be classified as the upper class and the proletariat could be classified…

    • 1820 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mccarthyism Vs Marxism

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the Communist Manifesto Marx explained the historical class struggles that each society has come across since the beginning of time. Class resemblances are usually, the oppressor and the oppressed on opposite sides and classes with various orders of complicated arrangements (p.15). Marx’s believed that his society has not left the class antagonism from earlier times such as the Ancient Roman’s, however, enforced new classes with new conditions and struggles for the oppressed individuals, in place of the old policies (p.15). In Communist Manifesto Marx noted the two classes of his society were the bourgeoisie and proletariats (p.16). Quite simply, the bourgeoisie were the capitalists who were the enforcers and owners of the properties in…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This document highlights the struggle between the capitalist and the working class. Marx believed that society is made up of two classes the bourgeoisie, those who own the means of production, and the proletariat, the mass of workers who do not own the means of production.…

    • 1996 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx said there were two classes of people in the world. The first was the ruling class or as he called them the bourgeoisie [bo͝orZHwäˈzē]. The second was the workers of the world which he called the proletariat [prōləˈterēət] (Kishlansky, 2009). During his lifetime he saw that the bourgeoisie had set up a system were the proletariat were set in a system of wage slavery. As he put it, they were paid a minimum wage for their labor that only gave them enough capital to cover the bare minimum of existence. That included food, rent, and a few other meager items. They could never earn enough capital to own the means of production of their own labor or even their own home. Ownership was something that only the bourgeoisie had the…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx focuses on the capitalist system. He deduced that classes existed, there were inequalities in these classes and the lower classes worked to serve the upper class thereby causing conflict. The upper capitalist class controls manufacturing and resources. The lower class, by comparison controls only their ability to sell their labor…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many of the works and theories of the social theorists during the 19th and early 20th century are still relevant today even with all the changes that we have gone through as a society. The issues discussed in Weber’s and Marx’s class theories; DuBois’ theories about race and Durkheim 's theories on society and labor are the basis on which many of today’s ideologies are derived.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the capitalist system, there are two social classes: the proletariat and the bourgeoisie. The proletariat is the largest social group comprised of poor working class individuals that sell labor in exchange for wages. The bourgeoisie in comparison is a small group made up of wealthy individuals who buy labor from the working class. This is the relationship that has been described previously between the capitalist and the worker. The point of contention amidst the two stems from the unequal distribution of power and…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marxist socialism was designed with the intention of creating a utopia; unfortunately, it turned into one of the greatest political dividing forces the world has seen, but it also encapsulated all the frustration and discrimination the working class suffered through. Marx desired a society with no class or property, and since the working class was the lowest class on the social ladder, this classless society appealed greatly to them. They would be the only class to gain from it, while the other classes would only lose status. Marx viewed class as a natural part of human society, and it was necessary for the level of human development achieved in the Industrial Revolution. The bourgeois had served…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marxism In Fight Club

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Capitalism, according to Marx, is a mode of production based on private ownership of the means of production. It is a system of social relations in which labour-power is commodified and the driving force of society is the accumulation of capital. Marx theorized that economic systems result in two social classes, one of which holds the power and uses it to oppress the other. In capitalism, this is the bourgeoisie, the capitalists, who own the means of production, and the proletariat who’s labour allows the system to function and is the source of the bourgeoisie’s power. As such, the social relations of production are antagonistic. Given this power struggle class conflict is inherent. Marx’s critique of capitalism speculates that the proletariats…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Starting off with the conflict theory by Karl Marx, he was primarily focused on the structures of society. The conflict theory is one of the fundamental ideologies that explains social life as a battle between social groups for power and scarce resources. It tends to explicitly explain social life in the most accurate way possible as it clarifies the inequalities of money, gender, class, and age while displaying how members of privileged groups maintain advantages while subordinate groups struggle. The ruling class known as the bourgeoisie is made up of those who own property and the means of production. The lower class, who Marx called the proletariat consists of those who don’t own property or mans of production. The proletariat are exploited by bourgeoisie to…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Social stratification is everywhere, even in different forms of societies, such as capitalist, communist or mixed. Social stratification can be understood as a system that a society ranks categories of people in hierarchy. A person social class in based on births and achievements in life and an individual position within class structure shows social status. Social stratification is a society that ranks people and Marx and Weber both have different ways of how they view social stratification. This essay will look at both Marx view of social stratification which is bourgeoisie and proletariat and Weber view of social stratification which is class, standë/status, and party/power. In addition, Marx and Weber views of social stratification on present day concerns that affect our lives. Despite bearing some minor similarities, the difference between Marx and Weber are pronounced.…

    • 1667 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Karl Marx explains social inequalities through a society being stratified along economic lines and social class being defined solely on economic position. According to Marx, a person’s economic position is their relationship to means of production, which defines social class. Based on an industrial society, he defined social class by two classes; the capitalist class (Bourgeoisie) and the working class (Proletariat). Marx felt strongly against capitalism and believed that everyone should have a communistic society, which would have no surpluses so only what is needed by the people would be produced. He felt that capitalism was harmful to every person part of the Proletariat, while the Bourgeoisie, the owners of means of production benefited…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “In broad outline Marx 's theory asserts that in the course of making a living and utilizing their technical and industrial equipment the members of society become segregated into classes which carry on different functions in industry and therefore occupy different positions in the social organization. Between these classes there arises an antagonism of interests and a struggle” (Moore).…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays