John Locke's Responsibility Of Government

Great Essays
John Locke is one of the most influential political philosophers to this day. Among many other topics, Locke continuously wrote about governmental responsibilities to their people. He wrote that people create governments to ensure the stability of order in their lives that would ultimately generate a government that protected what belonged to the people. The government has the responsibility of protecting the people’s rights, and working to preserve the will of the majority.
Before a government type is selected, according to Locke, people live in a state of nature. In the state of nature people are given certain innate rights, like the right to their life, their property, and to the prosperity in their life. In the state of nature every person
…show more content…
Before a government can work to preserve the rights of the people, the people must elect to have a legislative power which will hold supreme power so long as it is given consent by the people. The legislative power is limited to only doing what is good for the people, meaning that it can never possess powers to enslave, destroy, or impoverish its people. With their power the legislative power must elect to establish laws that can’t be varied by your status or your job, universal laws for the state. The burden held for making laws is not only to create new ones, but also to uphold the laws of nature as established by God. After those laws have been established, the legislative power must ensure that the laws made are ultimately for the good of the people. Additionally, Locke held the belief that the legislative power should not raise taxes on property unless they are given consent by the people or the representatives of the people. Locke believed that in the same way the legislative power would remain loyal to the will of the people, and the people had to be loyal to their government and not serve another. Under the surface there is an underlying trust that the people will respect the laws and rulings of their government, and that the government will only work to protect and preserve. Finally, the legislative power cannot place their burden of power in anyone else’s hands so as not to shift power to …show more content…
The people could choose to live in the state of nature, or submit themselves to the possibility of one person rising up in power. The lack of security will always leave the possibility for chaos and unjust behavior to occur. It would not take long for a rational being to decide that having security is the best option available. Although Locke points out that people in the state of nature are rational beings, he emphasizes that the lack of security in the state of nature is the reason people ultimately choose government. He believed that people were innately selfish and would choose incorrectly if given all the power to make punishments. He believed that the power alone would also cause corruption. For people are innately self-interested, and when given the choice to have revenge or provide a just punishment, they will chose the former. This kind of corruption leads very quickly to an almost chaotic way of living. Additionally, as said before the chance that someone might take hold of power and decide they are fit to rule over people is a very plausible possibility. It seems that in every case the state of nature does not last very long before people decide they need more to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Hobbes, John Locke and Karl Marx were three opposing philosophers during the Enlightenment with their own interpretations on government and people. Hobbes believed society needed an absolute monarchy, “to confer all their power and strength upon one man.” Locke said that human nature had natural rights, and were therefore “not to be under the will or legislative authority of man.” Finally, Marx believed in communism, in which belongings are public. All of the philosophies had their own relation to the social contract, which was introduced by Jean Jacques Rousseau.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The nature of man and the state of nature have varied and contrast immensely throughout different societies. Locke, Hobbes, and Rousseau’s ideas about the state of man clash in the form of politics and social contracts. Locke’s view involves the power residing within the people, and the government is there to protect their property, life, and liberty. Hobbes’ ideas are in favor of a monarchy in order to keep the citizens secure and free from harm. Rousseau’s ideas on the politics shares a collective will amongst the population.…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Natural Rights Vs Feminism

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages

    As stated by Locke, “To understand political power aright, and derive it from its original, we must consider what estate all men are naturally in, and this is, a state of perfect freedom to order their actions, and dispose of their possessions and persons as they think fit, within the bounds of the law of Nature, without asking leave or depending upon the will of any other man” (Roots of Wisdom Pg. 365). Consequently, Locke believed that citizen should organize to protect their natural rights, to ensure that these right are not being abused by people of power or the government. As a result, Locke developed a social contract that states that the government and its people had mutual responsibilities in protecting these rights. On the other hand, Locke believed that “living in a state may entail consent to a social contract, but if the state abuses the power entrusted to it by its citizens, they retain the right to rebel” (Roots of Wisdom Pg.…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Most people take for granted many things we are afforded in this day and age. One of those things we take for granted is the government. Without said government there would be no laws to provide order and security, and we would be in a state of nature that would result in a state of war. A state of nature, regardless of who is detailing its differences, is basically a life without government rule leaving people to act out of self-preservation. A place without government is a place of chaos with everyone acting of their own accord.…

    • 2006 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Locke states that the government is obligated to serve people, namely by protecting life, liberty, and property at all cost. In Locke’s eyes the purpose of government is to secure and protect the natural rights and in return the people must obey the laws created by their rulers. This basis of an arrangement is detailed in the American Declaration of Independence as well. The document explains that when and if a government becomes destructive “it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it;” this would be know as Locke’s social contract between the government and its’ people. In this contract Locke details that the citizens of a state would turn over their power to an established government when that said government signs a contract declaring that its’ members will have the common interest in mind.…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Locke an english philosophe says in the Second Treatise on Civil Government, “a state of perfect freedom to order their possessions and to order actions… within bounds of the law of nature… ”(Document A). In other words John Locke argues that people should have freedoms within limits. According to Locke, if the government fails the people, the people have the power to overthrow the government. Freedom was the main idea of Locke’s thoughts about government because, all…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Locke contended that individual freedom was highly important in order to succeed in a suitable government. In “Of the State of Nature” and “Of the Dissolution of Government,” Locke stated that men and women are by nature independent and free, and have the absolute right to take care and maintain this freedom. (Document A). In order to take good care of the government, there would need to be two branches: a legislative and executive branch. Locke argued that a government that had been created by free individuals was more successful to preserve it, versus a monarchy.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John locke is an enlightenment thinker and thought that all people were born with certain rights. Such as a right to life, freedom, and to acquire one’s own property. Certain rights are suppose to keep a society from rebelling against the government. John locke’s idea was that everyone should have a chance to gain their natural rights from the government. John Locke also claimed that if a government was using too much power, the people could rebel against the government and be replaced.…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    MaKenna Jueneman World History 31 Oct. 2017 What Was the Main Point of the Enlightenment Philosophers? The Enlightenment was known as a philosophical movement or the age of reason. It took place in the late 17th and 18th century.…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thus leading individuals to create social contracts again for peace and protection of property. Not giving up their free will or rights. Locke believes the law of nature of still bound here. That the state exists solely to do what nature couldn’t and that is to uphold and protect natural rights of men.…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The bases behind John Locke’s idea were natural laws and rights to life, liberty, and property. The philosophical thinker, John Locke, also believed that one's right to rule came solely from the “consent of the governed.” According to Locke, political power is when an individual's state of nature is given up for the overall good of society. John Locke placed emphasis on life and liberty. His belief is reflected in the development of the United States government because the United States government is founded on the ideas of life liberty and the pursuit of happiness.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dorinda Outram’s book The Enlightenment contains the chapter “Enlightenment and Government” which highlights that contrary to popular belief, not all philosophes had the same ideas when it came to the ideal government. Outram focuses on the misconceptions people had about the Enlightenment and bring to light the true differences people had about government during this time period. Outram discusses the relationship between the Enlightenment and government, a relationship that has had few research. Through the lives of three leaders in Enlightenment and government John Lock, Baron de Montesquieu, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau, it is clear how philosophes greatly differed yet had many similarities in the way they viewed government. John Locke’s view of government is based on the idea that all men are in a state of nature by God; Locke refers to this state as perfect freedom in Second Treatise on Government.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Maxwell James 9/29/16 Mr. Puzzo World History (H) John Locke and the French Revolution John Locke was a French philosopher and was interested in how a citizen and a government interact together, in times of peace and in times of tension. John Locke studied government and came to many conclusions; the role of government is to protect citizen’s natural rights: Life, Liberty and property. If a government wasn’t adequately protecting citizen’s natural rights, the citizens had a responsibility to overthrow that government and establish a new government that does better to protect those rights.…

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Locke thinks the nation of nature as a country of ideal freedom, in which men can order their moves, and dispose of their possessions as they think suit. the liberty of men in the kingdom of nature is handiest limited by way of the law of Nature, individuals can act as they please inside its premises. but the nation of nature is likewise a state of equality wherein all the strength and jurisdiction is reciprocal, nobody having more than some other. Equality derives from the herbal condition of men, which makes all of them equal while enjoying the benefits of nature, therefore there may be no subordination between individuals.…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This paper will demonstrate the apparent contrast or correlation between Locke 's beliefs and these three individuals. Johns Locke, an English political thinker, believed that Men have real freedom, expresses the power of their mind when they are happily directed. This free man in its conquest of happiness is the man of the state of nature. He has a life of its own and has the right and duty to preserve. The state of nature refers to the state before human existence became socially organized.…

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays