Compare And Contrast Garvey And Web Du Bois

Improved Essays
William Edward Burghardt Du Bois was an extremely influential African-American leader during the late 19th century. In 1909, he created the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People based on the principles of “education for blacks and equality”. Du bois believed that being educated about the issues of the black race would cease the mistreatment of its people.
Both, Marcus Garvey and W.E.B Du Bois men advocated for Pan-Africanism, were activists for the rights of African-Americans, and believed that “the genuine issue in the world [was] white domination”, W.E.B Du Bois’s philosophy of Pan-Africanism differed from Marcus Garvey’s to a great extent. To elaborate, W.E.B Du Bois believed that Pan-Africanism “must become a part
…show more content…
Thus, Du Bois only accepted some of Garvey’s ideas on black pride. Later he argued that “Garvey’s Black Star Line idea was corrupt and that it was suspicious”, and this claim was confirmed in 1922 when “Garvey was arrested on mail fraud charges for selling stock in a ship that had not yet been purchased for the Black Star Line”. Garvey’s intentions were to create a successful, black-owned business, however he was harming the black population by harming his image since many blacks looked up to him. Du Bois also believed that “the privilege of being white restrains the dreams”, however, Garvey’s action of “forming an alliance with the Ku Klux Klan” said otherwise. Since Garvey created an alliance with white supremacists and allowed them to have a role in preventing Negroes from prospering properly, it made him look like he was siding with the white race and it only looked as if he was going against his own ideologies about how the white individuals of America slowed the prosperity of African-Americans. Du Bois believed that Garvey was a misleading enemy to the Negro race, and by becoming an ally to the very force that did not want to treat blacks equally, the Ku Klux Klan, Garvey’s actions …show more content…
Both of the men’s ideas were used to promote Black Nationalism and encourage the black community to be politically successful. The idea of pro-communism restricts the private responsibility of trades and private profit and the central government controls trades and gain, as pro-capitalism permits private trades and wealth without a central government regulating any of the buying and selling trends. In an “Address by W. E. B. Du Bois delivered at All African Peoples' Conference in Accra, Ghana on December 9, 1958”, Du Bois justified why he did not promote capitalism. He states that “private capitalism is doomed”, and that “Africa is whirled by the bitter struggle of dying private Capitalism into the least great battle-ground of its death throes, you are being tempted to adopt at least a passing private capitalism as a step to some partial socialism. This would be a great mistake.” Du Bois believed that promoting capitalism would damage Black Nationalism in its entirety since its intentions are for blacks to come in unity with one another, however, Garvey’s idea of pro-capitalism lost out because it abandoned the key concept of unifying African-Americans. In other words, Garvey’s ideology promoted separatism instead of

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    “the black man in American has to lift up his own sense of values, (X, 301).” In the early period, he thought the black people were oppressed by white people and society should help African American to achieve their equal position. However, he lately thought the right of the black people should depend on themselves without other’s help. They could develop their own industries and company in order to promote their social position. At the same time, he also reconsidered the problem of all white people are evils. “the white man is not inherently evil, but America’s racist influence him to act evilly, (X, 406),” he said.…

    • 2074 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He constantly challenged the legality of the laws and wanted blacks to work together to fight the laws. His weakness was his approach to improve African American life failed in the Plessy v. Ferguson case because Plessy challenged that he was 7/8 white and the state still ruled that he was African American. The state argued that his features were distinct too express that he was African American. Washington’s argument is more directed towards the attitude of resulting back to slavery with…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    He called Marcus Garvey the most dangerous enemy of the Negro race, especially because he met with the white American power Ku Klux Klan movement because he believed they were the face of the American government. He met with the Ku Klux Klan to discuss their similar ideas of separatism, and support each other ideas of white America for white people and Black Africa for black people. W.E.B Du Bois concentrated on integration of both white and black communities and depended on the leadership and aid of white people although he refused to accept white supremacy. Higher education was his strategic motive for blacks to be accepted as American citizens. Marcus Garvey movement fell apart among the problems and dispute that was occurring among the union itself.…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This was another aspect that made the book important second to the economic background of slavery. The development of racism came about as a means of isolating the African community from the ruling and dominant white. One advantage that aided in the selection of Africans as a source of slavery was solely based on their inability to blend in due to their skin color. Their status as slaves and their skin color then lead to the discrimination of the African people in the American and Caribbean plantations. As they were deemed ‘disposable,’ the development of an inferiority complex was then inevitable especially with the sweet-toothed Westerners who only viewed their labor as tools to maximize their profits rather than humans.…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lincoln did not really feel bad for the slaves. He showed little interest in the pain the blacks were going through, but he publicly expressed that slavery is morally evil. There is evidence to suggest that Lincoln was a racist, and he also has stated that he believes in a “White America.” Lincoln would often argue that the forefathers were against slavery, but they had to put up with because it already existed in American. Lincoln had the same mentality. He thought it was morally wrong and evil, but he had to put up with it because if the slaves were freed there would be a gigantic uproar, that would tear America apart.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In essence Garvey believed that America was not the right place for blacks at the time and in no way could he envision a successful outcome for backs in America. Hence, he wanted to lead the large migration of blacks back to Africa. Garvey condemned the anti-egalitarian views of whites denying blacks equal rights. Garvey wanted blacks to not only seek an industrial voice but also a political voice. He was a pan Africanist who held the views of anti-colonialism and the global unity of blacks and Africa as the home blacks.…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While some may claim that it was a defense of states’ rights, it was a hypocritical defense of states’ rights to crush a group’s individual rights, some of which, like the Second Amendment, had existed long before the Civil War. The code relied on deceptive language to disguise this violation of rights. Apprenticeship, for instance, painted white persons as saviors, helping needy African American children, while in reality it reasserted white supremacy. The code, because it was written by white Democrats with political power, fails to account for the opinions of African Americans, and of the Southern whites who supported emancipation. It ignores the struggles of African Americans to overcome socio-political hurdles by obtaining an education in schools and colleges run by African Americans, by establishing communities and community leaders in churches, and even by aligning with Populists and other Democrats to influence politics, even if these parties didn’t always align with black interests.…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Washington advocated for equality for African Americans by being more conservative, as opposed to aggressive during protests. He believed that violence would be ineffective for African Americans; it would only make matters worse for them. He expressed his thoughts on the issue during his 1895 speech called the “Atlanta Compromise.” In this speech, Washington stated that African Americans should accept social segregation and as long as whites allow them economic progress, educational opportunity and justice in the courts (Coffman, Anita and Rose, Vanessa). In response to Washington’s famous speech, author W.E.B Du Bois challenged Washington’s ideas in his book The Souls of Black Folk, saying “Mr. Washington’s programme practically accepts the alleged inferiority of the Negro races.” He believed that protests were necessary for a change in equality, instead of “blending in” with white people.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Johnson shocked most or the Northerns when he basically switched sides following Lincoln’s assassination. Johnson blocked most of the Norths legislation as he truly felt that African Americans were inferior to Whites. He supported Laissez-Faire, a document that stated states rights over-powered central authority. Thus implying slavery as a states rights and government couldn't abolish it. He believed slavery was essential to the economy and he shunned ending plantations or giving blacks equal rights.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Stephens said that the Negro was not equal to white men and it was only right that he be subordinate. He argued that the North was fighting a principle of politics that went against what God wanted. Incredibly, there were some rare people like Hinton Helper, a North Carolinian who were opposed to slavery. Helper is not concerned with the morality of slavery so much as he is with its social and economic effects. Helper stated, “to say nothing of the sin and the shame of slavery, we believe it is a most expensive and unprofitable institution…” He further claimed that if slavery was gone, non-slaveholding whites would reap the moral benefits because they would be seen as equals.…

    • 1293 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays