Compare And Contrast Han China And Alexander The Great

Superior Essays
There are many elements needed to create a stable empire. Two great empires that will help asses this subject are the Han Dynasty and Alexander the Great’s rule over the Greek empires. The Han Dynasty offered a somewhat peaceful and free community conducive to stability, while Alexander led an empire that crashed after his death due to poor decisions that did not benefit the populous and allow for much progression. They key to the Han Dynasty’s success was the way the leaders made an empire that fostered many great ideas and allowed the progression of science and technology and the ability to trade and unify with other countries. I also believe the key to the Han’s success was the way the government was set up to let many people rule over the land and keep it stable. The Han Dynasty was a great dynasty that still has great importance in China today! The Han Dynasty was formed in modern day China by …show more content…
and ruled as a Greek Emperor from 336-323 B.C.E. Alexander the Great is considered to be one of the most influential people in history! During his reign as emperor, Alexander led many successful and important conquests which expanded his empire and reinforced his power. Alexander was an over achiever and was never satisfied with his accomplishments. Alexander was also known as a violent and cruel ruler and this greatly affected the overall atmosphere of his rule. The empire he ran was a very strict absolute monarch. This meant that he was the one ruler who made all the decisions. This also meant that he could make any decision and wasn’t limited by a constitution or set of rules. Alexander clearly ran an empire centered on himself and didn’t give much thought to his citizens. After his death, his empire crumbled. This is due to the lack of a stable government. When he died, there was no leader who could fill such big shoes. In the process of finding a new leader, the empire became divided and this led to the end of the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Alexander The Great DBQ

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This shows Alexander cared about others since he would not kill innocent people. Exceptional leaders, as well as great people would not kill innocent people. Another reason Alexander was great is found in document D. Document D states they were on a long tough journey through the desert and needed water. They found a little bit of water, but there was not enough so he poured it out because his attitude was if there is not enough water for everyone then nobody could have it. This evidence matters for the reason that it shows he cared about his soldiers and wanted to be fair and not selfish.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages

    After Alexander's sudden death in 323BCE, Politically, the huge power which he created became unstable. Therefore, his military leaders…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The downfall of Rome could also be blamed on the problem of succesion. After the death of an emperor, generals fought with each other for sovereignty. The authority of Rome was drastically lessened and the law was practically diminished. Moreover, the Han had various reasons for their recession. The court had become weak, with disinterested emperors who remained entirely for pleasure.…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rome and Han China at their peaks were the largest and most successful empires the world had yet seen. While Rome centered around the Mediterranean Sea in Europe- from the Roman city-state in central Italy- Han China was based in most of present day China, with the Han homeland located east in the empire. Although in no close contact of each other- the Roman Empire and Han China being separated by thousands of miles- both of these great civilizations grew to great heights and shared many characteristics. While the declines of the Roman Empire and Han China were very similar, both experiencing a collapsing economy, inefficient government, and invasions by other peoples, the differences in their downfalls lie in the core ideals of the empires and how each issue was handled.…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rome and the Han dynasty were two very successful and influential empires. The language started by the Romans became the basis of many languages all over the world. During the Han dynasty many inventions were created that are still in use, such as the compass and paper. Rome and China’s similarities, expansionistic military and monopoly of trade, helped them prosper. Their difference, how their governments functioned, led to the decline of the Roman empire.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both empires were centralized based off their empires locations. Without the centralizing of governments neither empire would have been able to strive. The Imperial Romans needed a centralized government because of the benefits such as Pax Romana the Imperial Rome golden age. Without the government being a coherent whole they wouldn’t have functioned properly, and would have been in constant chaos because there weren’t many natural barriers keeping the Roman land separate from each other. The same for the Hans who needed to be together and connect to maintain the empire as it was such a large piece of land.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roman Empire Dbq

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages

    a second fundamental flaw in the Roman Empire that eventually led to its end is the politic instability within the government as example document one shows the graph of impose how long was shoved and how they were killed the graph revealed that the emperor was usually not the same past three years most impose was killed in battle and will quickly repaired this was a troubling time for the Roman protecting themselves from Intruders but also maintaining peace with their always knew Rita history.com stage Civil War does the empire into shoes and more than twenty men took the throne in the span of a new 75 years it is clear that unstable control over the Empire is is one of the reasons it is not still here…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Courage is the only thing that Alexander the Great definitely had. He stayed strong in the empire's weakest times. Living in the world that this empire took place in, was very tough. Many empires and city-states want power more than anything else. Alexander had the ability to conquer more land than any other empire in ancient times (Doc A and C).…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Alexander of Macedon: A Great Leader Being the first person to conquer the Egyptian, Greek, and Persian empires in just over a decade was no walk in the park, and neither was integrating a culture into all of those empires nor attempting to unite them all. Alexander of Macedon was this man: he conquered the greatest empires, spread the Greek influence, and lead in a unique way with his inspiring character that he is famous for. Although he was not the ideal leader such as Plato’s idea of a philosopher-king, he was an ethical man who wanted his people content. His well-known title, “Alexander the Great,” was very appropriate for him: his fine character and social goals, his unique political leadership and strategic conquering, and his economic…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Alexander the Great was not truly great because he was an inhumane leader and his empire quickly collapsed after he died. Alexander wasn’t truly great because he was inhumane to other people and seemed like a bad general, “Ferocious manhunt…30,000 in number, he sold into slavery. Two thousand men of military age were crucified”(Doc C). He obtained 2,000,000 square miles and founded 70 cities(Doc E). However, in nearly every city, Alexander would sell most of the people into slavery and kill the remaining of the people.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Alexander the Great was a villain who knew how to manipulate people into thinking he was the good guy. Alexander had his fair share of good guy moments but overall Alexander used the good side people saw to manipulate them into doing as he wanted. Due to Alexander’s violence and mistreat to the human race he is villain. When Alexander the Great conquered new land he usually treated the people and the land in a cruel and disrespectful manner.…

    • 102 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Decline Of Roman Empire

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The weakened dictatorship also lead to disagreement among the Senate and the emperor. Since the emperor has complete power, the Senate wasn’t able to overrule him. The created many problems because if the emperor didn’t know how to finance the Empire or know military strategies the Senate wasn’t able to help him. The Roman Empire would always encounter predicaments because every Empire wants to be at the top and to be at the top, they had to defeat the Empire at the top and that Empire…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Panhellenism Panhellenism, meaning "All Greece" is term for Greek nationalism a social ideology under Philip II of Macedonia, and later introduced and fully implemented later by his son Alexander the Great. Defined unity of the Greek world and what it meant to be Greek. 2. Hellenic League…

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During his path to capturing much of the world he had been egotistical and self-centered. When he worked to move from place to place, Alexander expected people to obey his commands. According to the article “Alexander the Great “ For their stubborn resistance, the inhabitants of the city were slaughtered and the survivors sold into slavery.” This shows that Alexander cared very little for the people he conquered. He worked very to ruin their civilizations and their lives in general.…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The life and history of Alexander the Great, and the empire that he formed, has been studied by people ever since his death. Alexander’s empire ruled over a large portion of land from Greece in the west to India, in the east. His actions brought an end to the long standing conflict that the Persians and Greeks had with each other, established multiple cities that bore his name across the land that he conquered, had a major influence on future rulers, and had remnants that lasted until the time of the Roman Empire. Alexander not only had a prominent place in history, but he also contributed to advancements in military tactics of the ancient world. The life of Alexander had a far reaching effect on world history that lasted for centuries after his death, and the study of his life can help a person understand various facets of history that were inspired or influenced by his actions.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics