What Is The Difference Between John Locke And Karl Marx

Great Essays
This paper will examine the purpose of the state by looking at two-political thinkers John Locke and Karl Marx. The ideas of Locke’s theories are about the “good of the government” meaning that people need a government to rule over them and enforce laws that will be followed by everyone. However, this concept was not shared by Marx as he was aware of the injustice of the government, which is to only protect the (bourgeoisie) who are the capitalist and oppress the (proletarians) who are the working class.

John Locke, wrote the state of nature in the book second Treatise on Civil Government (1680), during the British civil war. Locke was a firm believer of Christianity (Locke,1680, sec 6) and he believed all mankind are born equal regardless
…show more content…
As Locke’s idea of over throwing of the government is that it needs to be replaced with the one that will meet the needs of the people example by electing a particular party that will represent them and treat them equal regardless of the capacity and potentiality, “men give up their natural power to the society which enters into and the community put the legislative power into such hands as they think fits with this trust that they shall be governed by declare laws” (Locke, §136). If not then their peace, properties and liberty will be at …show more content…
However, Marx argued that the government is there to protect the bourgeois and oppress the proletarian and power is a tool used to oppression others. Considering both theories, I agree with Locke’s idea of the purpose of the state, people need government to rule them and enforce law that everyone should follow. People need their lives, freedom and properties protected by the state, if there is no government to govern the people, the weak will be oppressed by the strong, and no action will be taken as there is no government and law to protect the people.

Marx’s communist ideology has been put in practise ln countries such as china which is still a govern by communist party. Today China dominates the world economy. However, the working-class are the majority of the population, and their working and living conditions is shocking, the working class are under pad and with little to no rights at work place as well as in state. Today China makes products which are sold world-wide and with cheap labour the western world capitalist are getting wealthy for producing cheap goods t and selling it more than the cost of labour itself. (Weil,2017). This shows that Marx’s communist ideology has failed as the working class are being oppressed even more by their appointed communist

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Classical liberalist such as John Stuart Mill explained that the government should attempt to help the welfare of its people. Mill saw the problem with government and realized the change he wanted to see. Mill explain that because government is now responsible for people, the majority of society could use government to deny liberty to the minority or those who opposing views. This is a beneficial ideology to society because it will promote welfare to help people overcome obstacles. It is human nature to naturally be evil and we must have government to maintain and regulate society, in order to prevent citizens from trumping others rights.…

    • 1738 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He disagreed with the idea of an absolute monarchy, but instead said that limited power was more effective. With that being said, it is society’s right to overthrow the government whenever they have evidence to do so. Locke’s idea of a social contract was very different than Hobbes’. According to Locke, life in the state of nature was filled with “peace, goodwill, mutual assistance, and preservation.” Locke strongly believed that because people were naturally moral, in a social contract, no competition or harm would be an issue. He thought that without a government to defend the people against those wanting to take advantage of them, soon fear would take over.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Mark Alcasid Mr. Ochs World History/Block C 15 December 2014 Essay 1 Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Karl Marx were all philosophes who all essentially wanted the same things for society and government, but had their differences on how to achieve those things. Firstly, Thomas Hobbes, was a man who noticed the natural flaws in humanity. He saw that humans naturally live in a more savage lifestyle. To Hobbes, with order, humans would inevitably destroy each other. The order that Hobbes believes should be enforced to prevent the downfall of humanity is a strong government like an absolute monarchy.…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the Declaration, yes, the people had a right to abolish or change their government. The Declarations creates a soiled argument by first stating that people have certain rights, including life, liberty, and happiness. Next, the government is created to secure these rights for the people. It is all about the people. All of the power that the government has is from the people.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bradley Manning tried to speak up about what the government is doing and was put in jail. The big debate was essentially between Kant and Hobbes’ theories, is there freedom of speaking out and being enlightened, or was it a threat that could put many lives at risk? Hobbes talks about the government being the only one in power and you cannot question it(TOTALITARIAN). If the government begins to break the laws nothing happens to them – there is no punishment. Even though Hobbes says we can vote for who we want to run the country, we need to be able to have a system that can best represent all the people and if the government breaks any laws, they are held accountable.…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Locke believed in a limited, representative government while Rousseau believed in a direct form of government by the people. Locke believed that the powers of the government are to be limited. He believed the government should only exist to protect life, liberty, and property and if the government were to overstep that authority, then the public would have a right to overthrow the government. As I said before, Thomas Jefferson paid homage to these ideals during his drafting of the Declaration of Independence. Along with separation of powers between the House of Commons and House of Lords,2 Locke’s ideals greatly influenced American government where power is vested in a bicameral legislature along with an executive and judicial branch.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Locke vouches for thinkers of liberty with individual example cases like Thomas Jefferson and Algernon Sidney. According to the undistinguished Oxford scholar, a designated body instills the political power, which is, the natural power bestowed top every man. In this view, communities or societies surrender their inherent power to a ruling body that is the government. As a result, the government bears the responsibility to protect these said rights at any given time (Aaron, 2011). Consequently, Locke states that any government that violates the compact of these protection rights should be eliminated without fail.…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Hobbes cared about maximizing liberty, defining social justice, and knowing how to divide the limits of the government power. The process of the state of nature is formed by a community and a government. People would view him as a “Psychological egoist” he was over the top with an unrealistic view of human nature. In the laws of nature and the social contract, “Hobbes thinks the state of nature is something we ought to avoid, at any cost except our own self presentation” (Thomas Hobbes). Hobbes believed in a social contract and how it would help the government rule the society.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When people do this, they are essentially giving up their freedom and liberty, surrendering all control to the monarch. This would give the government the ability to do whatever they felt was necessary. Hobbes sees the government as a way of restraining the naturally selfish natures people possess so that they can live and work together in society. This is quite the opposite view of Locke. Locke promotes more of an optimistic viewpoint arguing that the best form of government is a democracy.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When the power lies fully in the general will there is no true order or direction. I believe people should definitely have a huge say in government and how it affects their life, but I firmly believe that there should be at least one authoritative figure who can make final decisions. Even Rousseau acknowledges that mistakes can come from not having a specific idea of what sovereign authority is (71). There should be someone who makes the final call, if not one individual then a small group of representatives that people vote into office. Rousseau wanted the people to be able to govern themselves because of the negative way he saw the King govern his citizens.…

    • 1580 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays