Compare And Contrast Howie And Laura's World

Do you think that parents let their children be out by themselves? Well in the Goats, Howie and Laura were in danger because they went on journeys together that led them to dangerous people and places. For example, when they were in the lake Laura and Howie got abused by the campers from camp. Laura and Howie confronted dangerous moments, that is why Howie and Laura's world is more dangerous and malevolent, than a more caring, and loving world.
One important reason that Howie and Laura's world is more dangerous and malevolent, than a more caring, and loving world is that In Howie and Laura’s world, there are people that want to harm them and “prank” them. According to the book it mentions evidence that supports my claim, for example, “He was frowning as if he had to do something disagreeable. Don’t said the boy. Murphy pulled down his shorts. The boy curled up tightly, squeezing …show more content…
The supply context is that ”Hot dogs were seventy-five cents. They didn’t have enough for two(40). Another one is, “If we’re going to walk back to camp we need some shoes”(41). The point, is that Laura and Howie were having a difficult time finding resources. Of course, it is possible to disagree with the view that, Howie and Laura are wandering off alone, without adult supervision, and instead argue that they have all of the resources they need in their camps. However, stronger evidence is on the other side. WHat must be remembered is that this counter argument is flawed because in the text it says, how they needed food, a place to sleep in, so they did lack of resources. This is essentially why Howie and Laura are wandering off alone, without adult supervision, which connects to the idea that Howie and Laura's world is more dangerous and malevolent, than a more caring, and loving