Dictatorship Vs Dictatorship Essay

Improved Essays
Governments are the sole things that will make a country run smooth. When we put a society ruled by a monarchy and a society run by a dictatorship, we can clearly see the similarities and differences that define these two governments. In an absolute monarchy, the country is ruled by a family that will make all of the laws for the people, but in a dictatorship, there is only one singular person that decides the laws for the country. For both of these countries, this means that the people will have no say in any laws, and are forced to follow something they have no control over. Using sources from the internet and putting them side by side, we can compare and contrast the two governments. To start, there are certain similarities that both monarchs and dictatorships have. Both of the leaders of each government are not elected into power, but are born into kingship, or they make themselves leader as dictator. In most governments, laws are made by the cabinet, and can be voted on by the population. In both an absolute monarchy and a dictatorship, laws are made by the leaders, and the population will have no say in the matter. These government types are usually found in countries that have had active military activity in the past five years. Both of these governments embody the exact opposite of …show more content…
They take total control over a country and force the people to follow orders, disobeying their human rights in some instances. Absolute monarchies may not always take power by force like dictatorships, but usually they do not change their ways, keeping the people away from the country’s affairs. These countries do not always have the best structure systems, because when you only have one person running the system, they cannot keep up to the standard of 20 or more people all focusing on different issues. Both government types are seen in our modern world today, and both countries are running well enough on their

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Monarchy means king or queen has the 100% power to dominate the nation. And after the king died, his son will inherit his throne. China used to be monarchy for more than thousand years. This system of domination will cause people’s revolt that is in the lowest status in the society. For example, Emperor Qin forced his citizen to built The Great Wall. He used violence and threat to convene men to work until they were exhausted. After many years, some revolt was begin from this people who suffering ; they overturned the system that Qin built and created…

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These rulers are an influential part in the development of history. This can be seen in the decree to innovate, explore new lands, and create reforms during their reign. The key idea to these rulers is that they had power. These rulers had control over their governments which allowed for them to be a dominant part in society. Rulers like Ramses II who commissioned great architectures in Ancient Egypt or Pericles who reformed citizenship in Ancient Athens. These people had the power to control, thus having the power to remember. As long as this power continues through the generations, so will the legacy of monarchy. What today’s monarchy lacks is this sense of power over their designated society. How will a person ever be an influence if that very person was not a part of it in the first place? Although the history of monarchy will continue in textbooks and in the effects on society, the overall effect of modern day monarchs will be lost. Constitutional monarchy allows for the Sovereign to have some sort of power, it is limited to certain cases. The idea of sovereignty thrusts traditional beliefs that cannot keep up with modern day values. This would evidently leads to its own…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Absolutism Dbq Analysis

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In a democratic country, citizens are encouraged to vote for their leaders and representatives, but in an absolute country, citizens are unable to vote for their leaders. Additionally, citizens have numerous rights and liberties such as the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness under democratic rule. Contrarily, citizens have little to no liberties and freedoms under absolute rule. Despite the differences between the two, democratic rule and absolute rule both provide national strength to their country. Democracies and absolutisms have many differences but can relate in a few…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    throughout history absolute monarch use it power to more easily control their territory. although absolutism strengthen a nation absolutism weaken a nation more than strengthen because absolute power corrupted absolutely and wars wage by the monarch puts a heavy burden on the peasant. such example can be seen during the reign of Louis XIV in France ( 1643 - 1715 ) and peter the Great in Russia ( 1682 - 1725 )…

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    If the dictator wants it it happens for the good or the bad. Now I feel this leads to a grate amount of stability in that if the dictator wants it it goes this way the people don't have to worry about the more shadier side of the politics. A dictatorship leads to low crime rate this is because historically the laws passed be the dictator are quite harsh such as work camps for life or just death I think this leads to a lower crime rate because the people are to scared of the harsh punishment to do anything that is agenst the dictator or the laws the pass. The last pro of a dictatorship is efficiency in dictatorship a lot gets done for the good or bad because one person controls the whole government there is nothing that stops them from passing whatever they want this leads to efficiency because no one can stop or argue with them to pass laws. One of the cons for a dictatorship is one person has all the power if the one person in power has malaise intent or does not know how to run a country they can make bad decisions or pass laws that can limit the freedom of the people they rule. In a dictatorship the person in charge of the country can develop become power hungry or developed a god…

    • 2109 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Louis Xiv Dbq Analysis

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Absolute monarchs and democracies are both types of government, however there are some major differences that set the two apart. In absolute monarchies the people have little to no power to influence governmental decisions. In Document 1: This illustration depicts the government of France from the mid-1600s to the early 1700s, the absolute ruler appears to be King Louis XIV. He is looking down upon his subjects, the nobles, as they kneel before him. When Louis ruled over France, he chose the sun as his emblem, signifying that everything revolved around him. This left no room and power for the people of France to argue. Louis XIV controlled every aspect of the citizens lives, leaving the citizens with no power over the government and their decisions…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When a ruler holds authority that is only second to the divine being themselves, an absolute monarch is born. Throughout history, Europe has been home to many individuals that helped define the term absolutism and absolute monarchy. Most notably are Louis XIV of France and Peter the Great of Russia during the late 1700s. When examining a ruler’s legacy underneath the premise of absolute monarchy, how nice or how effective of a ruler has no effect. On the contrary, an absolute monarch is defined by the outrageous and the absurd. An absolute monarch is defined by their actions and how capable they are of imposed their will on their subjects, despite how incorrect or detrimental others may deem it to be. And when…

    • 1658 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dictatorship has many benefits yet consequences too. Some of the benefits are that it helps in social stability, discipline and order and in economic development, however, the consequences are: Dictatorship’s priority is to maintain power,…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    There are many counties with many different forms of government. Although, what is widely considered to be the best form of government is democracy, it allows citizens to have a variety of rights and freedoms while putting constraints on the government’s power. Authoritarian regimes on the other hand are widely considered to be awful forms of government. Authoritarian regimes have centralized leadership without any real checks on power and suppression of civil liberties. This begs the question, if authoritarian regimes are so bad, why are they seen so much? This can be traced back to many different reasons, the Contagion effect, world crises, disputed territory, a quick route to power and authoritarian appeals.…

    • 1444 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout history nations have risen from the ground to become great empires, conquering and ruling over vast lands. Textbooks describe these nations along with their dictators, providing details about life under these countries and the lands obtained. Julius Caesar, Adolph Hitler, Joseph Stalin- these examples of dictators were strong military leaders that gained success for their nations, but their success was short lived. However, other nations were built on different ideologies and beliefs, creating governments unlike harsh authoritative leaders. The success of these nations was due to their collaborative governments. There were many different types of rulers, such as harsh dictators, or democracies; God-like totalitarians triumphed…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Absolute Monarch : government in which the monarch has absolute power among his or her people.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many different types of governments in history. When you compare a Constitutional Monarchy and a Democratic Presidency, it can be clear that the two are very different but alike. For the Democratic Party, the people hold its’ supreme power. For example, the United States falls under the Democratic Presidency. The U.S. is broken up into different levels, and three branches concluded of the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. For a Constitutional Monarchy, it is the oldest type of government in the U.K. For example; the British Monarchy is a particular type under the Constitutional Monarchy. In a constitutional monarchy, the government is constitutionalized to share power with the monarch. Analyzing a Constitutional Monarchy and Democratic Presidency reveals many enthralling similarities as well…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    A dictatorship is a form of government, where a country is run by a single person or a small group of political figures who makes decisions for the country and ensures that his or her power remains strong and under control. In other words, the dictator or person in charge controls every aspect of the private and public control of citizens. Some examples of a dictatorship include, Adolf Hitler in Nazi Germany, Mussolini in Italy, and Joseph Stalin in Soviet Russia. The United States could be described as a dictatorship or exemplify a few similarities in several ways, some ways being more extreme and others more subtle. For example, some people argue that the President of the United States might have too much power. As Commander in Chief, The…

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Totalitarianism and the authoritarianism share similarities such as: who has the control and the domain of the political power under a country, the connection that these dictators have with their population, and how they. How they exercise absolute control. These regimes have always been wrong to any society, because the population are mostly affected, they lose their democracy, dignity, the freedom, and even their…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At one extreme there is the autocratic leadership, who can take the position of a dictatorship. This type of leader has the only and final say. Typically, an autocratic leader does not involve their subordinates in any situation which requires a decision to be made. An autocratic leader may resort to force, manipulation, or even threats to achieve their desired results.…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays