Compare And Contrast Haisha And Inuits

The Indians of the Arctic are very different, but can also be similar in many different ways. Chiefly, a comparison and contrast will be done about the Iroquois, the Haidia, and the Inuit native populations. These Arctic tribes share several similarities and present many differences to examine as well. All three tribes were alike in habits. None of these tribes spoke English. They spoke their native tongues, each of which was different. The Iroquois, Haidea and Inuits all embodied myths and unique art. The Haidia’s myth was about the raven, and the Inuit’s myth was about the separation of red and white foxes. Furthermore, the Iroquois was about how the mosquito came into existence. Haidia and Iroquois both had longhouses, another commonality. This is because both tribes did not have to be nomadic. Last of all, all tribes came in contact with Europeans. This was largely due, in part, to the fact that Europeans were exploring the New World as this time. As you can glean …show more content…
Their non-English languages puts them in a similar category. Contact with European influences also made them indistinguishable. The other main similarities had to do with each tribe/culture having myths and fine art emanate from their existence. Differences, overall, had to do with food sources, being nomadic or not due to food sources moving, and with the ability to farm or not farm, in relationship to weather at more northern points in the Arctic. Whether or not the tribes fished also helped to show differences between their lifestyles. Also, food storage was different for these three tribes. Overall, the Inuits, Iroquois, and Haidia are all Canadian Natives who shared some commonalities and who had their differences. It is an interesting study to see how food sources moving and how the ability or inability to farm can impact the lifestyles of three different